|
I agree. Survival of the fittest is a law and wealth is the easiest way to tell who is fit and who
is unfit. We need to distinguish people who work hard from people who don't work hard. It is their
natural right to be proud of their hard work.
Also, if there was no poverty what would we rich people give charity to? Wealthy people love to
support their fellow man voluntarily in the form of charity and if there were no poor people we
couldn't be generous. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Now that the super rich country's are having a tough time poverty is worse. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Different income levels yes, however, to if you believe that the world has a necessity for poverty
you are either drunk or high, or you are such a callous being that I doubt that you are human. IF
one believes that poverty is a necessity in society I challenge you to go to Africa, Haiti, and even
here in America, to tell the child whose belly is swollen with hunger, and the millions who die of
starvation every day, tell them, their families, that their suffering is a need for the rest of
society, a society that shuns them, a place where they are not welcomed. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
That's under a capitalist society. A socialist or even a communist society have a better chance of
people not living in poverty. They are not living the life of luxury but not extreme poverty
either. Assuming all things equal with little or no corruption. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
05 Jun 2008 12:34
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
