|
Yes.
I am loathe to agree with this debate, like a few other ones I have posted to which go against my
grain completely, but.....
I reluctantly, agree.
Socialization, if you expect a kid to deal with others in a city later on in his life, put them in
more social environs some.
I was raised the first formative 12 years of my life in the wilderness up in the mountains away from
humans and interaction. This was a wonderful life - for me - until my folks moved me into town at
age 12.
I hated it.
Still do, I live in a city ever since. I hate the city.
But, learning how to talk to people and deal with people is something a kid needs to have young:
Wait too long, and they will have a difficult time later on trying to figure out how humans behave
and operate and how to deal with people.
City-life is this whole nuther country;-).......;-) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I think it should be complusary. It helps students to become more social, helps students find their
stregnths and weaknesses, and it can help them practice skills they may need later on it life. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Wouldn't it then, by definition, add them into the curriculum, since the 'extra-curricular' aspect
would be removed? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Extra-curricular activities are beneficial, but they shouldnt be mandatory. You shouldnt force
people to be social or discover their strengths and weaknesses.
I don't even think school should be mandatory, let alone extra-curricular activities. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
06 Oct 2008 00:38
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
