|
That's Pinko to you comrade. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I was going to argue with you and started a detailed reply... And then thought... Eh, what's the
point? We really did just take a giant leap toward public ownership of major sectors of our
economy. And yes it really did take the aid of a political movement to get us there - not unlike
Lenin's plan. And yes there is indeed some reallocation of wealth on the horizon so those with less
will have more and those with more will have less....... Pass the vodka, comrade. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yeah, have to agree. It shows how soon folks forget that the promises of communism don't pan out. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Seems like some kinda hybrid but I'll give you a yes vote. The point is taken. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Nah. Wouldn't, couldn't happen Comrade. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Speak for yourself.
They haven't won yet.;-/) Handle |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I don't see it. Berlin Wall collapse, Soviet Union dissolution? There's barely a communist
government left in the world, certainly not a powerful one (I'm arguing that China is a market
economy more than a collective one). |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
02 Feb 2009 17:57
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
