» Home » Family
Gay Couples Should Not Be Able To Adopt Children
I disagree because a man and a women were created to have children not 2 men or 2 women that's going to end it up messing up our values and teaching them the idea that that's right. And I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING AGAINST THE GAY COMMUNITY!!!!!
 redrose  16 Feb 2008 03:42
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
I agree, until all forms of bullying are eradicated they should not be allowed to adopt. Both great religions in England are against this. And, I totally agree 100%.
 
 joe9  13 Jul 2008 22:18
 Add a Comment
 
 
Gay people have just the same amount of rights to adopt as any other person. If anything they should have more rights. They would probably love them more anyways. They can't just have a baby so they don't take children for granted. Does it really matter who the parents are as long as they love their children????
 
 OPINUATED1  12 May 2008 02:44
 1 Comment
 
 You posted on the wrong side! The topic is against them adopting. Green is you want them to not adopt, Red is you do.
by  FoxFire
 12 May 2008 11:52
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
They should be able to because the kids would be in an orphanage anyway and why can't they have children?
 
 lavatis  06 May 2008 21:07
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
I personally believe that its better for a gay couple to have a child of their own, then to have this prejudices against homosexuals.
 
 Andromeda  09 Apr 2008 23:06
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
Kids are going to be teased for anything and everything...they don't have the coolest clothes, there not playing the latest video games so that's not a very good argument at all and to ban somebody from having children because there either two men or two women is absurd. My girlfriend are going to make great mommies a heck of a lot better then the strung out straight 15 year old a lesbian will adopt from. Adoption should be judged household to household, i still think gay people should go through the same process as a straight couple though. But we certainly shouldn't be denied the right to a family cause we found love in the same sex.
 
 aisle10  08 Apr 2008 06:58
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
Yes because there are so many people in the world today who aren't fit to adopt or even have children i don't see a problem with letting a gay loving couple have a child when it would be better for the baby... Its the 21st century any way whats the big deal...
 
 DevilKat  27 Mar 2008 16:02
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
I don't have any attraction to the same sex but i think that they have a right to have kids. But there is a side I'm against it because the children has to go to school and get made fun of for having two moms or two dads. But two men and two women together can love and take care of there kids just as any other couple could.
 
 goldilocks  24 Mar 2008 04:02
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
I believe that they have every right to adopt, no matter what same sex couple they are. It doesn't mentally damage the child, most children nowadays grow up with parents who have split up, does it mess them up? Depending on the background sometimes it can as both parents are leading different lives, I would just like to point out i am not offending single parents I am just stating an opinion as single parents are able to manage children without a male/female partner so why cant gay couples do the same? There are homosexual couples out there who want nothing but to love and nurture a child, its not sick at all, and I fully encourage it.
 
 amyashuu  21 Feb 2008 21:30
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
Why not let to homosexuals who are capable of raising a child take responsibility over from the heterosexual catholic parents who lost there right to have children because there messed up in the head and taught the child that "if your not strait and christian your evil and will burn in hell" id much rather have to dads than a mental mother and extremist Christian father. (not that i have any problem with any belief or life style I'm just using an example i've experienced with a friend of mine that's all)
 
 muin13  21 Feb 2008 20:55
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
I am for this. I do not think the fact that the parents are gay has anything to do with the way they will raise a child. They will love a child the same that heterosexual couple would. Leaving a child without a home is ridiculous!!!
 
 angie1977  20 Feb 2008 01:18
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
Of course. Its another right that gay people should definitely be able to have. If you think about it, gay couples have to go through so much more in order to have children. Its really not an easy thing to do. Whether it is adoption, which then you have to deal with people wondering whether or not you are capable of providing a healthy environment for the child to live in or if its through a donor for gay women. You have to really want the child. Once you've finally gone through all the trouble that you know will be worth in the end, you know you're going to be ready to be an amazing parent. My point is that gay couples go through so much, they want it bad enough that they know they will not fail. Straight couples are amazing parents as well but there is that chance of a 'mistake' and that could lead to an unwanted child and a sad life ahead. Gay couples can be better than some straight couples for sure. Like said before, there are plenty of children looking for a home right now that would be more than happy to take a gay couple as their parents. Why not?
 
 jackie  19 Feb 2008 18:57
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
If same-sex couples are permitted to form civil unions and are now recognized by law in many countries, then there is no reason at all that they should not be permitted to adopt children. On a legal level, allowing them to marry, but prohibiting them from raising children makes absolutely no sense and is indefensible from a human rights perspective. If we are to confirm basic civil rights, then we must go all the way.

