» Home » Society
We Should Get Rid Of The "under God" Statement In The Pledge Of Allegiance
I say we should
 timmercj  07 Apr 2008 16:56
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
Yes, it is not only offensive to atheists to be forced to say it, but to any other religion because when the term is used is means the Christian gods, muslims should be allowed to say allah.
Hindus have many gods,
and atheists do not believe at all, why can we not be under the government instead of a deity
 
 martlamb  29 May 2008 13:02
 Add a Comment
 
 
Being a Christian myself I have to say I don't understand why the super Christians have to live in a world where everyone follows their belief. Let those that don't believe live their life and stop forcing them to believe your ideas. You say if they don't like it they don't have to say it but what about those people that believe in the USA but not GOD going to do?
 
 thedan  26 May 2008 01:13
 1 Comment
 
 What, do you think in the USA we force people to say the pledge, and beat them if they don't or something. If you don't say the pledge, absolutely nothing happens, they just start class and go on. All your hearing is garbage from whiners, who don't say the pledge anyway, but just want to whine out loud and see if they can take away someone else"s rights.
by  stever
 26 May 2008 01:23
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
It wasn't originally in the Constitution

Separation of Church and State.

Not everyone's a Christian.

It encourages the belief among Christians in middle and high school that everyone follows an Abrahamic religion at the least, or are Christian, which leads to discrimination and division (I've been told at the least ten times by a teenager that I'm going to burn a hell because I don't believe in their God) If it wasn't so ingrained in American society and especially schools that the Christian way is the right and only way, then we wouldn't have so much religious discrimination and misunderstanding imo.
 
 FoxFire  20 May 2008 00:33
 2 Comments
 
 Separation of church and state isn't the constitution.
by  Mark
 20 May 2008 01:15
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I feel very strongly about this issue, as an atheist.
In California, an atheist filed a suit about the Pledge’s “under God,” and after years of legal wrangling up to the highest court level, it is still unresolved. I believe the argument was that since children in California are only required to stand for, but not actually recite, the Pledge, the atheist’s daughter was protected.
Let us remember that the offending words in the Pledge did not come into usage until the 1950s. It was not drafted by the Founding Fathers, so does not reflect this nation’s establishing principles.
The Pledge should be entirely secular. How “God” ever sneaked by the Supreme Court of the time baffles me.
And while we’re at it, let’s get rid of the opening prayers for Congressional sessions. Even though the current fad is to have non-Christians deliver them, it is still a violation of church and state.
 
 chispa  27 Apr 2008 23:27
 Add a Comment
 
 
Agreed i mean i sometimes i believe in god and sometimes i don't but surely not everyone does so lets just spread the peace by taking that off
 
 jmacluva  08 Apr 2008 01:52
 Add a Comment
 
 
The whole concept of a Pledge of Allegiance is abhorrent. If it's going to exist at all, it should be something that unifies rather than divides. Since many people don't accept the existence of invisible, magical beings, placing explicit references to them in the terms of the pledge would be unwise. Since the US constitution also prohibits any "establishment of religion", it would seem to constitute an instance of the government unfairly endorsing a magical belief system and therefore be illegal.
 
 Hidell  07 Apr 2008 23:20
 Add a Comment
 
 
I suppose I agree with this side of the debate. A god is not essential to everyone’s life. Therefore, speaking of one within the United State’s Pledge of Allegiance could be considered offensive to some people. However, no one can be forced to say the pledge. But then again, I suppose those who would like to, yet don’t want to feel as if they are idolizing a god should be able to do so.
 
 Hizashi  07 Apr 2008 19:41
 Add a Comment
 
 
Since not everyone believes in god, it should be removed. It could be deemed offensive to some people.
 
 cdubs  07 Apr 2008 18:05
 Add a Comment
 
 
Absolutely. It was only added to the pledge in the 1950s during the McCarthy era in the ridiculous belief that the "evil godless commies" couldn't say the pledge because of it. We are a secular society living in a country with freedom of religion and a government forbidden to support one religion over any other and our pledge of allegiance violates everything that our Constitution demands.

Time to get rid of it and return the pledge to what it originally was.
 
 Cephus  07 Apr 2008 17:55
 Add a Comment
 
NO! God is god is god. No matter what religion there is still a god, no matter what it translated to.

For those who are offended, just substitute your own gods name instead of saying god or not say that part at all. Simple as pre-made pie
 
 dolphins  29 Oct 2008 14:37
 Add a Comment
 
 
Never.

