» Home » The Unknown
There Could Be No Proof Sufficient To Prove Or Disprove The Divine.
How can we who live the world ever know observable natural phenomena to be of divine origin or not?
 finsch  10 Mar 2009 05:49
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
I am not as JSG suggests playing games but asking a simple question. I find it interesting that nearly everyone's response was to justify their own decision in this regard rather than describe what proof might change their mind. It seems to me that logic only takes you so far with a question of this nature then you must take a leap of some kind or remain undecided. And the reason I started this debate is I have never taken a leap and not really the leaping type. I can not imagine what evidence would convince me either way so... What would change your mind?
 
 finsch  11 Mar 2009 00:18
 4 Comments
 
 Drugs.
by  keepmindok
 11 Mar 2009 00:38
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
It's a jacked-up question. The title uses the word "sufficient" in relation to proving or disproving God. One who does not have sufficient proof doesn't have sufficient proof. One who does have sufficient proof has sufficient proof. DUH. Each is going to think the other is being an idiot if they are idiots.

Then the author of the debate convolutes the title with the explanation, tieing this sufficient proof to observable natural phenomenon. The author is well aware that science does not prove (according to scientific method) anything as fact. Most of us know about the "theory" of gravity. Currently, there is no "final truth" known about the observable universe, let alone extending this "proof" to the "not natural".

The author is playing games.

The fact is, I have sufficient proof for myself that a perfect eternal God loves me. That proof is more than sufficient for me. It is more proof for me than the sun exists. Whether my saying the proof is sufficient for me is sufficient for someone to consider the proof that is sufficient for me depends on what is sufficient for that person.

Instead, let's all keep acting like babies and try to goad one another into thinking that what is sufficient for us proves that others are simply insufficient.
 
 justsumguy  10 Mar 2009 16:06
 6 Comments
 
 You ever been choked by a demon, jsg?
by  Evileye
 10 Mar 2009 17:12
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Maybe the proof is in the pudding finschie, and that's why he made man first, simply because he didn't want a woman looking over his shoulder....;-) The old story goes '' In the beginning The mighty God of Jacob created all the heavens and the earth, and then rested. Next the Good Lord created man and sat back in admiration, and then rested. Then the Good Lord created woman, and since that day neither the Good Lord or Man has rested!''....;-) Taste the pudding and be happy with your free will, If you get mi drift?
 
 Joshua  10 Mar 2009 11:24
 Add a Comment
 
Remember when Jesus said, "If you have seen me, then you have seen the Father?"

There is already a historical notion and 'evidence' that Jesus did exist. And hey, Jesus did have a popular name so-to-say. But there is no way a person would want to get the worst beating in history unless he was crazy. And I (when I wasn't a believer) couldn't deny that this man had made grand arguments and did care for people.

Could it be that God is not that much different from us?

Some people think that God is so beyond us we cannot know him or he doesn't exist. What if the answer is so blunt that we have much more in common besides His plausible limitlessness and our finite nature?
 
 gottfried  15 Mar 2009 02:14
 Add a Comment
 
 
Because it is made up like the deities before that, so therefore, that's your proof.
 
 Balance_92  11 Mar 2009 15:10
 Add a Comment
 
 
We try to put God into a box and tell him that the only way we are going to believe he exists is for him to appear in a visual form in a way that we can hypothesize, test, and evaluate the data. The problem with this is that we can not put God into a box. He is the creator and is not subject to his creation, rather, we are subject to him. When Jesus was asked by the Pharisee's for a sign that he is who he said he is, he told them that only a wicked generation asks for a sign. I believe he said this because he was performing miracles around them everyday. Yet, because of their desire to not believe they asked him to perform a sign of their choosing. They were trying to make God their puppet. He doesn't play that game. If that is the question for this debate then I agree, there is not sufficient proof. But only because God will not allow it to be.

The bright side of the story is that he has given us proof of his existence. Romans 1:20 says "For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse." He is saying that God's creation (the universe, earth, mankind, etc...) is enough proof that he exists. Just a quick look in the mirror and we have "sufficient" proof of a creator God. Now, through modern scientific advancements, we are able to take a deeper look into the mirror and see how intricate and complex the human body really is.

