|
I am a woman I agree. Woman should be allowed to participate in front line combat. Not allowing
very capable women do this wastes their abilities and makes them feel devalued |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
From an American point of view in regards to American women:
I accept this post only if those women who would fight on the front lines do so in defense of the
Constitution and of our...OUR..let me say it again...O U R...borders. If their blood is to be shed
anywhere, I would prefer it be on American soil fighting for their homeland! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
If your willing to kill, I don't see why not. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I wasn't aware they weren't allowed to |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Gender should be irrelevant. It's about physical capability, if a person passes the minimum
physical requirements to fight front line then they should be on that list regardless of gender. It
may turn out 90% men on the front line anyway, who knows, but I am certain there are some women far
more physically capable than some men. And frankly it's archaic to say because they are women they
should not be allowed to fight. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No argue there, they can fight on the front line, they can group up into a large mass and charge the
enemy with swords and flags, Why does it matter where they fight? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
If a woman passes all the physical tests that serving in the army requires, then yes, they should be
able to fight wherever men can. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
They should, but I'd rather not have that. Why send women to almost certain death? I should have
voted FOR... |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
01 Oct 2008 18:49
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
