|
I feel that nuclear power should be available for use to combat climate change in the U.K. As global
warming is showing signs of havoc, not only are people going to suffer from diseases caused by
excess of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere .If the earth is not protected by them how will we people
depend upon it for sustenance. Nuclear power and its energy saves us from global warming intolerable
heat waves and rise in sea levels can be kept in check to a certain degree with its nuclear energy
source which will be safe for human civilization to follow. This is why I feel that O.K. Should have
nuclear power .Climatic catastrophe is occurring due to gases and temperatures are rising.
Acceleration of global warming in the O.K. Needs immediate attention and if nuclear power is there
in the U.K. It will be beneficial. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I don't care cause i don't live in the UK but yeah nuclear power is better for the environment so
yeah they should have it! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No one is thrilled by the idea of having nuclear power stations near them. There is the suggested
link with cancer and, of course, the danger of an accident; but I agree with you that the ecological
and energy resource situation on the planet is so critical that we should be seriously ramping up
our use of nuclear power.
Global warming is approaching the tipping points which will make it irreversible. Whatever the risks
from nuclear power are, they are nowhere near those of global warming. And even apart from the
polluting effects of our use of coal and oil is the fact that our supplies of them are running out.
Oil is already at $100 a barrel and the industrialization of China and India means demand for it is
only going to increase.
Even James Love lock, noted environmentalist and author of the Gaia hypothesis, has now come out in
favor of nuclear power. At this stage, it's the only responsible choice to make. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
When i think of nuclear power i think of Chernobyl
and the nuclear waste that comes from it is very bad for the environment |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Having seen the results from what can happen due to human error, either by bad work practices or bad
design issues, i am not in favour of nuclear power.
If there is a major problem with conventional power stations, yes a lot of people could die or get
injured ,due to it's immediate affects, but if a nuclear power station, how ever remote that
possibility may be, goes up, millions of people may be affected, thousands of miles away, in
different countries.
It's just too dangerous, and i have not even got to it's by products, storage, transporting nuclear
materials, terrorists etc. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
With new and more powerful green technologies being discovered just months apart I think that if we
focus our resources we will not only meet our power needs faster but in the long run cheaper and we
won't have the health risk or have to put more toxic waste into the environment |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
27 Feb 2008 23:20
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
