» Home » Miscellaneous
There Is No True Logic. Everything Is Relevant Nothing Is Fact.
100 years ago people thought they would never run out of oil. They thought that oil would be a good resource that would last. That was the extent of their knowledge and logic. Today we know that oil is not infinite and that we we need to make a new type fuel to support ourselves. Our new knowledge creates new logic.
 Smito  12 Jul 2008 17:21
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
The fact is that oil has never run out. What has run out is diplomacy. Politicians no longer respect each other.
 
 keepmindok  12 Jul 2008 20:52
 Add a Comment
 
ALLTRUTH IS OBJECTIVE, ABSOLUTE AND UNIVERSAL

That doesn’t mean anyone knows everything. And it doesn’t mean people can’t think they know something, but are mistaken. If a statement is true it is true for everyone, everywhere, all the time. Now, there are people who question this absolute nature of truth. They believe that truth is relative. Some statements are true for some people, while not for others.

But that is simply false thinking. If a proposition is true, it is true for everyone, everywhere, all the time. If a proposition is untrue the same must be said. An untrue proposition is untrue for everyone, everywhere, all the time.
 
 v00v  05 Nov 2008 01:29
 Add a Comment
 
 
Logic is simply a process what you are talking about is priorities and common perception. The process of logic remains the same but how you apply it changes with priority changes and changes in available information. Logic is pure but it will not ever lead two people to the exact some place because every person has different priorities and a different perception of the facts.
 
 finsch  12 Jul 2008 18:09
 5 Comments
 
 So what you are saying is if all the facts are known then we can come to a logical conclusion?
by  joe9
 12 Jul 2008 18:14
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
THAT SOUNDS ABOUT RIGHT! Was this derived from the midwife of our thoughts? A wee bit of Socratic irony, whato?
 
 joe9  12 Jul 2008 18:07
 Add a Comment
 
 
"First the discussion on oil isn't really about "logic". People may have been naive back then but it's not like they applied a rule of logic (like a=b, b=c, so a=c) to jump to the conclusion oil would last forever" You seem to say that humans have to think about logic to use it. If I'm walking across a hill and i see a boulder in my way i use logic by walking around it do i not?
"Second, "logic" is a tool. It has some definite valid applications but it isn't the answer to everything. Taken as an absolute it can be damaging. I had an odd professor in college who claimed to have used logic to prove rape is sex and he repeatedly sent manuscripts to journals to publish it and was repeatedly rejected. Then he'd come to class and complain the entire academic world didn't fully understand his irrefutable logic."
His logic was relevant to his definition of sex. His definition I'm guessing was more two people sharing a experience, id explain further but it would probably all be removed, another's definition may have been two people, both willing, sharing a experience. In his definition he was logical in another persons it was illogical its relevant to the persons definition.

"Third, regarding relativity, yes I think most things in life are relative. If you compare a situation with something better or worse you can learn a lot. However, there are still some things that are absolute. If you get decapitated you die. You could compare your body with a fully decomposed skeleton and say relatively speaking you are more alive than the skeleton, but that's not really true is it? Some things are absolute fact"


This is the hardest point to argue against as were speaking on present terms. Decapitation may be able to keep a person alive in the future but at the moment its impossible.

Fourth, regarding oil, necessity is the mother of invention. If we can't afford oil nor find oil we'll either do without it or find a substitute.

At the moment we are going into a recession. The main cause of this recession is oil. If we cant afford to invent how do u expect to get out of the recession. But yes a problem prompts people to fix it.
 
 Smito  12 Jul 2008 17:53
 1 Comment
 
 A) Regarding logic in the oil situation... If you're saying people don't have to think about logic to use it I agree. But that in no way means the current oil crisis is in fact an utter rejection of logic - as in your statement "there is no true logic". You could just as easily said "there is no true God" based on the oil crisis because all the while people were using up the oil they were happy in their belief in God. Doesn't flow.

B) The professor's application of logic - The fact he used his definitions and his logic to reach a viewpoint offensive to academic journals and his own students is confirmation of my claim that "logic" is a tool and it's how you apply the tool which makes a difference. You can't throw the tool out, but neither can you take every application of it as inviolable.

C) Decapitation - Yeah that was a weird debate point :) I'm just saying most things are relative, but not necessarily everything.

D) Oil - Yeah, we're behind the curve on a solution to oil and it's really going to hurt our economy and way of life in the meantime. I still don't think though that's a rejection of logic or that everything is relative.

Oh well. Thanks for your detailed feedback.
by  Grenache
 12 Jul 2008 18:12
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
First the discussion on oil isn't really about "logic". People may have been naive back then but it's not like they applied a rule of logic (like a=b, b=c, so a=c) to jump to the conclusion oil would last forever.

Second, "logic" is a tool. It has some definite valid applications but it isn't the answer to everything. Taken as an absolute it can be damaging. I had an odd professor in college who claimed to have used logic to prove rape is sex and he repeatedly sent manucripts to journals to publish it and was repeatedly rejected. Then he'd come to class and complain the entire academic world didn't fully understand his irrefutable logic.

Third, regarding relativity, yes I think most things in life are relative. If you compare a situation with something better or worse you can learn a lot. However, there are still some things that are absolute. If you get decapitated you die. You could compare your body with a fully decomposed skeleton and say relatively speaking you are more alive than the skeleton, but that's not really true is it? Some things are absolute fact.

Fourth, regarding oil, necessity is the mother of invention. If we can't afford oil nor find oil we'll either do without it or find a substitute.
 
 Grenache  12 Jul 2008 17:37
 Add a Comment
 
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
There Are Far More Racists Than Sexists
If Adam And Eve Were The Original Human Beings, Without Parents, Then Neither Had A Navel.
I Am FOR Hunting Mountain Lions With Dogs.
Debating Evolutionist Is Like Flogging A Dead Horse
The Military Should Not Start A Draft
Humanism Is Superior To Religion
One Million Dollars Could Make Us Happy
People Who Protest Against Medical Testing On Animals Are Hypocrites
The Mentally Challenged Can Still Get Into Heaven
Certain Races Have Certain Strong Abilities
New Debates
Nuclear Energy Is No Longer Harmful
We Should Just Say 'Merry Non-Religious Winter Solstice Event'.
CHESS: It Is Not The Game You Are Playing:
All's Fair In Love And War Is True:
Women Prefer Cyrano De Bergerac To Mr.Perfect:
Everyone, Has A "Type" They Are Attracted To Most:
Stalin Did It For The Lulz
Receive My Exports, Girls, U Know You Want To
They Walk Among Us
It's Over 9000!!!!111 It Is!!!11111@