» Home » Science
We Exist In The Fourth Dimension.
For an object to exist, it has to have a height, width and a depth. But as well as these it has to exist on a timescale otherwise it would just be instantaneous and in fact not exist. This is where the fourth (or sometimes even considered zeroth, as the others are spatial) dimension comes in. Any thoughts?
 chaew  09 May 2008 08:11
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
Yes, I totally agree with you, if we were in the 3rd, we wouldn't exist as there'd be no time for us to exist in.
 
 Hermione82  26 Sep 2008 20:38
 2 Comments
 
 Time does not exist.
by  wallaceg12
 03 Nov 2008 19:49
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Time is the 4th dim, therefore we live in it since we have time
 
 stricken36  09 May 2008 19:02
 Add a Comment
 
 
Time and space are wrapped around each other into one dimension, therefore any object that takes up space also takes up time.
 
 eisenhower  09 May 2008 18:55
 Add a Comment
 
 
I'm not sure if there's anyone who attempts to argue that we don't exist within a dimension of time.
 
 Hizashi  09 May 2008 08:20
 4 Comments
 
 Oh how wrong you are Hizashi. Koranzite is just logging on to a computer near me and he definitely has something to say about this.
by  chaew
 09 May 2008 08:23
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
We do not live in the fourth dimension. My hypothesis on the fourth dimension is that it is the state of mind. When you sleep you are in the fourth dimension, when you are on an acid trip you are in the fourth dimension, when you are in a coma you are in the fourth dimension. What is dimension? It is perception, if you perceive time to be nonexistent, that is through sleep or prolonged coma, then time is nonexistent. Time is but a measurement to pinpoint what has happened and what will happen. If you are in a coma then time around you is nonexistent until you return to the third dimension. You cannot re-measure time. Once it has happened then there is no way to go back to it, except through illusions of the past such as memories and film. You cannot change what has happened or what will happen, but you can change mass and distance therefore time cannot coexist with the other forms of measurements time is a special type of measurement, an illusionary measurement.

So I'm voting no
 
 wallaceg12  19 May 2008 23:55
 3 Comments
 
 it is the Third Eye of the Pineal Gland.
by  Scorpion
 03 Sep 2008 08:31
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
We are just the shadow of the 4th dimension so we must be in the 3rd
 
 markrjg  09 May 2008 21:16
 1 Comment
 
 And that statement is a shadow of my earlier argument...
by  Koranzite
 11 May 2008 17:56
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Time scales don't exist in the universe:P. We could classify it as a fourth dimension but the reason we have dimensions is for how objects are shaped not where they are. As Koran said time itself but classifying things as time scales is assuming that we control it.
 
 Smito  09 May 2008 13:43
 4 Comments
 
 We are part of a 4D object, as 2D objects are part of us, 3D objects.
by  Hermione82
 26 Sep 2008 20:40
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
The lengths of a cube do not appear shorter in 2d if you display the object in orthographic projection. And as for the tesseract statement you made - that we would see all sides as equal - that implies that the 4th dimension is spatial whereas I am saying that it is not, it is temporal.

This is supposed to be a comment for Ryan's response.
 
 chaew  09 May 2008 08:33
 5 Comments
 
 The 4th dimension is spacial, it is the shadow of that dimension above that generates time - the 4th dimension is not temporal in itself, it causes time.
by  Koranzite
 11 May 2008 17:55
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
We only exist in the third dimension but experience the indirect shadow of the dimension above. That shadow is known to us as time. If we existed in the fourth dimension, then we would be able to directly move and manipulate time around us. Imagine that you draw a cube. When it is represented in the second dimension, the dimension of depth appears shorter in the drawing. If a model of a cube is seen in the third dimension however, all the sides are equal in length. The shadow of a forth dimensional object is known as a teseract - a cube suspended inside another cube. If we truly existed in the fourth dimension, then we would see all of the sides as being equal.
 
 Koranzite  09 May 2008 08:29
 Add a Comment
 
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Einstein's Theory Of Relativity Is Still Relative Today
Evolution Should Be Debated According To The Science Of Evolution.
Turning The LHC On Is Not The End Of The World!
In Science, The Term “theory” Does Not Translate To “opinion” Or “speculation”.
There Is No Greater Flawed System Of Government Than Democracy.
Science Fair Projects Are Stupid.
There Really Have To Be A First Time For Everything
Religion And Science Cannot Co-exist.
Not All Scientific Theories Have Evidence Or Proof Of Its Validity.
Only The Willfully Ignorant Deny The Big Bang And Evolution.
New Debates
CHESS: It Is Not The Game You Are Playing:
All's Fair In Love And War Is True:
Women Prefer Cyrano De Bergerac To Mr.Perfect:
Everyone, Has A "Type" They Are Attracted To Most:
Stalin Did It For The Lulz
Receive My Exports, Girls, U Know You Want To
They Walk Among Us
It's Over 9000!!!!111 It Is!!!11111@
Do Donkeys Hve Skin???
Glasses Are For Batty Boys