|
|
 |
|
A theory can’t be fake, only wrong. They are researching it, will continue to research it, and
have been researching it for a long time. We have a relatively complete overview of what went on in
the thermal expansion that resulted in our little universe that is except for the first few
billionths of a second and to the physics or nature of what existed before the BB.
So I’m curious the technology that has been used to study the Cosmic Microwave Background
Radiation, which is the strongest evidence for the BB is very similar to the technology that is used
for various medical diagnostic devices. Would you be willing to accept treatment based on those
imaging techniques, or are they fake as well? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I say no because there's no way for scientists to simulate it. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Not that you are jumping to conclusions or anything...
Regardless though, the BB theory doesn't 'need research' because it is the product of research. You
think scientists thought "hey, we've got no idea about how the universe started, no evidence, no
observations, nothing. Let's invent a theory, from scratch, and then just take it from there."
Science works by fitting theories to the evidence, not vice versa. The BB theory is the best
rational we have for the evidence we have. More research is always needed, but not into the theory,
into the physics which we fit the theory on. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
25 Nov 2008 18:55
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