Gay couples can be just as responsible or irresponsible as straight parents when it comes to raising children. There is absolutely nothing that somehow makes them intrinsically less capable of caring for a child. The only problem that their children may run into, is that they may be teased or even bullied at school. Hopefully, however, this will subside in the coming years.
 
 mackenzie  18 Feb 2008 13:47
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
Sure why not, there's no reason they shouldn't be allowed to. There are tons of children who need good homes, why should they have to live in an orphanage. Gay couples are just as good as heterosexual couples, it all comes down to parenting.
 
 baconbust  16 Feb 2008 22:00
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
Adoption should be taken on a case by case basis, not determined by "gay or straight".
 
 fngrbng420  16 Feb 2008 17:45
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
Gay couples should be allowed to adopt children. You need to look at the bigger picture. Think about all the children that grow up in the system. Whatever the circumstances are that got them there, I'm sure they would be grateful to anyone that adopted them and gave them love and support as they grow up. The opposition states that this is bad because of the cruelty of other children at school. Kids are going to be cruel regardless of the home life. Think about all the kids that have parents in prison, have disabled parents, only one parent left alive...are you saying that it is more important not to have parents at all then to have gay parents? I think that is far more cruel than being subjected to some jokes at school. Furthermore, being gay is not a choice. It is something that you are born with and grow up living with the fear of how everyone else looks at you. Gay people do not need help, they need respect!
 
 Tweety511  16 Feb 2008 15:40
 1 Comment
 
 You posted on the wrong side. The topic is they shouldn't be allowed to adopt. Red is if you think they should be able to adopt, green is if you agree with the topic title.
by  FoxFire
 09 May 2008 20:38
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Absolutely. I know plenty of gay couples who would be much better parents than heterosexuals I see. Given a choice between a loving home with gay parents and no home at all, you'd have to be a fool to turn down gay adoption.
 
 Cephus  16 Feb 2008 09:06
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
Yes, everyone is equal, and should be able to adopt kids!
 
 cmonnot  16 Feb 2008 05:57
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
Yes because I think everyone has the right to adopted
 
 Gbeau12  16 Feb 2008 04:05
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
I disagree but have similar reasoning to yourself, gay couples shoul adopt children who can't have parents, and children should be adopted by people who can't have children. Then the world turns round.Ooh and some gay couples can make better parents than some straight ones.
 
 Hermione82  18 Sep 2008 21:56
 Add a Comment
 
 
As long as their loving why not?
 
 Lawyer  18 Aug 2008 16:22
 Add a Comment
 
 
As long as the child is loved a brought up in a stable environment then why not. A gay couple are equally as capable of giving a child everything it requires.
 
 kddan  31 Jul 2008 12:41
 Add a Comment
 
 
I think they should be allowed... People say they're going to be teased and picked on.. But if it wasn't the fact their parents are gay then it would only be something else. As long as the child is bought up in a stable and loving home and are shown the right ways of life then i don't think sexuality of the parents matter.
 
 Louisee--x  09 Jul 2008 20:51
 Add a Comment
 
 
LOL well, red rose, this poll shows how silly people are, everyone that seemed to vote green, voted against your ideas. LOL while most of the red voted with LOL
 
 Zman676  23 Jun 2008 15:53
 Add a Comment
 
 
Why does it matter what kind of person you are all that matters is that you take care of the child
 
 tay0921  11 Jun 2008 17:56
 Add a Comment
 
 
Iv a gay auntie who has 3 kids from her previous marriage
shes now in a civil partnership with another woman
shes raising those kids quite well
sexuality has nothing to do with it
so how would it matter if the kids were adopted?
Would the fact they were adopted somehow conflict with the sexuality?
 
 JackLC  23 May 2008 23:00
 Add a Comment
 
 
You say you have nothing against the gay community. What about your opinion, sounds like you are saying you are against them having a family....
 
 Bacchus  12 May 2008 02:48
 Add a Comment
 
 
WTF? Everyone's replying on the wrong side! People who think gay couple SHOULD be able to adopt, reply on this side! (The topic's shouldn't) People who think the SHOULDN'T be allowed to adopt, reply on the other!

Everyone should be able to adopt kids. Things and times are changing, people. Anyways, which would you prefer: The possibility of being teased everyday and having a loving family or being shipped from foster home to foster home, or living in an orphanage? It's not that difficult to choose...

