» Home » Politics
The Way To Solve The Housing Crisis Is To Start A Large New Project Of Social Housing.
This proposal could have the following positive effects: 1. Reducing house prices because of extra supply, making housing more affordable. 2. This could increase availability of credit as there is less risk to banks as people have less to pay back. 3. Save building related industries, which in the UK have been under severe pressure and laying off workers because of lack of demand. 4. Discourage a debt fueled economy, as if more people rent houses, they are less likely to gamble on property values by re mortgaging. Problems of negative equity from falling prices are necessary and unavoidable.
 truespud  03 Oct 2008 20:56
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
Might help.
 
 AssetParis  03 Mar 2009 03:03
 Add a Comment
 
 
That is brilliant! I never thought of that! Why didn't I think of that? I could have made millions! I could have sold them on ebay!

No! I am only joking about that paragraph but it is a very good Idea full of great propositions for the future! However where would you put them I mean We are laking in space in this world! But where there's a will theirs a way and where theirs a way theirs a Will. So find yourself a boy called William and we will be away!

WHOOP!
 
 Monique  05 Oct 2008 10:26
 Add a Comment
 
 
I am not so sure it's a bad idea. The Conservative government in Britain in the eighties decided to sell off council houses to the tenants at affordable prices, with the intention of making us a nation of home owners, or conservatives.I have never fully understood why it was considered one of the greatest things they did.
For a start, surely this helped push up house prices to the over inflated state which they are today? People would buy a house from the council for say (at the time) £10,000 pounds, and the following day, could but them on the market for £40,000. This instantly made it more difficult for those starting out, looking for a house. No council houses available, and instantly inflated prices. I think this is part of the problem that is affecting the housing market today.
Then we proceed into a buy to let culture. Many people buying houses to let out, often to DHS, which left the government, or us the tax payer, paying over inflated mortgages for the letters to make profit on. Before these people would have been put into council housing.
I understand the social implications. At the time, Britain was a borderline militant country, but if you had a house to lose, you would be less inclined to want to strike, more inclined to seek, or need, employment.
There will never be a return to social housing. The ones being built in my home town are on a part share scheme, where you buy into a percentage value of the house, giving affordable means into the housing market. There is obviously not enough of them. The young people I know starting out, are often living three or four to a house or apartment, as it is the only way they can afford the rents. I would hate to be 18 and looking for my own place today. Must be near impossible.
 
 2free  04 Oct 2008 17:31
 1 Comment
 
 The idea behind selling off ouncil houses was to give people a stake in society, thereby encouraging them to be better citizens
by  Jake
 05 Oct 2008 10:29
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Well done spud what do you think the bleeding government would love to do?!? Its so easy making that claim but its not easy on an island so small, furthermore in America a social housing programme would cost so much.... Its the right idea but please think of the practicalities...
 
 Easy_uk  03 Oct 2008 21:25
 1 Comment
 
 there are many ways in which the government could find a few billion pounds for the building scheme, and it would be an investment as govt would initially at least own the houses, either sell or rent, therefore not all monwy would be lost.

The Iraq war costs more that 1.5 billion a year, how many houses could be built with that?
by  truespud
 03 Oct 2008 21:31
Comment
  
Comment
  
It would require a massive tax hike to build housing for that many people, and the extra financial strain would push even more people into foreclosure.

It would be a good idea if it could be done without raising taxes, but good luck getting the American government to pull that off.
 
 ur_wrong  04 Oct 2008 00:12
 1 Comment
 
 I'm not talking about America, UK. although if wealthy Americans actually payed their taxes, then it could probably be done.
by  truespud
 04 Oct 2008 21:26
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
So do you think people loosing half the value of their homes is the right answer? I do not.
The Banks got people into this mess by allowing them to borrow more than the property was worth speculating that the prices would rise even further.

The greatest demand for homes has come about because of opportunistic migration.

That has overloaded the housing stock more than any other factor.

The cost of Housing is related to various factors one being how much it costs to build them.
Builders will only do it for profit. Materials alone have doubled in the past few years.

Houses in the north, Manchester and Hull for instance or in Wales, that cost five thousand pounds five years ago are still selling for 25 thousand.

What sort of a life are you suggesting for the people who bought these houses thinking there dreams had come true?
 
 keepmindok  04 Oct 2008 00:05
 1 Comment
 
 The banks by lending people too much have pushed prices of homes up dispropertionately to incomes, causing the crisis as you said.
Therefore banks will not lend enough money for people to buy houses at these prices, therefore credit freezes up.

Migration has had an effect on housing prices, however capitalist speculation in the buy to let market has overwhelmingly caused unecessarily raised prices.

The fact that builders build for profit is precisely the reason state intervention is needed.

to the peoplr in the north and wales, who will probably take great delight in a new social housing scheme, so more people in the area will be able to find decent housing, which may positively regenerate the area, making it more attractive.
by  truespud
 04 Oct 2008 22:01
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
There Is A Shadow Government Running The World. Currently They Are Working On The U.S.-- Intimidating...
Voting Should Be Compulsory.
McCain's Hero Status A Delusion
Presidents Like To Show Off
The UN Play A Crucial Role In Keeping World Peace
Obama Will Prove That Everything He Said About His Campaign Is Fake!
Might Is Right
The British Government Should Tighten Immigration Laws.
Most People Here, Would Happily Live In A Meritocracy.
Unity Will Bring Our Country Together,building A Better Future For Americans
New Debates
MacDonalds Should Be Banned
Porche 911 Turbo Is A Noticable Car On The Streets.
If You Meet An Alien It Will Suck Out Your Brains.
Chicken Is Nice
That My Brother Doesn't Have A Dick
That Modern Technology Is A Plague On Human Relationships
Technology Is Tearing Us A Criminal
Technology Is Tearing Us A Part
Diet Coke And Mentos Is One Of The Best Experiments.
Vegetarians Are Not As Well Balanced As Normal People.