According to God, he has given us sufficient proof. Even to the point that we can have no excuse for denial.
 
 created  10 Mar 2009 19:43
 2 Comments
 
 So you are saying there is nothing that could convince you there was no god? That's sort of what I'm trying to ask here is what would it take to convince someone to change their mind. Whatever side of the issue you are on. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind so please don't take this as a challenge to your ideals.
by  finsch
 11 Mar 2009 00:34
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I think we have lots of proof and the reason we do not say it is divine is because we just do not understand.

Jesus said we would be ever hearing but never understanding, we would be ever seeing but never perceiving.

For our hearts have become calloused, we harldy hear with our ears and see with our eyes. Otherwise we might see with our eyes, hear with our hears, understand with our hearts, and in turn he would heal us.

We see all kinds of "Natural Disasters" as scientists put them, you know I understand their knowledge but the biggest reason I have a problem taking them at face value is because they are man.

While there are men smarter than me, and people who make excellent discoveries or theories they will never have Gods knowledge, and because they do not I can't take what they do into account especially when they do not give God credit.

We believe in Ghosts, in Microwaves that just disappear but we can't believe in a God because he will not come down here and say 'I'm real".

Our eyes could never look upon the Lord anyways, everyone most go by thier own life experiences but when you are a child that grows not in religion, but in the ways of God himself it is very hard to disprove him.

My mother has been choked by a demon, she has been woken by God and told to pray in warfar, well she obeyed only to find out a few hours later that both of my Aunts were in a carwreck and their car flipped over an overpass onto the road beneath..

When the police officer was taking the report the truck driver who called it on said he could not believe what he saw, but he saw a hand catch the car as it was going over the over pass and lay it on the ground.

There is a reason God created us, and I'm not saying he is not all powerful, what I am saying is this Earth belongs to Satan and he gave us the power to help him Devinely Intervein.

God is a just God he is not going to break the same laws he tells you and I to follow if this is Satans Kingdom, then God might need help or a physical form to bring his power through which we have seen in so many instances in the bible.

I can share a hundred stories that is enough for me to believe, like my Grandmother sitting on the end of my bed and telling me not to suffer anymore because of her for she was in a better place.

I could say she was not bent over anymore, she did not need her oxygen she had long hair and was more beautiful than I could ever imagine, and then scientists could say I was mourning so bad that my mind took control and showed me what I needed to see.

Now I know our minds are not that nieve, when you see something you know you saw it, and it does not matter who disproves it, you know the truth.

So many Christians don't even have the blessings to see such little things and I still get worried and question, what if I die only to find I was wrong all along and still am not good enough to be in Gods presence.

What proof do we need maybe instead of asking for proof first we need to just ask God to show us that he still loves us, and needs our love in return.

So Finsch the answer to your question is what do you know or believe to be the truth? For whatever it is the choice lies with you and its a choice that will follow you everywhere in life.
 
 cherie  10 Mar 2009 16:07
 5 Comments
 
 Wow! This is fantastic stuff!
by  Evileye
 10 Mar 2009 17:11
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Sure there could be, there just isn't. I can think of a lot of things that would be sufficient evidence that a god of some sort exists. That doesn't mean that I would necessarily worship said entity, but I would certainly believe it was real. As for disproof, it's simply impossible to prove a negative, but when there's no apparent difference between the unproven and the non-existent, why believe at all?
 
 Cephus  10 Mar 2009 14:41
 6 Comments
 
 I know you don't want me to answer but you did ask a question. I think there's a significant difference between believing one is going to live eternally with a creator who loves them and thinking that anything could happen when one dies with the odds on favorite being no longer aware of ones existence.

I realize there is no way for a person who does not believe in a loving God to relate to such a thing and I also realize there is much evidence that points to the fact that such a belief is often twisted into something worse than not believing.

While we are certainly aware of the effects of twisted beliefs it would seem you pay no heed to those who believe that do not fit into your definitions of believing. I don't know you, but the odds that you have lived a life dedicated to helping the less fortunate compared to many believers I have known are slim.

