|
Life was valued far more back then! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Life was hard but good |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
If you have a time machine we'll do it. Oh, what you don't? O h well, I tried. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It isn't easy to turn the clock back but we should treat everything as recyclable. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It's too late society has become too advanced to turn back now, or we could face extinction. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
You are assuming that if we stop using cars it will fix the problem and all the damage will be
undone. That's not true with all the gases in the atmosphere blocking the light from going out we
cant assume they will just go away. Yes bikes would be better then cars at this point in time but we
can't fix the problem just by stopping the use of cars. Big factories produce a lot of pollution so
to fix the problem your way we'd have to shut down all polluting factories, energy plants, and other
polluting areas. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
How about this one, buy me a bike or some other form of efficient transportation, then ill give up
my car for a week.
"BUT GLOBAL WARMING LOLZZ!!"
Oh yeah i forgot, i would give up my..... Oops, global warming is crap; it'
s called climate change.
Sorry :D |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No. We need the technology used nowadays to do anything.
What we should do is leap ahead to the future and improve the technology so it leaves less of an
imprint, not devolve our society.
Without technology, we couldn't have disaster warning systems for hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis,
etc. We wouldn't have as efficient of a press. Our leaders wouldn't be able to communicate as much.
There'd be a severe block on information due to lack of the internet. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
09 May 2008 11:09
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
