» Home » Shopping
TV Advertising Is A Waste Of Money And Doesn't Convince Viewers To Invest In A Particular Product!!!!!!!
TV Advertising is current in nearly all TV channels, and when there is a break in a TV show and the ads come on i just walk away because i couldn't care less about a new toothpaste brand or a sale on at Target on men's and children's clothing!!! And i am not persuaded at all to purchase a particular product!! In my opinion they are a complete waste of time and money! What do you think???
 F18Aviator  31 Mar 2008 15:23
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
Who listens to that "My little pony" jingle?
 
 frederick  07 Apr 2009 17:51
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree. I use my DiVo just so I can skip the commercials.
 
 jaykaywy  04 Mar 2009 05:02
 Add a Comment
 
 
Most ignore commercials or leave the room for a snack at the commercial time, or use the remote to change the channel.
 
 AssetParis  17 Feb 2009 23:15
 Add a Comment
 
 
(see comment above) but i don't like TV advertising, and am not effected by it!
 
 F18Aviator  01 Apr 2008 08:37
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree. People almost always ignore ads for pretty much anything. I always mute the TV, or change channel, when ads come on. Everyone I know does, as well. Most TV shows are about 40% ads and 60% actual show. I don't know anyone who actually pays any attention to TV ads.
 
 Dan4096  01 Apr 2008 01:15
 Add a Comment
 
A WASTE of money? You have to be kidding...
 
 luhg  19 Apr 2008 23:34
 1 Comment
 
 SPAM noob.
by  Dan4096
 22 Oct 2008 07:23
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Well its not right because TV creates mass awareness about a product and than it pushes the customer to buy the product for once at least and if the product got quality than the customer will surely re-buy it. And above all children always force their parents to buy anything concerned to them. So, TV ads do serve the purpose for the companies and money is not wasted at all.
 
 Proactive  03 Apr 2008 17:10
 Add a Comment
 
 
It must be worth it because companies have a huge budget for it. If it wasn't worth it then they simply wouldn't advertise.

I wonder when the time will come when it does not become financially viable. The onset of Sky+ may change things (you can save any TV you want to watch and play it back when you are ready) I now just fast forward the adverts so very rarely do I ever need to sit through them. As this media becomes the norm advertisers will not shell out so much money for them.
 
 StBalders  01 Apr 2008 08:49
 Add a Comment
 
 
I think Television commercials sometimes work. If I happened to need new mascara and a commercial came on for a brand of mascara, I would be more likely to buy it.

The reason stations have commercials is so that we can watch TV for free. If the advertisers weren't paying for commercials, it would be us paying.
 
 vintglam94  01 Apr 2008 01:23
 Add a Comment
 
 
I see a commercial for a theme park, I go online, I get tickets, I just paid money. Does TV advertising always work? No, of course not. But it often can.
 
 TyWhyHiTy  01 Apr 2008 01:12
 Add a Comment
 
 
If television advertising was, in fact, a waste of money, then companies would not pay tens of thousands of dollars (as a bare minimum amount) for ads that run less than 30 seconds. Additionally, major political parties and lobby groups would stop spending most of their marketing budget on television-based ads, and all those commercial shopping channels would have long gone out of business.

Television advertising clearly works very well, especially if these ads are shown during peak viewing hours, or in the middle of popular television shows and movies. For example, during the Super Bowl, companies were willing to fork out as much as $2.7 million for 30 second TV ads. Most companies keep very close tabs on the effectiveness of their marketing campaigns. If it would not have been proven to work, then most corporations would have pulled their ads in short order.
 
 mackenzie  31 Mar 2008 15:32
 Add a Comment
 
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Hollister Is Too Expensive
For A Kid The Box A Present Comes In May Be More Stimulating Than The Present Itself
It's A Waste Of Money To Buy Something That Is Purely Ornamental
Children Should Be Sent To The Mall By Themselves.
People Should Spend Less On Unneeded Things
You Shouldn't Judge A Book By It's Front Cover, But It's Fine To Judge A Book By The Summary On The Back...
Stores Should Include Sales Tax In Their Prices.
A Man Should Be Able To Buy A Dress Without Getting Funny Looks
There Should Be A Shopping Annonymous For People Who Can't Stop Shopping.
Specer's Gifts Should Be Shut Down
New Debates
Can Anything Be Considered Art? What IS The Definition Of Art?
For And Against Should Provide A Link To The List Of Words The Censor Won't Let Us Use. They Can Require...
Students Should Learn A Physical Trade To Graduate Highschool~
Biblical Views Regarding Women Are Utterly Outdated And Should Be Ignored.
Planned Parenthood Is A Bad Thought
The Single Most Effective Action America Could Take To Reduce The Problem With Illegal Immigration Would...
Grey Is The Best Fashion-Color:
You Always Have A Choice
Cocks Are Better Than Hens!
America Will Not Have The Grandeur That Rome Once Had.