» Home » Love & Relationship
The Committed, Romantic Love Shared Between 2 Gay Men Or 2 Lesbians, Is No Different That The Love Shared Between Any Opposite-gender Couple.
Loving hearts and commitment "until death do us part" is the same between same-gender and between opposite-gender couples. True love from 2 hearts to each other cannot be some different kind of love. Committed romantic lifelong love is not "sex" because 'sexual activities' are actions while love is from the heart. "Sex' can be between a "john" and a prostitute" and it can never be argued that love is present there.
 best4write  14 Feb 2008 23:05
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
I agree completely but I still think Queer Eye For The Straight Guy is a lame show.
 
 finsch  04 Feb 2009 01:29
 Add a Comment
 
 
Love is love plain and simple it does not matter who loves who. As for gays ruining marriage watch "what happens in Vegas" Dennis Miller plays a judge who says gays are not ruining the sanctity of marriage it is people who marry without love that ruin it. If you love someone you love them no matter if they are male or female. Morgan Freeman said hope it the best of things but I believe love is. If you find love cherish it and the one you love no matter who you each are.
 
 boy2girl31  30 Jun 2008 21:20
 Add a Comment
 
 
This in my opinion is true... I agree.
Nothing can validate that two men or two women can not love each other like a hetero couple...NOTHING
 
 Zman676  24 Jun 2008 00:55
 Add a Comment
 
 
Yes! I've said this before, but I'll say it again because I like saying it: Just because they love thy neighbor differently doesn't mean they love them any less. And I'll do anything to defend this point.

Thank you again, innomen. :) I don't believe we should face persecution for our life choices.
 
 veggiefry  01 May 2008 00:23
 2 Comments
 
 My hero.
by  innomen
 01 May 2008 00:40
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Every gay couple I’ve ever known was just as stable and boring as any hetero couple of my acquaintance.
I’ve known several gay couples who had been together for 15-20 years, and were as “fuddy-duddy” as any hetero union of that duration. They have the same bickering, same control issues, same parenting issues -- what’s the big deal here?
A lesbian once told me that what pisses her off the most is when straights “go visual” on gay intercourse. She argued that when you meet a hetero, you don’t immediately imagine her having oral sex with a man, so why do you always do that when you meet lesbians? Of course, people “go visual” MUCH quicker, when meeting male homosexuals.
Frankly, what “married” gays have is less perverted than many so-called “normal” hetero marriages, when it comes to subjugation of the wives, inequality in household chores -- even marital rape.
 
 chispa  27 Apr 2008 23:52
 2 Comments
 
 You wouldn't believe how many people, and who, have asked me who the top is. Does a straight person get asked what positions they take in the bedroom?
by  innomen
 01 May 2008 00:54
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Of course it's the same, there's no good reason why it shouldn't be.
 
 Shizenk  05 Apr 2008 11:28
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree =] Like fngrbng said. Love is love.
 
 jackie  19 Feb 2008 18:51
 Add a Comment
 
 
Certainly. Love is love, and the world needs more of it.
 
 fngrbng420  16 Feb 2008 17:59
 Add a Comment
 
 
I'm a heterosexual male. Although i have a lesbian family member. There is nothing wrong with same sex marriage. If it meant to be than let it be.
 
 Euro_Kid  15 Feb 2008 03:13
 Add a Comment
 
 
Absolutely. Considering the 50%+ divorce rate of heterosexual marriages, homosexual marriages could hardly do worse. It's pure hypocrisy for anyone to claim that homosexual marriage is going to somehow destroy heterosexual marriage. Heterosexuals are doing a pretty good job on their own.
 
 Cephus  15 Feb 2008 01:12
 3 Comments
 
 What's the divorce rate got to do with anything?
by  Mark
 24 Jun 2008 00:57
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
I don't know, Maybe I'm missing your point here, but both still have sex and with out that, both are bound to feel the relationship is for naught, the committed
is only partly being committed to, come on now we are still human, physical beings. People hear of opposite sex couples being able to be celibate, but put me in my place, you don't hear a whole lot about celibate gay couples?
 
 Bacchus  21 Jun 2008 03:04
 2 Comments
 
 Um, couple wise, yeah they are out there. More than you might think...
by  Zman676
 24 Jun 2008 00:44
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Previously we used to see that there are generally love and romantic relationships between two individual of the opposite gender. But after wards things changed and now there are committed love relationships between two individuals of the same gender. Science has approved to it and has categorized these men to be gay and women to be lesbians. But there comes a point that do they have the same level of commitment in their relationship like any other opposite gender relationship or is it that their emotional structures are different. I believe that both the cases can never be the same as 2 gay men or 2 lesbian women can love each other but the commitment between them can never be the same like opposite gender couples have. Though science has approved to it but it can never be like the same as any other straight oriented couple.
 
 sudipa  10 Mar 2008 04:06
 1 Comment
 
 why?, you read off as a smart individual, so please explain why you assume heterosexual relationships have more commitment...
by  Zman676
 21 Jun 2008 02:43
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Yes it is they cant have kid being gay against Bible they can never raise children properly if they do they will make there child gay
 
 vgking13  06 Mar 2008 21:51
 2 Comments
 
 Just like how heterosexual parents never have homosexual children?
by  Damian
 01 May 2008 00:25
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I love homosexuals but I hate homosexuality. Likewise, I love myself but hate my sins. I need to let the reader know.
I am not absolutely against the misleading statement above that says what the debate is about because
It can be true that their romantic love is the same as a heterosexual pair's romantic love BUT they were not born that way because it is a matter of choice and they chose to lust after a male, if a male, or female, if a female. It is so obvious that man was meant to join a woman as adults with consent. It is contrary to nature to join with one of the same gender. I don't want to go into details with anatomy. A simple observation tells all of us the aforementioned.
The difference is clear between the cases: One is contrary to nature and the other (heterosexuality) is not. Would you, Best4write, Cephus, Euro_Kid, fngrbng420, and jackie be for or against bestiality? A man can claim that his pet loves him and he loves his pet just as much as a heterosexual pair claim to love each other. What do you say? Would you be against "free love" or not? Obviously, I am trying to corner you. If you can't answer, you might report me as "abusive" but I am not. I LOVE HOMOSEXUALS. They are just like anyone else in the world who is not satisfied with what the world offers them. I am not satisfied with the world, either.
P.S. I am not homophobic. I love them. There is no point in having a debate if there is no debating.
 
 Stranger  15 Feb 2008 19:53
 3 Comments
 
 You say you LOVE HOMOSEXUALS. Do you have any friends who are gay? If so, why don't you talk seriously about being gay and you will learn they have only one choice: whether or not to 'come out' and let others know that you are gay. And, you will learn that the attraction is NOT of the genitals and intercourse! The attraction is from the heart as with straights/breeders/heterosexuals...just as your heart has maybe had a 'crush' or fallen in love with someone wonderful. We love from a romantic heart and choose to have a committed longtime relationship just as heterosexuals do. Just as some heterosexuals have paid-for intercourse with prostitutes, there are some homosexuals who pay-for prostitutes. But, as with heterosexuals, those "johns" are few in number compared with to total population of heterosexuals or gays. Our beloved is truly loved "until death do us part."
by  best4write
 07 Mar 2008 06:19
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Love Is The Greatest Thing!
The Law Regarding Incest Should Be Changed
Men Always Do The Heartbreaking
Having A Boyfriend/girlfriend In High School Causes Lots Of Unnecessary Drama.
Dating At A Young Age[5-10] Is Wrong
Both Genders And It's Pretty Normal
Guys Come Owners Manuals
It Is All About "Conquering" And The Hunt
Love Can Destroy Your Life But It Can Also Repair It Or Make It Complete
When You Ain't Got Nothing You Ain't Got Nothing At All!...;-)
New Debates
There Are Not Many Straight Men Left In The World...; )
Percentages (for And Against) Seldom If Ever Reflect The Truth About Anything, General Elections For...
Only Morons Think Bands Of The Past And Present Weren't Influenced By The Beatles
That Smokers Should Be Denied Access To Medicare
The Moden Technology Is A Plague Human Relationships
We All Have A Fictional Character Which We Secretly Want To Be.
Race Is An Outmoded And Increasingly Ineffective Classification System For The Human Race
Taylor Swifts You Belong With Me Song/video Is Really Good, Happy, Feelgood, Cheesy, Uplifting Song!
This Really Is A Very Good, Very Interesting, Knowledegable Site.
We Need More Meats On Sticks