|
Humans take and never give and those stupid condominiums are too damb expensive anyway so animal
loving people are not guaranteed their pals' land
as for animal testing not only is it mean but has any body ever thought that testing on human DNA
alone could find a cure for cancer |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
You're completely right. I'm glad someone gets it for once. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
If we were all in danger of catching a horrible disease, ( always a real threat) the only likely
hope was to find the answer through vivisection, then who would be against it.?
The majority do not believe that would be cruelty to animals. In fact it might well be construed as
failing to utilize animals full potential. Jerseygrl
As far as tearing down the natural habitat of endangering species, and other wild life, I agree more
should be done to protect it. It proves difficult to prevent indigenous people to stop exploiting
their environment. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Are you saying that we should forego civilization and all our benefits in order to preserve the
natural order?? If so it is a foolish thought, as we have won our position on top, which allows us
to do animal testing as animals are weaker things fit only to be used by us, also the animals either
have to learn to live in our habitats or die out, it is a natural process of selection and mutation. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
22 Jul 2008 01:04
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
