» Home » The Unknown
The Whole Creation Process Took Only 7 Days
This Is For Mark... I am using this to respond to your comment that when God created earth there was a long period of time between that of its creation and the creation of animals. However, that is only one theory. Another theory is that the whole process took only 7 days. What do the rest of you think?
 MichaelT  13 May 2008 01:45
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
The creation took 7 literal days, not millions of years.
 
 webman1200  12 Oct 2008 11:26
 Add a Comment
 
 
I believe in a literal 6 day creation.
 
 created  03 Oct 2008 18:55
 Add a Comment
 
 
That is true.
Read the book of Mormon Againsters.
 
 hb_26  29 Jul 2008 20:52
 Add a Comment
 
 
A good book to read if you are really interested is the student edition of The Case for a Creator written by Lee Strobel. Give it a try. It's non-ficiton about a journalist who investigates scientific evidence that points toward God. : )
 
 johnsmith  05 Jun 2008 20:53
 4 Comments
 
 Do you realize you are on the side for silly people who believe the earth was created 6 days, 6000 years ago?
by  Mark
 05 Jun 2008 20:56
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
According to popular belief and scientific consensus the earth is around 4.3 billion years old and the universe around 13.5 billion if not more. The earth will have taken millions of years to form not seven days as stated in the bible.
 
 kddan  12 Oct 2008 20:23
 Add a Comment
 
 
If for the sake of argument the universe is created then it is actually still being created and we are at 13.5-14 billion years and counting.
 
 finsch  03 Oct 2008 19:03
 Add a Comment
 
 
Creationism is a wrong idea and makes no sense. By the way, I like the way K9 spelt bible phonetically
 
 Tromanator  08 Sep 2008 09:03
 Add a Comment
 
 
It didn't take seven days. The buybull and its fables took about a thousand years and lots of revisionism and fabrication to end up with the book as it exists today.

The Earth, on the other hand came into existence about 9 billion years after the beginning of the universe, and it was another three and a half billion before the first signs of life arose (see: Michaelson-Urey experiments).

It's obvious that there's something severely wrong with religion when even proponents of the same belief system can't even agree. Meanwhile, the products of scientific minds from dozens of different fields all agree with each other and fit together neatly despite the disparity of their sources and evidence.
 
 K9  05 Jun 2008 20:48
 1 Comment
 
 Duh. Anyone with a brain knows the age of the earth.
by  Mark
 05 Jun 2008 20:49
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Well, if you want your theory to be compatible with scientific knowledge about such incidents, then no, the idea you proposed fails miserably. A six day creation time for everything within the Universe and on Earth is entirely different from what the evidence points to. However, if you don’t mind your theory showing complete ignorance towards common scientifically evidential knowledge, then I suppose you’re good to go.
 
 Hizashi  13 May 2008 03:12
 1 Comment
 
 Well put.
by  Mark
 13 May 2008 03:14
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
First off, the Earth is 4 billion years old, not 6000. The 7 days in Genesis are not literal 7 days. It's not a theory, the fact is there was billions of years between the creation of Earth and animals popping up. Stop reading the Bible in a hyperliterate fundy style.
 
 Mark  13 May 2008 02:56
 1 Comment
 
 yeah, I know but, the tricky part is, and maybe you can shed some light on this part for me since you have a more extensive bible log than I, God rested than awoke looking for man like he just she just took a brief nap, how much time elapse then, couldn't have been long because Adam was human.
by  Bacchus
 13 May 2008 03:05
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
What don't you understand, human time wasn't invented until the first woman started making babies. The good book says the stars and other lights in the sky was for signs and seasons not days and hours.
 
 Bacchus  13 May 2008 02:36
 Add a Comment
 
 
That you respect the format of this site by posting your ideas in the form of debate topics which are assertions.
 
 Hidell  13 May 2008 01:51
 Add a Comment
 
 
It's not a theory, it's a failed hypothesis. The religious proposed it, science examined it and found it completely without merit and in complete opposition to the observed facts and rejected it.

Just like every other rational, intelligent person has.
 
 Cephus  13 May 2008 01:51
 2 Comments
 
 I can only assume that you've read the Bible in an overly literal fashion.
by  Mark
 13 May 2008 03:25
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Satanist Should Be Put To Death
Danadams Is A Sick Perv And Should Be Kicked Off This Site.
Unicorns Exist
It's Pathetic That So Many People Can't Tell The Difference Between Money-grubbing Televangelists And...
God Is The One And God
There Is An Objective Moral Truth.
There Should Be Cameras Installed In School Buses Used To Transport Small Children And Babies.
Every Thing Was Made By God In 6 Days
Catholics Don't Worship Idols!!!!
Suicidal Attempts Are NOT Felonies
New Debates
CHESS: It Is Not The Game You Are Playing:
All's Fair In Love And War Is True:
Women Prefer Cyrano De Bergerac To Mr.Perfect:
Everyone, Has A "Type" They Are Attracted To Most:
Stalin Did It For The Lulz
Receive My Exports, Girls, U Know You Want To
They Walk Among Us
It's Over 9000!!!!111 It Is!!!11111@
Do Donkeys Hve Skin???
Glasses Are For Batty Boys