|
|
 |
|
There is endless evidence, what it is evidence for is for each person to decide. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Yes there is evidence. Open your eyes and look around you.
It is right in front of you. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I take issue only with the word 'No' in this title (though without it there wouldn't be much debate,
so fair play).
I would agree that there is very little positive evidence for creationism and that most of the
evidence that does exist is 'a priori' which means it is not factual evidence but logical argument
which does not need facts (for example the ontological argument). However there are some examples of
evidence based arguments for the existence of God the creator as opposed to anything else. Any
example is the red-shift observation that the universe is expanding at an ever slowing rate. It is
the logical (as science has noted) that the universe therefore came at one point from a single spot,
and the question must arise of how something can exist from nothing. Whilst this is somewhat tenous,
and not entirely evidence for earth based creationism, I think it is valid.
Further to my response, but unrelated to this topic, do please comment on my debut in new
debates:
Http://www.forandagainst.com/Debates_Should_Have_A_Neutral_Column |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Devil's advocate: Creationism is true because Creation (the world) exists, and the Bible exists in
it, and the Bible confirms Creationism. So we have the world and the Bible as two data points
drawing a straight line back to Creationism.
Nobel Prize, please!! |
| |
JRL  27 Jun 2008 14:19
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Just out of curiosity, without creation, where did evolution begin? |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|