|
If your trying to find evidence in the Bible, your right.....of course, the Bible wasn't written to
make evolutionist happy, it just supplies about 2 pages to creation. If God had thought it a more
important subject, I'm sure He(she) would have told you more. But the Bible was written to tell
people how to live a better life, here and how to fit in, in heaven.
If you know anything about Quantum Physics, you know that things change and you believe and
look for them....that's where you're evidence will be found.....like the Bible said 5000 years ago,
"believe and then you will see"
A person with a closed or filled mind, doesn't have room to learn anything......especially the
truth. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
God is just an imaginary friend for adults |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Creation is fantasy and you can't prove a fantasy.
Even if evolution theory were not perfect it's still the best we've got.
The thought that a few thousand years ago fingers snapped and everything was here is utterly
LAUGHABLE. So did God stick million year old fossils in the ground just to test our faith?
It reminds me of when primitive cultures have a creation story like some big bird flew over and
dropped a magic seed from which we all sprouted. Imagine if that culture were the dominant force
today and they were saying "God, he doesn't exist, the true believers know it was that big bird who
dropped a seed. Now we must insist the big bird theory be taught in schools and both Evolution and
God's Creationism are to be debunked". Nonesense. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
It is only belief. No one has any real evidence. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
You're right, there isn't a shred of positive evidence for creationism and creationists don't even
try. All they do is try to poke holes in evolution as if that does anything whatsoever to prove
creationism is at all viable.
You have to remember that the majority of "professional creationists" are just shysters trying to
make a buck out of people's religious gullibility. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
How com everyone here is bickering? Try the flood. Its in every religion and there should be
evidence in it. Something in religion just is very much different than evolution....
And hey. Jesus did exist. And Darwin proposed a few things such as if a complex system existed in a
cell his theory would collapse. Pshh.
Darwin was brilliant nevertheless. But I know where I stand. I disagree with Darwin. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
There is endless evidence, what it is evidence for is for each person to decide. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Yes there is evidence. Open your eyes and look around you.
It is right in front of you. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I take issue only with the word 'No' in this title (though without it there wouldn't be much debate,
so fair play).
I would agree that there is very little positive evidence for creationism and that most of the
evidence that does exist is 'a priori' which means it is not factual evidence but logical argument
which does not need facts (for example the ontological argument). However there are some examples of
evidence based arguments for the existence of God the creator as opposed to anything else. Any
example is the red-shift observation that the universe is expanding at an ever slowing rate. It is
the logical (as science has noted) that the universe therefore came at one point from a single spot,
and the question must arise of how something can exist from nothing. Whilst this is somewhat tenous,
and not entirely evidence for earth based creationism, I think it is valid.
Further to my response, but unrelated to this topic, do please comment on my debut in new
debates:
Http://www.forandagainst.com/Debates_Should_Have_A_Neutral_Column |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Devil's advocate: Creationism is true because Creation (the world) exists, and the Bible exists in
it, and the Bible confirms Creationism. So we have the world and the Bible as two data points
drawing a straight line back to Creationism.
Nobel Prize, please!! |
| |
JRL  27 Jun 2008 14:19
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Just out of curiosity, without creation, where did evolution begin? |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|