|
|
 |
|
No.
But we are experiencing a backlash against Imbecileocity. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I have to laugh on this one.
"Real" is a debate waiting to happen.
Science is a really big word. A lot of great and horrible science.
Alternative medicine....that term covers a wide range of topics.
Spiritualist media? Have to define what all that covers.
Intelligent design. That one's always funny. We're talking really intelligent. Obviously more
intelligent that what is considered when debating the design issue.
We are, and have been experiencing a backlash against "intelligent" conversation for quite awhile.
I'm sure it has an effect on science. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I think your whole idea of science is messed up or just TOO small. Just because some fields of study
deal with things you can't touch, doesn't make them unreal or not science. If your definition of
science is that the results have to be reproducible EVERY time, the No form of medicine is science.
None work all the time, especially modern pharmaceutical medicine. Nothing last 7000 years that has
no basis in truth (Acupuncture) If that isn't a science I don't know what is. Why can't
spiritualism be a science, we're just in the beginning stages? |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|