 |
|
|
|
| Theistic Evolutionism Give Up Too Much Turf To Secular Evolutionism. |
| Even if evolution is true, and the theistic evolutionist buys into it, and says this is God's plan and work in creating man this way, the secular evolutionists will never agree because their definition of evolution is cast in stone. The BICs (Bioevolutionists In Charge) tell the other secular evolutionists what to think, and they define evolution as absolutely nondesigned, random act of natural selection. To place God behind the whole thing is totally unacceptable. Now, if the theistic evolutionist can change the definition and get "buy in" by the elite, then that's a different matter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like the idea and tone of compromise your trying to promote short of that the entire things sounds
entirely too... Like entirely too much.
Too much to interpret. Not for any given person but as a matter of practicality your proposal :
"bioevolutionists are the modern pope" so depose them?
Its the same as intelligent design-- faith-based science. Literally: "god is unacceptable"
christian scientists v. Laymen scientists
how do you make laymen sound more renowned or how do you bring the laymen up to speed to 'what's at
stake'...
Certain of the religious are willing to compromise that science is worthy of belief
"this is God's plan [so] work in creating man this way"
what would theistic evolutionist have to buy into that they haven't already likely compromised?
You may pit the evolutionist v. The religious evolutionist against each other but both of them base
their faith in stone. One's stone is simply god-made the other is fossilized carbon... They simply
can't understand the difference...
Neither should give up or be thought of as having to give up any room... Since both are human... |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Brace yourself, and take the hand of the Lord, actually it is painless, he will guide you through
all that.
At first it is all dark. But Hark...
Ten to fifteen minutes daily and you begin to see the light.Amen. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Evolution isn't "random". And who said there even is a god(s)? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The problem as I see it is that one group relies solely on the facts that are known and the other
group adds god without any proof of his existence. The first group is not necessarily against God
but against what can't be proven. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It's not about turf wars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's about the search for
TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Your proposition as worded clearly shows you are willing to run over the truth in order to achieve
political power.
Freethinkers accept the truth whatever it happens to be. Problem with religion is, it's a scam and
thinking people spot that. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 For and Against Recent Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 May 2008 00:49
Sign In