God, was and is the only portion of the American ideal worth upholding, and to Whom we owe our everything, including, our allegiance.

God, is America's King.
 
 Scorpion  26 Jul 2008 19:34
 Add a Comment
 
 
What does it do to affect you ? Nothing so what is the point of going through a big hassle just to get rid off two words. They is no point.
 
 higack  26 May 2008 00:53
 Add a Comment
 
 
No because I think the time would be better spent focusing on an issue that matters. People who fight words are just wasting their efforts.
 
 momof3  23 May 2008 21:06
 Add a Comment
 
 
I dont think it should be removed just because someone thinks its offending them in any way no ones forced to say the pledge of allegiance so if you dont like it then dont use it or say it because you DONT HAVE TO .
 
 mzysn  11 May 2008 22:50
 Add a Comment
 
 
I think we should appreciate what it must mean for a country that believes in freedom of religion to still invoke "under god" in its creed. Not under Christianity, not under Jesus, not under Washington, not under Freedom, not under George III, not under its own citizens even but rather under GOD. But in retrospect it is probably near impossible to comprehend what that means to someone coming to America for the first time hoping to be accepted, hoping such a conundrum exists. Yet it does.
 
 characters  19 Apr 2008 02:23
 Add a Comment
 
 
No we should not are you people crazy!!!!!??? We should keep it because we are under god aren't we!!!! It is not a law for people to say it but when it gets out of hand and people are burning flags that is just wrong. That is a disgrace to are US and the troops. If people don't care then why should they be fighting for are freedom??? Troops are out there for us and by god WE SHOULDN'T BE BURNING ARE FLAGS AND CHANGING ARE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE!!! There is nothing wrong with it. It is perfect. If you are against it then are you saying that are founding fathers and presidents are wrong.
 
 K-state208  15 Apr 2008 23:54
 Add a Comment
 
 
Why get rid of "under god"? Is don't hurt nobody......I am not religious but i say don't remove it....why change the pledge of allegiance for a few picky people who think that they matter more than the rest of us?
 
 freak8969  09 Apr 2008 18:43
 Add a Comment
 
 
If you get rid of the words "under GOD" you might as well git rid of the US, X that. You might as well get rid of the world. GOD created everything and if you don't have GOD, you don't exist!!
If it weren't for GOD, we wouldn't have this country, so I say no way should we take out the words, "UNDER GOD".
 
 im_trumpet  08 Apr 2008 20:04
 1 Comment
 
 You obviously are proud to know nothing of your own country's history.

Try looking up Bellamy's pledge as he wrote it in 1892. Here's a clue for the clueless: it doesn't contain the phrase, "under god". And Bellamy was a fundamentalist christian.
by  K9
 04 May 2008 11:59
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
If you DONT want to say the pledge.. Then DONT.
But don't take MY God.. OUR God out of it!

This country was BASED on God and Freedom. If you don't want to acknowledge that this country is
"one nation, under God" then don't do it!
 
 lkm709  08 Apr 2008 01:09
 Add a Comment
 
 
Why, may I ask should you take out the under God?
Is it affecting your life. Is it killing you that much just to say "under God"?
Yeah, I may be a Christian, but so what who cares. Why do you want to take it out. Give me one good reason. Again, is it affecting your life?
It sure isn't affecting any of my non-Christian friends why should it affect you? Or is it killing you that much to say God, with out using it in vain???
 
 Potterpal7  08 Apr 2008 00:37
 6 Comments
 
 I’m really not too interested in this particular debate as of right now, but your post has caught my attention for the moment. Let me counter what you’ve stated and see just how unsatisfied you might be if the tables were turned against your favor. If the portion of the pledge of allegiance that is being discussed was replaced with the phrase “under Allah” or “under Satan”, would you still be supporting the side you’re supporting at the current time? I’m just curious.
by  Hizashi
 08 Apr 2008 01:51
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
How about we have several variations and say "under [Insert your belief here]" So if you're Muslim you can say Allah or whomever, and if your christian say God or if you're Buddhist say whatever you would like.
 
 jjgoodson  07 Apr 2008 18:04
 3 Comments
 
 Does that not seem Anti-Patriotic if you are not willing to say the own Pledge of the country in which you reside?
by  jjgoodson
 07 Apr 2008 20:37
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity