» Home » History
The Civil War Was Not About Slavery, It Should Not Be Taught That Way In Schools Today
Civil war 1861-1865, emancipation proclamation Jan 1, 1863. Even then the emancipation proclamation only freed slaves in the southern held territories. It was a ploy by the north to add troops and credibility to the fight. So why are kids coming home from school saying they learned that the civil war was fought over slavery? Do you think the civil war was fought over slavery?
 Driver  08 May 2008 04:11
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
Slavery was not the "main cause". There were several causes that acted mutually to split the country apart. I've had several history teachers, two of the college professors, tell me the same thing: Slavery was a minor cause in the civil war, it was used as an excuse to start the war though.
 
 wallaceg12  19 May 2008 23:20
 Add a Comment
 
 
I understand that, as far as I can remember about history, slaves need
within this country, method for bringing
them in and the ports were most likely
established up north first, so what- the north all of the sudden developed a
sense of guilt. Yeah right.
 
 Bacchus  08 May 2008 14:55
 Add a Comment
 
 
You're absolutely right. The history of the war is falsified not only at the popular level, but also the academic level. American historians have an unfortunate tendency to mythologise their own history, and try to find some noble ideal lurking in the often much more murky facts.

The truth is that Lincoln wanted to expel all blacks from America. He was a member of the American Colonization society whose purpose was to send the blacks back to Africa or elsewhere on the American continent. He thought whites and blacks could never live harmoniously together. When Lincoln expressed this view to prominent black leaders, like Frederick Douglass, they were shocked by what he had said, and told him they were as American as he was. Lincoln's ethnic cleansing plans weren't just ideas either. He actually tried to implement them.

Even during the war he paid for a trial colonization scheme in which a few hundred blacks were made to go and live somewhere else in Latin America (Panama I think, off the top of my head) and work in a mine there so they could pay back the cost of their passage. In the end, I think they all died of disease. After the war, Lincoln planned not to turn the slaves into free Americans, but to expel them from the country altogether. In this respect, he resembled Hitler, who originally only wanted to expel the Jews from Germany rather than exterminate them.

Part of the problem with the falsification of civil war history stems from the fact that Lincoln died young. We have a tendency to mythologise people who died young and make more of them than they really deserved. Witness JFK who escalated the Vietnam war and accomplished very little (other than preventing a third world war during the Cuban Missile Crisis, which, admittedly, is far from negligible).
 
 Hidell  08 May 2008 14:38
 2 Comments
 
 Wow...how wrong you are!
by  Maggie1
 15 May 2008 01:17
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
One of the issues of the Civil War was slavery, that much is true. But I was never taught that it was BECAUSE of slavery that the Civil War was fought. I was always taught it was because of the secession of states from the Union. Slavery just happened to be a heated issue at the time.
 
 The_Alex  08 May 2008 04:16
 2 Comments
 
 Knowledge is power.
Don't you just love facts!!
by  Bacchus
 08 May 2008 04:20
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Umm I wasn't taught that.. I was taught it was because the south wanted to separate from the US and become it's own little country....over things other than slavery. Ignorance has caused people to forget what they were taught in 4th grade.
 
 hodver  12 Jan 2009 04:20
 Add a Comment
 
 
Kids don't come home saying that because they're taught that. Kids say that because all the issues unrelated to slavery don't appeal to their empathetic sensibilities. Do you really think they know what the word civil means? Let alone the ironic concept of a civil war?
 
 characters  05 Jul 2008 08:19
 Add a Comment
 
 
The way I learned it is the South wanted to secede because Lincoln wanted to free the slaves. That about covers it!
 
 Wolffe  27 May 2008 07:12
 1 Comment
 
 then how do you explain that the war started 2 years before the emancipation proclamation? war 2 years before any mention of freeing slaves? and the emancipation proclamation only freed slaves in confederate teritories?
by  Driver
 25 Jul 2008 17:35
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
What the heck do you THINK the Civil War was about? Believe it or not, America didn't decide to have a war for fun. There were many factors unrelated to slavery, but it was the main cause.
 
 Maggie1  15 May 2008 01:17
 2 Comments
 
 It was about preventing secession.
by  Hidell
 15 May 2008 01:45
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
America Should Have Gotten Involved In World War 1
Most Wars Are Started Because Of Religious Differences.
Joe McCarthy Was A Good Catholic
Napoleon Was Unlucky To Lose The Battle Of Waterloo.
There Is Not More Evidence For The Existence Of Jesus Christ Than There Is For Julius Caesar.
A Global Flu Pandemic Could Be Averted If We Started Closing Our Countries And Boarders.
Princess Diane Was Not As Good Of A Person As She Was Perceived To Be.
Without Nerds/Geeks There Would Be No Cars Computers Etc.
Hitler Is Still Alive
Hitler Did Do One Thing Right, He Knew How To Talk.
New Debates
Is Hydrogen Poroxide A Good Ingredien For Experiments Like Elephant Toothpaste.
MacDonalds Should Be Banned
Porche 911 Turbo Is A Noticable Car On The Streets.
If You Meet An Alien It Will Suck Out Your Brains.
Chicken Is Nice
That My Brother Doesn't Have A Dick
That Modern Technology Is A Plague On Human Relationships
Technology Is Tearing Us A Criminal
Technology Is Tearing Us A Part
Diet Coke And Mentos Is One Of The Best Experiments.