» Home » Miscellaneous
It Should Be 3 Strikes You Go To Jail
Well I'm for it because well let's say someone is hitting you and that person you love and you don't want that person to get mad at you or hit you again so if you have this law it could put him away and it wouldn't be your fault
 B_U_G_  17 Mar 2008 22:25
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
People should only have 3 tries because the first time it might be an accident by the 3 time you know its on purpose.
 
 B_U_G_  17 Mar 2008 22:47
 Add a Comment
 
100% stupid. As someone said earlier, if you kill two persons, you're okay but if , afterwards, you steal a bag of chips (third offence) Ah! Ah! You go to jail !
 
 Garamond  04 May 2008 20:28
 1 Comment
 
 u funny, Garamond. :-) ROFL
by  Scorpion
 05 Aug 2008 21:10
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
No. That's a dumb rule
 
 nick21  22 Apr 2008 18:04
 Add a Comment
 
 
I don't agree. Whilst I don't agree with violence, I think it is ridiculous to send someone to jail for hitting someone three times. What happens if both parties have been equally violent towards each other? Should they both be put away? There are far worse crimes out there.
 
 louise23  19 Mar 2008 22:35
 Add a Comment
 
 
Bug, So what you are saying is I could kill 2 people unpunished, but the third one I would go to jail. I am sure criminals would love that.
 
 -125_  19 Mar 2008 15:54
 Add a Comment
 
 
This is a ridiculous and abhorrent scheme .. It goes against any form of justice or reasonable manner of dealing with people who have made mistakes or criminal act as it takes no account of circumstances, reasoning or extenuating situations that may have occurred, it is reminiscent of draconian laws that would condemn people to life for stealing some bread ..

It doesn't actually tackle the issue or give any solution..

It goes against any common decency or civilised notion of what is fair or just .. And anyone that can advocate this as an option must surely be a brutal ignorant evil thug..

I'll be a no then ..
 
 Lawcom  18 Mar 2008 01:00
 Add a Comment
 
 
There are certain crimes that, if committed, are so heinous that removal from society is the only reasonable course of action in this society.
If someone honestly can't determine the consequences of their actions, then that person is also very dangerous to everyone around them.
 
 Moegreche  18 Mar 2008 00:53
 Add a Comment
 
 
You failed to specify to what extent your favored “law” applies. When concerning minor misdemeanors I would probably agree, but for the majority of crimes committed in today’s times, I will have to seriously disagree with your method.
 
 Hizashi  17 Mar 2008 22:30
 2 Comments
 
 But people need at less 2 times to see it and do something about it.
by  B_U_G_
 17 Mar 2008 22:49
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
A Hell Exist
If America Were To Host The Summer Olympics, There Would Be Protests
Critical-Thinking Is Only Half Of The Equation
Club Penguin Is The Best Website
If I Do Not Believe In Unicorns And Pixies, I Should Be Able To Prove It
This Site Should Consider Devil's Advocate Posts.
Hate Is Still Prevalent--- It MUST Be Dissolved
2 Stroke Rc Buggies Are Better Than Nitro Ones
Statistics Can Be Very Misleading.
Girls From Well Settled Family Are Working For Time Pass
New Debates
The Simpsons Is One Of The Best Cartoons Of All Time?
Energy Can Be Created And Destroyed
The Design Theory Is Flawed.
The Bible Was Written By Naive People.
Having A Boyfriend/girlfriend In High School Causes Lots Of Unnecessary Drama.
A Likely Reason Why Students Are Forced To Take Classes That They Don't Really Need For The Major They...
Sneezing When Looking At A Bright Light Is Caused By The Microbes In The Nose Reacting To The Light....
There Should Be Mild Sedatives In Prison Food.
Many Atheists Have Been Hurt By The Myths Of Santa, The Tooth Fairy And Easter Bunny. They Believed...
Fatties Should Take A Tip From Smokers. To Ward Off Those Cravings For Chips They Should Sellotape A...