» Home » Miscellaneous
There Should Be A Law Against People Lying About Their Age And Having Sex.
I have a friend who has a 19 year old son, who got caught in the back seat of his car with a girl who told him she was 18. The police officer checked her I.D. And she was 16. My friends son got arrested, and will now have the label of sex offender for the rest of his life. I'm not condoning the kids actions but this girl wrecked his life with her lie. She should be punished for lying as well.
 codeman  15 Jun 2008 06:32
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
It's only 3 years. I thought there was a 4 year law....... I remember awhile ago someone i knew was 12 and lied to 19 year old and said she was 18, i'm not sure what they did but it was at least 2nd base(omgz). So it wasn't his fault, she really looked 18.
 
 iLoveJesus  31 Aug 2008 06:13
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree, and you have made a very clearly stated reason why.
Good job.
 
 Scorpion  25 Aug 2008 03:02
 Add a Comment
 
 
I completely agree, too many young men are falling foul of rape laws when they have been lied to.
 
 Snipex  24 Jun 2008 14:57
 Add a Comment
 
 
In America we have the wherewithal to bring a minor to trial as an adult, if the court deems through a separate hearing that the minor understands his or her actions. It seems to me, that in situations like you mention it should be allowed and feasible to have a hearing to determine whether she was capable of giving consent, since the idea of statutory rape is premised on the idea of being too young to give consent. Also many states have laws which deal with people who are close in age but one is just over and one is just under the age of consent, and typically in that scenario the sentences are greatly reduced.
 
 finsch  15 Jun 2008 16:25
 Add a Comment
 
 
It's one thing I've never understood about the "no sex till 18 law" - surely when a person legally can have sex is once they have sexually matured.
The girl was 16 - she was sexually mature, so he really shouldn't be branded a sex offender. In the UK his actions would have been perfectly legal.

Actually I'm pretty sure she could be had for "conspiracy to commit a crime"

If the situation were reversed i can guarantee there would have been a very different outcome.
 
 Damian  15 Jun 2008 11:17
 1 Comment
 
 The problem with having a age of consent based on sexual maturity is it is impossible to administrate. People mature (physically and mentally) at different times and speeds, the only way to discern when someone was mature enough would be a very personal and intrusive interview with a specialist. Even if this could be arranged, how do you know when to have the interview to 'catch' the moment of sexual maturity? Have it weekly or every day?

Whilst you are right, and sexual maturity is of course the only pure correct measure for pragmatic reasons an arbitrary line must be drawn, and the only argument is where the line should go. However it must go later than people may like because it must ensure all, or near to all people are ready for the responsibility it gives when they reach the age.

BTW, I live in the UK and fully respect and back an age of consent of 16, but I also vehemently argue a line must be drawn, and it must by it's nature be partially arbitrary.
by  Quincel
 15 Jun 2008 16:09
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
This is completely unfair to your friend's son. If the person who is an adult actually asks the individual with whom they intend to have sexual intercourse to confirm their age, then the onus is on the latter to tell the truth. By being proactive about this and inquiring about the girl's age, your friend's son acted in a relatively reasonable manner, considering the circumstances. What would have been unreasonable to expect him to ask the girl to produce photo ID.

I don't think that the girl should be punished for lying about her age, but neither should the boy, for believing what she said. I also cannot help but wonder how authorities would have reacted if the genders had been switched, and if a 19 year old girl had "seduced" a 16 year old boy. I think that part of the problem is that 16 year old girls are somehow still seen as innocent, while boys who are only slightly older are perceived as nasty, irresponsible, sex-driven creatures. As such, they are automatically seen as the culprit when an encounter such as the one described in this debate goes wrong.
 
 mackenzie  15 Jun 2008 08:59
 Add a Comment
 
 
She said she was 18 its her fault not the sons. She should be punished because she lied about her legal status. If she had gone to vote and said she was 18 and brought a fake ID she would get caught and be put in jail its not the voting systems fault if she lied.
 
 Smito  15 Jun 2008 07:05
 Add a Comment
 
I think we should all have fun
 
 detour2  15 Jun 2008 10:32
 Add a Comment
 
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Past Cases Should Be Relevant In A Court Of Law.
Thong Underwear Is Not Appropriate For Work
It Is Impossible To Eradicate The Human Race
Just Because A Person Is Atheist Doesn't Mean They Have No Morals.
It'd Be Nice To Have A Discussion-forum-place-thing For Non-debating Talks Among Many As Opposed To One...
Drama Is To Be Left To Ya Mama
The Crime Rate Will Be Increase In The Next 50 Years
Skinny People Are Better Than Anyone, Skinny Is The Way These Days.
Atheists Jump To Similar Conclusions About The Existence Of A Deity/Deities That Those Who Follow The...
Porn Is Not Necessary
New Debates
Nuclear Energy Is No Longer Harmful
We Should Just Say 'Merry Non-Religious Winter Solstice Event'.
CHESS: It Is Not The Game You Are Playing:
All's Fair In Love And War Is True:
Women Prefer Cyrano De Bergerac To Mr.Perfect:
Everyone, Has A "Type" They Are Attracted To Most:
Stalin Did It For The Lulz
Receive My Exports, Girls, U Know You Want To
They Walk Among Us
It's Over 9000!!!!111 It Is!!!11111@