|
I am sure it would be well received by Wisconsin. As for Southern California. Hollywood and Vegas
were made for each other.
Borders change over time don't they. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I think we should make northern California a part of Nevada and make Las Vegas and its surrounding
area a part of California.
Northern and southern California don't have a lot in common anyways, and Las vegas would fit in well
with southern California.
I also think we should consider giving northern michigan (as in the part above lake michigan) to
Wisconsin. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Disagree.
Who would draw these new borders:
Congress? Have you seen the Congressional district maps after a reapportionment? It looks like a
shattered window.
The states themselves? Did you know that there was a dispute between New York and New Jersey as to
who owns Ellis Island? It lasted from 1834 to 1998 when the Supreme Court said that it belongs
"mostly to New Jersey."
You? Maybe Wisconsin doesn't want the UP. Too much trouble. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
You're probably right that there would be a better way to divide borders, but it would cause so much
confusion, maps would have to be redrawn, and people would have to change their mailing address so
much that it just wouldn't be worth it. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I don't think so |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
07 Oct 2008 23:08
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
