 |
|
|
 |
| The Committed, Romantic Love Shared Between 2 Gay Men Or 2 Lesbians, Is No Different That The Love Shared Between Any Opposite-gender Couple. |
| Loving hearts and commitment "until death do us part" is the same between same-gender and between opposite-gender couples. True love from 2 hearts to each other cannot be some different kind of love. Committed romantic lifelong love is not "sex" because 'sexual activities' are actions while love is from the heart. "Sex' can be between a "john" and a prostitute" and it can never be argued that love is present there. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
I agree completely but I still think Queer Eye For The Straight Guy is a lame show. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Love is love plain and simple it does not matter who loves who. As for gays ruining marriage watch
"what happens in Vegas" Dennis Miller plays a judge who says gays are not ruining the sanctity of
marriage it is people who marry without love that ruin it. If you love someone you love them no
matter if they are male or female. Morgan Freeman said hope it the best of things but I believe
love is. If you find love cherish it and the one you love no matter who you each are. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
This in my opinion is true... I agree.
Nothing can validate that two men or two women can not love each other like a hetero
couple...NOTHING |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Yes! I've said this before, but I'll say it again because I like saying it: Just because they love
thy neighbor differently doesn't mean they love them any less. And I'll do anything to defend this
point.
Thank you again, innomen. :) I don't believe we should face persecution for our life choices. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Every gay couple I’ve ever known was just as stable and boring as any hetero couple of my
acquaintance.
I’ve known several gay couples who had been together for 15-20 years, and were as
“fuddy-duddy” as any hetero union of that duration. They have the same bickering, same control
issues, same parenting issues -- what’s the big deal here?
A lesbian once told me that what pisses her off the most is when straights “go visual” on gay
intercourse. She argued that when you meet a hetero, you don’t immediately imagine her having oral
sex with a man, so why do you always do that when you meet lesbians? Of course, people “go
visual” MUCH quicker, when meeting male homosexuals.
Frankly, what “married” gays have is less perverted than many so-called “normal” hetero
marriages, when it comes to subjugation of the wives, inequality in household chores -- even marital
rape. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Of course it's the same, there's no good reason why it shouldn't be. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I agree =] Like fngrbng said. Love is love. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Certainly. Love is love, and the world needs more of it. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I'm a heterosexual male. Although i have a lesbian family member. There is nothing wrong with same
sex marriage. If it meant to be than let it be. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Absolutely. Considering the 50%+ divorce rate of heterosexual marriages, homosexual marriages could
hardly do worse. It's pure hypocrisy for anyone to claim that homosexual marriage is going to
somehow destroy heterosexual marriage. Heterosexuals are doing a pretty good job on their own. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
I don't know, Maybe I'm missing your point here, but both still have sex and with out that, both are
bound to feel the relationship is for naught, the committed
is only partly being committed to, come on now we are still human, physical beings. People hear of
opposite sex couples being able to be celibate, but put me in my place, you don't hear a whole lot
about celibate gay couples? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Previously we used to see that there are generally love and romantic relationships between two
individual of the opposite gender. But after wards things changed and now there are committed love
relationships between two individuals of the same gender. Science has approved to it and has
categorized these men to be gay and women to be lesbians. But there comes a point that do they have
the same level of commitment in their relationship like any other opposite gender relationship or is
it that their emotional structures are different. I believe that both the cases can never be the
same as 2 gay men or 2 lesbian women can love each other but the commitment between them can never
be the same like opposite gender couples have. Though science has approved to it but it can never be
like the same as any other straight oriented couple. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Yes it is they cant have kid being gay against Bible they can never raise children properly if they
do they will make there child gay |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I love homosexuals but I hate homosexuality. Likewise, I love myself but hate my sins. I need to
let the reader know.
I am not absolutely against the misleading statement above that says what the debate is about
because
It can be true that their romantic love is the same as a heterosexual pair's romantic love BUT they
were not born that way because it is a matter of choice and they chose to lust after a male, if a
male, or female, if a female. It is so obvious that man was meant to join a woman as adults with
consent. It is contrary to nature to join with one of the same gender. I don't want to go into
details with anatomy. A simple observation tells all of us the aforementioned.
The difference is clear between the cases: One is contrary to nature and the other (heterosexuality)
is not. Would you, Best4write, Cephus, Euro_Kid, fngrbng420, and jackie be for or against
bestiality? A man can claim that his pet loves him and he loves his pet just as much as a
heterosexual pair claim to love each other. What do you say? Would you be against "free love" or
not? Obviously, I am trying to corner you. If you can't answer, you might report me as "abusive" but
I am not. I LOVE HOMOSEXUALS. They are just like anyone else in the world who is not satisfied with
what the world offers them. I am not satisfied with the world, either.
P.S. I am not homophobic. I love them. There is no point in having a debate if there is no debating. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
For and Against Recent Activity
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|