» Home » Shopping
TV Advertising Is A Waste Of Money And Doesn't Convince Viewers To Invest In A Particular Product!!!!!!!
TV Advertising is current in nearly all TV channels, and when there is a break in a TV show and the ads come on i just walk away because i couldn't care less about a new toothpaste brand or a sale on at Target on men's and children's clothing!!! And i am not persuaded at all to purchase a particular product!! In my opinion they are a complete waste of time and money! What do you think???
 F18Aviator  31 Mar 2008 15:23
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
Who listens to that "My little pony" jingle?
 
 frederick  07 Apr 2009 17:51
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree. I use my DiVo just so I can skip the commercials.
 
 jaykaywy  04 Mar 2009 05:02
 Add a Comment
 
 
Most ignore commercials or leave the room for a snack at the commercial time, or use the remote to change the channel.
 
 AssetParis  17 Feb 2009 23:15
 Add a Comment
 
 
(see comment above) but i don't like TV advertising, and am not effected by it!
 
 F18Aviator  01 Apr 2008 08:37
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree. People almost always ignore ads for pretty much anything. I always mute the TV, or change channel, when ads come on. Everyone I know does, as well. Most TV shows are about 40% ads and 60% actual show. I don't know anyone who actually pays any attention to TV ads.
 
 Dan4096  01 Apr 2008 01:15
 Add a Comment
 
A WASTE of money? You have to be kidding...
 
 luhg  19 Apr 2008 23:34
 1 Comment
 
 SPAM noob.
by  Dan4096
 22 Oct 2008 07:23
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Well its not right because TV creates mass awareness about a product and than it pushes the customer to buy the product for once at least and if the product got quality than the customer will surely re-buy it. And above all children always force their parents to buy anything concerned to them. So, TV ads do serve the purpose for the companies and money is not wasted at all.
 
 Proactive  03 Apr 2008 17:10
 Add a Comment
 
 
It must be worth it because companies have a huge budget for it. If it wasn't worth it then they simply wouldn't advertise.

I wonder when the time will come when it does not become financially viable. The onset of Sky+ may change things (you can save any TV you want to watch and play it back when you are ready) I now just fast forward the adverts so very rarely do I ever need to sit through them. As this media becomes the norm advertisers will not shell out so much money for them.
 
 StBalders  01 Apr 2008 08:49
 Add a Comment
 
 
I think Television commercials sometimes work. If I happened to need new mascara and a commercial came on for a brand of mascara, I would be more likely to buy it.

The reason stations have commercials is so that we can watch TV for free. If the advertisers weren't paying for commercials, it would be us paying.
 
 vintglam94  01 Apr 2008 01:23
 Add a Comment
 
 
I see a commercial for a theme park, I go online, I get tickets, I just paid money. Does TV advertising always work? No, of course not. But it often can.
 
 TyWhyHiTy  01 Apr 2008 01:12
 Add a Comment
 
 
If television advertising was, in fact, a waste of money, then companies would not pay tens of thousands of dollars (as a bare minimum amount) for ads that run less than 30 seconds. Additionally, major political parties and lobby groups would stop spending most of their marketing budget on television-based ads, and all those commercial shopping channels would have long gone out of business.

Television advertising clearly works very well, especially if these ads are shown during peak viewing hours, or in the middle of popular television shows and movies. For example, during the Super Bowl, companies were willing to fork out as much as $2.7 million for 30 second TV ads. Most companies keep very close tabs on the effectiveness of their marketing campaigns. If it would not have been proven to work, then most corporations would have pulled their ads in short order.
 
 mackenzie  31 Mar 2008 15:32
 Add a Comment
 
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Aeropostale Is Better Than Abercrombie And Fitch
Factories Shouldn't Make Slutty Halloween Costumes
Valentines Day Is Just A Way For Retailers To Gain Extra Money
"Planned Obsolescence" Should Be Avoided
Stores Should Include Sales Tax In Their Prices.
Sox Are Cool:)
Specer's Gifts Should Be Shut Down
I Think That Clothes Should Be Less Expensive Than What They Are.
The New Star Trek Film Should Not Have Been Shown In Cinemas
A Man Should Be Able To Buy A Dress Without Getting Funny Looks
New Debates
Is Halloween Better Then Christmas?
They Should Relax The Language Censor A Bit.
A Little Bit Of Flooding In England Shouldn't Be Called "flooding Of Biblical Proportions"
H1N1: A Real Mystery
Edward (vampire) Is Better Than Jacob (wolf)!! TWILIGHT!!
There Is Nothing Remotely Attractive About Johnny Depp.
There Will Never Be World Peace
Degrassi Is A Good Show!!
We Should Not Be Required To Learn Spanish In School.
Islam Is Inherently More Pernicious Than Christianity