I'm not saying that's proof of anything other than I see you as being extremely in the dark when it comes to defining believing in God. Even on this site where extremism will always be the norm (it's an Internet debate site), there are obviously believers who do not fit into your view defined by extremists.

There is an obvious difference between believing people are loved by their creator and thinking people are something that simply live and die along with all the other inanimate objects in this universe.

Again, I'm not saying it's proof of anything or there's anything you need to change about yourself other than to widen your view of believers and see that in the realm of reason there is an apparent difference.

Why believe? An answer from this believer?
Because you want to. Because it is you. This believer wouldn't want it any other way.
by  justsumguy
 10 Mar 2009 20:55
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
All God has to do to prove existence is appear to the world of people and prove through power and miracle and splendor that s/he exists. And the questions of WILL he do that or SHOULD he do that or must we make a LEAP OF FAITH instead is beside the point because the topic simply proposes no proof of God could ever exist. Well yes the proof could exist if God made it exist.

Skeptics who say where is this God, why doesn't s/he clarify rules or interpretations, why doesn't s/he mediate human conflicts, why do good people suffer (and on and on) ask excellent questions which deserve an answer and if they're not satisfied with the answer they're fully within their right to doubt God exists.
 
 Grenache  10 Mar 2009 10:17
 6 Comments
 
 Then the pharisees and teachers said "Teacher we want a miraculous sign from you." and he answered " A wicked and Adulterous generation ask for a miraculous sign! but none will be given it except for the sign of Jonah.

For as Jonah was 3 days and 3 nights in the belly of the whale, so will the son of man be 3 days and 3 nights in the heart of the Earth.

I think this is all God is giving us hun, its up to us to take from it what we will but you do give a very good debate I really enjoyed reading it.
by  cherie
 10 Mar 2009 15:28
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I don't know what percentage of scientists, and I doubt anyone does, but the majority of scientists are atheists. If on the other hand there was proof. We would all be a bunch of robots dictated to by scientists. Who needed proof. Doesn't sound like the sort of life I'd like to live.

I will continue to make up my own darn mind. If my magnificent imagination and CONscientce tells me there is proof, that is what I believe proff.
 
 keepmindok  10 Mar 2009 07:53
 10 Comments
 
 Actually the majority of scientists in America are Christians. By a signifigant margin.
by  finsch
 10 Mar 2009 13:40
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I strongly agree that as of right now there is no proof to disprove or prove the existence of a divine essence. Thus, I am an agnostic.

However, I realize that over time things can change, and what seemed certain have been subject to reconsideration after revolutionary phenomena s . Who knows what the distant future will bring us. There could be scientific breakthroughs that directly or indirectly leads to evidence pertaining to the support for either side.

What if the divine approached humanity, what if it proved itself? I have no reason to believe or not believe that this could happen.

There could be millions of different ways that could possibly prove or disprove the divinity. But, as of right now, there is no such proof.
 
 verum  10 Mar 2009 06:26
 4 Comments
 
 How wold you know it as divine rather than a being or creature with abilities or technology beyond ours?
by  finsch
 10 Mar 2009 13:41
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Faith Is Not Defined By One Meaning
God Has Been Lost Because Of Our Attempts As Theists To Protect Something Which Can't Be Defended Or...
Aliens Are Real
UFOs Exist
The Soul Is Priceless
Organized Religion Is Bad For Society.
All's Fair In Love And War Is True
It Is Wrong To Try And Force Your Religion On Others
Those Who Rely On God's Love And Strength Are Weaker Than Those Who Do Not.
Lucifer Isn't Such A Bad Guy
New Debates
Mother - Daughter Relationships Are Dieing Out.
Wolves Should Be Reintrouduced To Scotland.
It Is Wrong People Get Judged By The Style Of Music They Listen To.
Human Nature?
Giant Pandas Are Meant To Be Extinct.
You Can't Be Prolife And Believe In Murder
R* Games Delay Gta Episodes From Liberty City On Ps3 For Another 4 Weeks!!!
R.E Shouldn't Be A Forced Subject At Secondary School!
Aliens Are Superior To Us
Can Anything Be Considered Art? What IS The Definition Of Art?