» Home » Health
There Should Be An Amendment That The Prohibits The Production, The Use, And The Distribution Of Cigarettes.
Cigarettes kills more people a year than any illegal drug to my knowledge. And yet there are no concerns with banning them.
 Kognizant  16 Apr 2008 17:05
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
Agreed. It's bad enough that lung cancer is occurring and those who smoke don't make an effort to make others realize how bad it is.
 
 imright20  06 Oct 2008 22:37
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree. Cigarettes are just not worth the risk. However, if the gov. Did make it illegal, the black market and drug dealers would flourish off of selling illegal cigarettes. There is always a negative aspect....
 
 Skave  15 May 2008 18:41
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree. It's about time cigarettes were banned. They are dangerous to both smokers and non-smokers and they smell awful. I can not stand the smell of the smoke when someone near me is smoking.
 
 louise23  19 Apr 2008 22:08
 Add a Comment
 
 
Yes, I believe there should be something to ban the making and seloling of cigarettes. As long as companies keep making them and people keep paying the ridiculous cost, people are still going to be dying from them. Banning them from restaraunts and bars in OH was a good idea but what about everywhere else? Secondhand smoke is everywhere. If they are taking such precautions such as banning them in these places, why not just ban them altogether?
 
 curious  17 Apr 2008 01:53
 Add a Comment
 
 
Yes, they should come up with a law or something that bans cigarettes and alcohol all together. There is absolutely nothing good about cigarettes and you are correct in saying that they kill many people each year. Not only do they make people sick, they also stink. People who smoke cigarettes stink. Their clothes stink, their hair stinks, and anything they touch will stink. People who smoke are dirty. It is not fair for the clean people of the world to have to breathe in their second hand smoke and die. Each year, innocent people also die because of second hand smoke. Shouldn't this be considered murder?
 
 Professor  17 Apr 2008 01:24
 Add a Comment
 
My thoughts are right on with phoenix and jsh4.

The point of my government is not to tell me what I can and can't do but to make sure that everyone is being honest: Telling me what's good or what's bad for me.
I can figure out what I want to do all by myself.

Second hand smoke should be taken more seriously though. I go to a community college and the smoke is disgusting.
 
 JohnShier  22 Apr 2008 02:44
 Add a Comment
 
 
Absolutely not. All you would be doing is starting a brand-new, unwinnable "war on drugs". Let's face it, prohibition didn't work, and the "war on drugs" isn't ever going to be won. The majority of people are going to do what they want to do regardless whether it's illegal or not. All you're going to be doing is making the smokers criminals. And have you thought about how we might punish the violators? The prisons are already much too crowded. Just because something might be bad for you does not mean I want the government to tell me whether or not I can use it! I am an adult capable of thinking for myself. The companies who make harmful products should be required by law to make me aware of the potential dangers, (which they currently do) and let me make my own decision. Making anything potentially harmful illegal is absurd.
 
 phoenix  18 Apr 2008 16:11
 Add a Comment
 
 
Although one may think that such a law would save millions of lives, prevents thousands of cases of cancer and other cigarette-related illnesses, making such a law would merely cause havoc; though there are nicotine patches, ways of giving up, etc. It would simply be out of the question to remove cigarettes from the lives of smokers completely.

First of all, there is the question of smokers' rights-there would be a public outcry, protests, violence, and perhaps more.

Secondly, the millions of smokers out there would simply find other ways of obtaining cigarettes, and many would most certainly resort to violence and crime.
 
 jsh4  17 Apr 2008 01:55
 Add a Comment
 
 
Of course there are concerns... But government isn't the way to get over our addictions... There's too many other things going on right now to add removing the luxury of smoking to what's making people tense... Can't wait for the day though
 
 characters  16 Apr 2008 17:15
 Add a Comment
 
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Kids Should Have A Curfew On Weekdays And Weekends
You Should Pay A Pound Every Time You See A Doctor Or The Dentist. Or Any Health Professional.
Alcohol And Smoking Aren't Good For Your Health
They Should Come Out With A Real Solution For Obesity.
Being A Vegan Is Not Good For Your Health
Jehovah's Witness Should Be Able To Have A Blood Transplant, Sex, And Alcohol.
Germs Are Good For Us.
Morbidly Obese People Should Not Get Free Treatment On The NHS.
BMI (body Mass Index) Is Unrealistic.
It's Not Fair That Hospital, Medical Bills Be Put On T R W 's To Wreck Our Credit
New Debates
The Simpsons Is One Of The Best Cartoons Of All Time?
Energy Can Be Created And Destroyed
The Design Theory Is Flawed.
The Bible Was Written By Naive People.
Having A Boyfriend/girlfriend In High School Causes Lots Of Unnecessary Drama.
A Likely Reason Why Students Are Forced To Take Classes That They Don't Really Need For The Major They...
Sneezing When Looking At A Bright Light Is Caused By The Microbes In The Nose Reacting To The Light....
There Should Be Mild Sedatives In Prison Food.
Many Atheists Have Been Hurt By The Myths Of Santa, The Tooth Fairy And Easter Bunny. They Believed...
Fatties Should Take A Tip From Smokers. To Ward Off Those Cravings For Chips They Should Sellotape A...