|
I agree with the intellectual basis of this debate, on the grounds that it makes sense from a
spiritual, and relational basis of justice from the Universe.
My argument? That ALL religions on earth agree with only one concept: What goes around comes around,
karma, law of sowing and reaping, do unto others as you would have others do unto you, what goes up
must come down, boomerang-effect.
All religions are in observational-agreement on this topic!
I say, that given the overwhelming agreement world-wide, that this principle is very highly-likely
truthful and accurate. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
It would be nice if it did but half the time if people do get their comeupance its merely down to
chance or coincidence. There is no force out there that makes bad or evil people get what they
deserve. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
What goes around comes around is simply a quote based on coincidences. Lets say someone considered
bad, does something to somebody considered good. Assuming the situation, the bad guy who did
something bad to the good guy wouldn't always be the bad guy. And the good guy, who had
complications according to the bad guy, could be just getting what he deserved according to the
saying what goes around comes around. In that sense, that theory is based on the fact that people,
no matter who they are, will always do good and bad things, intentionally or not, and will always
receive bad or good fortune and treatment. So its not a matter of what you do, it's a matter of when
you receive good or bad fortune or treatment, subject to the situation. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I don't agree. Some people end up getting their comeupance but many others don't. Not everything
that goes around, comes around and when it does it has no bearing on what that person has done in
the past. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
There is no balance or equilibrium to the deeds people do. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
20 Aug 2008 17:14
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