You don't choose to be gay, or bi, or straight! Just as you don't choose to be born with an XX chromosome or an XY chromosome. It's completely (or mostly) random! We shouldn't punish people just because they're not straight.

I've also noticed that some people are arguing the whole tradition mother/ father figure role. That's a bunch of bs. There's masculine girls who could play the traditional father figure role easily, and feminine guys who could do the same for the traditional mother figure role. Even then, why do you need traditional roles like that?!? Does that mean single people shouldn't be allowed to adopt? Or that single parents should have their children taken away from them? You can't just say the mother/father argument without including them!

There's nothing wrong with being gay. There's nothing wrong with living with or marrying the same sex. Why should you say we shouldn't teach kids that? The worst that could happen as far as values for life is that they learn tolerance of people who are minorities. What's wrong with that?

Also, if a bi person or a gay person has a child in another marriage (straight) and they either divorce their spouse or their spouse/ boyfriend/ girlfriend dies or was never part of the picture, then are you going to argue that they shouldn't marry someone their own gender and keep the kid? Should they just give the kid up for adoption because they want to enter into a homosexual relationship? No, and you can't legally or sanely make them.

There's no point, no reason, and no sense in any of the arguments against gay people adopting. It should be allowed!

(the red side is for gay adoption, the green side is against, people!)
 
 FoxFire  09 May 2008 20:33
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
I honestly don't care if people are gay or not. Orphans are already tortured, raped, and beaten. Why put them thru more pain?? Their parents already left them and or died, they shouldn't have to undergo more pain. Its one thing to be gay but when you bring children into the matter its something else. Gay marriage isn't even legal in some states so why should we even consider letting them adopt?? If i was a child i wouldn't want to have to deal with all the kids at school picking on me and makingfun of me just because my "parents" are gay. Gay people are just now being accepted into our society and just now fitting in. Obviously they are having their own difficulties of their own and shouldn't be allowed to adopt children. Some people may ask well " does it really matter if they are in a home where they are loved?" My response to that is YES. Okay people that hit their children and abuse them love their children. Right? So should they be able to keep abusing their children? NO. A lot of people love children and are still unfit parents, including gay people.
 
 partygirl  09 May 2008 20:19
 1 Comment
 
 Just now being accepted into our society? LOL
That is completely false, gays have always been in our society, and it was for some odd reason many hundreds of years ago Paul and a couple other people said some things they might regret. So many cultures through the human kinds entire existence have had gay men and woman. Some gay men and woman were even idolized. Not to mention gay rights have been being fought over since the 60’s… The funny thing is that we still cannot find complete acceptation or equality in society.

“Obviously they are having their own difficulties of their own and shouldn't be allowed to adopt children”
Only difficulties we have are against the bigots and discriminators in this country.
Either way you look at it though this doesn’t affect why or why not we should be allowed to adopt. Not to mention most gay men and woman are very wealthy, or at least middle class. You do not see the majority of the gay population on the streets or in poor communities. I say gay people are perfect for adopting, not only because they are generally wealthy but they also have huge amounts of love to give that normally the average hetero wouldn’t.
by  Zman676
 23 Jun 2008 16:09
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Why not?
 
 kitten  09 May 2008 19:27
 Add a Comment
 
 
Gay couples should not be able to adopt children. I know that sounds awful, but I don't think raising a child in that kind of environment is in their best interest. You don't want a child to think that this kind of relationship is OK. I mean, power to the people that are in these relationships, but if that is what you choose, you just shouldn't be allowed to adopt. It is their decision to be together and I think if that is their decision , it should automatically mean no kids. It really isn't healthy for children. Can you picture when that poor child goes to school? They will never, ever live it down that they have gay parents. You cannot hide something like that. The only reason Rosie can pull it off is because she has a ton of money. Only a woman and a man family should have children.
 
 curious  30 Apr 2008 02:05
 2 Comments
 
 OMG it is not a decision, just like everyone else we don’t decide to be attracted to the same sex. Goodness…
Seriously, what is wrong with a homosexual relationship?
This comment makes no sense to me
by  Zman676
 23 Jun 2008 16:12
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
This is definitely not true. Redrose, I don't believe anybody should prevent people from knowing their options. It's a perfectly valid lifestyle and I think people mean to be on the opposite sides. The people that are for gay adoption should be on this side...and the people who are against it should be on the other...right?

