|
|
 |
|
Not in the least. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
This is one of the most irrelevant comparisons around at the moment. Twilight is about so-called
vampires and the odd other rubbish interpretation of occult figures. Harry Potter centres around
witchcraft and wizardry and involves a wide range of other mythical creatures. Twilight is a 4-book
pile of bad grammar and amateur-quality writing, Harry Potter is a 7-book series of very good
writing and good plot-lines.
There just isn't any comparison.
P.s. Vampires do not sparkle... That's just plain ridiculous. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Harry Potter is more. Cephus is right. Twilight was a repulsive vampire rape fantasy. The two do
not even compare. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Twilight is utter garbage, it's vampire rape fantasy. Even my teenage daughter thinks it's complete
trash, the whole sparkly vampire thing is about the stupidest idea anyone's ever come up with.
People ought to be embarrassed reading this junk. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Oh not this debate again, anyway as much as I love hot, sexy, pretty boy vampires I do prefer the
Harry Potter films, better story if you ask me and the franchise seems more profitable. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
16 Sep 2009 08:43
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
