» Home » Society
The Media Is Claiming That The Ft Hood Shootings Could Be Terrorism Simply Because The Guy Who Did It Was Middle Eastern
If a white guy did it he wouldnt be a terrorisst, if a black guy did it i dont think they would call him a terrorist
 debatinway  06 Nov 2009 20:31
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
Very little media was or is saying it was terrorism.

I would say that most media and government officials have been doing everything they can to dance around the fact that he was a Muslim for obviously good reasons.

If someone isn't able to get through to the Muslim community pretty soon, a Muslim will do something that causes the end of Islam.

The religion was created by a warrior and it's central theme is jihad. It was immediately put to this use as a religion and while there are many who have embraced the good that was introduced into the religion (the guy wasn't an idiot), the core remains the same.

Kill those who oppose allah and get reward in Heaven for it.

They either rewrite the book or they will ulimately be destroyed.
 
 justsumguy  07 Nov 2009 17:01
 1 Comment
 
 and I think it was a Colombine instead of terrorism also.

But it was jihad in the end. There is no doubt about the fact that it was jihad.

Jihad isn't just for terrorists.
by  justsumguy
 07 Nov 2009 17:03
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
The only media calling it "terrorism" are the bigoted media, like FAUX News and Lou "bobblehead" Dobbs.

The fact that the shooter is muslim is only relevant in regard to himself being terrorized by other soldiers. The Fort Hood shootings were a Columbine, not a "jihad".

The worst part is thehypocrisy o coverup by the military brass-holes: If Hasan was a problem, why did they do nothing to prevent this? Or equally likely, they didn't know Hasan was a problem and are throwing out false accusations and assertions about him after the fact.
 
 K9  07 Nov 2009 01:32
 Add a Comment
 
 
These acts commuted by anyone regardless of nationality or ethnicity would be called acts of terrorism.
 
 tinseldove  07 Nov 2009 00:05
 Add a Comment
 
 
1.He was a Muslim
2.He condoned suicide bombing
3.He once gave a lectures to colleagues saying that non-Muslims should be burned
4.He shot soldiers about to be deployed to Afghanistan
5.He was caught on camera the day before wearing tradition Muslim clothing
 
 Homestar  06 Nov 2009 21:43
 1 Comment
 
 And I haven't heard anyone calling it terrorism.
by  Homestar
 06 Nov 2009 22:10
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Muslims Revere A Paedophile Mass Murderer Liar Madman Tyrant
Welfare Is Obviously A "Good" Thing.
Most (out Of Order) Chavs Should Be Sent To Special Schools.
Christians Can’t Debate On A Historical Jesus.
It's Immoral That News Media, Especially CNN, Learned During Katrina That Poor People In America Are...
Driving Schools Should Deicide If Someone (a Teen) Is Able To Drive By Their Maturity
Relationships Create Character And Personality.
The World Needs "Have Nots".
"People" , Are Just Monsters In Suits
If You've Got It You Should Definitely Flaunt It!...;-)
New Debates
A Little Bit Of Flooding In England Shouldn't Be Called "flooding Of Biblical Proportions"
H1N1: A Real Mystery
Edward (vampire) Is Better Than Jacob (wolf)!! TWILIGHT!!
There Is Nothing Remotely Attractive About Johnny Depp.
There Will Never Be World Peace
Degrassi Is A Good Show!!
We Should Not Be Required To Learn Spanish In School.
Islam Is Inherently More Pernicious Than Christianity
If Gays Say It's Ok To Be Gay Because It's Found In Nature, Then It's Ok For Me To Hunt And Kill Because...
Ireland Should ''SUE!'' Fifa For Negligence!