Anywho, there are thousands of unwanted children in our orphanages and I see no problem with a gay couple adopting one. You're going to punish them for their sexual orientation by denying them what greater joy than a child? It's the one thing they can't get on their own and so I don't see how anyone could be so prejudiced as to deny them that because they don't agree with their choices. I do have a problem with your words, 'natural couple', sudipa. Homosexuals are just as natural as anyone else.

But honestly, everyone has the right to adopt and be adopted.
 
 veggiefry  28 Apr 2008 02:20
 Add a Comment
 
 
In my opinion, gay couples should definitely be allowed to adopt children. In the orphanages, there are countless children even today, who are deprived of parental love and care. So, if a gay couple thinks of adopting a child, I think that there is no harm in it. When a child is adopted, proper care should be taken so that he/she is provided with an environment, conducive to his/her growth. As long as the child lives a healthy life and grows normally, issue like whether he/she has been adopted by a natural couple or a gay couple or even a single parent, should not be a matter of concern. Moreover, if our society does not permit gay couples to adopt children, then I feel that it is the result of cramped mentality of man who has lost his kindness and humanity, with the progress of science.
 
 sudipa  17 Apr 2008 15:12
 Add a Comment
 
 
The bible says that marriage is for one man and one woman only. Why encourage something that is entirely wrong?
 
 im_trumpet  09 Apr 2008 20:20
 1 Comment
 
 The Bible is a book of ancient mythology and we live in a modern secular society. You're free to believe that it's wrong, but you have no right to force those beliefs on anyone else.
by  Cephus
 09 Apr 2008 20:29
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
A child needs a balanced environment and comprehensive life style to become a useful member of the society, without prejudices and insecurities. He needs to have a complete outlook from the outset; the protection of a father and the selfless love of a mother, both combine to form a home. In an environment where he is deprived of a mother’s sweet love or a father’s iron control, the child will not thrive.
 
 Zunera  20 Mar 2008 16:25
 1 Comment
 
 So single parents shouldn't be allowed to adopt or raise children? Even if they gave birth to or fathered that child themselves, or they have had the child for years and either got a divorce or their spouse died? Because then the child doesn't have a mother and a father at home.

You're also assuming traditional gender roles. Mother can be protective and provide iron control. Father's can give love just as well as mothers can.
by  FoxFire
 09 May 2008 20:40
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I do not think that gay people should be allowed to adopt children. Although they may be great parents, having gay parents would open the child up for a life of jokes, pranks and hurtful remarks from their friends. They would be bullied and picked on all through their educational years. Kids today do not understand what "gay" means and if another student does not have the traditional mommy and daddy, they will be an oddball in their class. It is not fair for the child. Why should the child be forced to explain their parent's sexual orientation all of their lives? Homosexuality is against the teaching of the Bible and should be illegal in public. It is a choice, not a lifestyle. Gay people are sick and need help, just like a drug addict. They should definitely not be allowed to be around children.
 
 Flash  16 Feb 2008 14:56
 5 Comments
 
 It IS a choice, true. But it could be a lifestyle.
by  Stranger
 18 Feb 2008 21:24
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Casey Anthony, Mother Of Missing Child, Will Eventually Crack And Spill The Beans About The Actual Events...
Kids/babies Not In Seat Belt Or Car Seat= Abuse
Family Is Important
The Mobil Phone Is Good For Children
People Should Not Choose Abortion Over Adoption
Kids Should Wear Helmets When Riding A Bicycle
Life Is Way Better If You Have Someone To Share It With
Us Christians ShouldCelebrate Halloween
It Is OK To Keep Your Abortion A Secret If The Guy You Are Dating Has Trouble In His Life.
Women Are Required To Have More Accountability Toward Pedestrians And Passengers In Their Cars Than They...
New Debates
People Who Haven't Watched The Movie, Read The Book, Or Heard The Song Shouldn't Criticize The Movie,...
Government Healthcare Good Or Bad
Is Hydrogen Poroxide A Good Ingredien For Experiments Like Elephant Toothpaste.
MacDonalds Should Be Banned
Porche 911 Turbo Is A Noticable Car On The Streets.
If You Meet An Alien It Will Suck Out Your Brains.
Chicken Is Nice
That My Brother Doesn't Have A Dick
That Modern Technology Is A Plague On Human Relationships
Technology Is Tearing Us A Criminal