» Home » Education
Should Computers Replace Teachers?
With as much technology that is available today, students learn better from a computer than from a teacher. Do you believe this to be true?
 Professor  10 Feb 2008 12:14
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
Yes because then we wouldn't have to pay teachers.
 
 ur_wrong  28 Jun 2008 23:55
 Add a Comment
 
 
Du they should because there smarter lol
 
 yello  15 Feb 2008 22:10
 2 Comments
 
 Um, no, The Computer is only as smart as the person on the other side. The Computer does not program itself. people do :O
by  SunSparkle
 22 Feb 2008 06:03
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I personally have received a lot of free classes at free-ed.com, including classes that I have yet to take. I am a Sophomore in high school, taking enriched geometry, but I already have a thorough understanding of the basic in trigonometry. I also take classes that I am currently in, and I have found that in every class, I learn as much, if not more, that what my teachers teach.
 
 zakk  11 Feb 2008 16:46
 Add a Comment
 
 
Many aspects of our educational system are outmoded. For example, the practice of giving lectures at university is really a relic of the Middle Ages when the technology of printing had not yet been invented. There is rarely any real need for lectures nowadays except when the lecturer is presenting material so distinctive that it does not exist anywhere in book form. For 95% of lectures given in the higher education system today, written material, accessed either in printed form or online, would be preferable.

It would be better if students were responsible for their own education through personal study in online texts. There should be a teacher available to offer advice if needed but the fact that all education is given in a collective classroom context simply holds back the more able students and brings them down to the level of the lowest common denominator.
 
 Hidell  10 Feb 2008 13:52
 Add a Comment
 
NO!!! Believe it or not, there actually are a lot of us young people who learn much better with an actual person teaching us and answering our questions and tailoring the lessons to a specific class's needs. I find it very hard to learn from a computer. Even just printing stuff out helps. Computers are NOT the ideal method of learning for a lot of people.
 
 sherbert  23 Oct 2008 04:45
 Add a Comment
 
 
Computers aren't yet able to adjust to a students learning style.
 
 Specter87  29 Aug 2008 01:58
 Add a Comment
 
 
No way they would jump around and throw things at the computer. Plus how would it pass out any thing it would tell kids to pass it out and then they would throw it away. There would be a lot of cheating and cheting.The kids would love it.
 
 Amber2015  31 Jul 2008 18:44
 Add a Comment
 
 
Teachers are very helpful to students because when a student has a question, they can go ask their teacher.
 
 ice_cold  05 Jun 2008 22:11
 Add a Comment
 
 
Do you realize how much more cheating would go on in this world if we didn't have teachers to catch us? With Internet programs you could get your mom to take the test for you and the computer would never even know...unlike a teacher would notice that your mom is in class and not you.
 
 LME  05 Jun 2008 21:54
 Add a Comment
 
 
When computers are capable of giving feedback on errors, of inspirational and improvisational thought, and of disciplining students to keep them focused on the task, then they will replace teachers.
 
 K9  05 Jun 2008 21:26
 Add a Comment
 
 
No, I don't think computers should replace teachers. Children need the one on one learning that teachers provide. I don't think children would learn as much just using a computer. I think having reports where you stand up in front of the class and present them is a vital part of school. Children also need the interaction with other children. It is a part of growing to be a social being. I would never recommend taking this route in teaching kids and if it ever came about that that is the way teaching would start happening, I would home school my children.
 
 curious  29 Apr 2008 13:50
 Add a Comment
 
 
No, who wants some machine speaking monotone for 70 minutes?
 
 im_trumpet  15 Apr 2008 20:18
 Add a Comment
 
 
No, absolutely not. As a student I'm saying it's a terrible idea. Teachers are able to asses students based on a relationship a computer would never be able to build. Teacher also teach valuable mannerisms. Plus with computers there is such a thing called information overload which i can't imagine being good for a student...or how about this, next time you have a problem with an assignment, ask your computer. If it does answer you, see if you don't take the fallowing hour trying to analyze the information so you can use it .
 
 JmanBroski  21 Feb 2008 05:50
 Add a Comment
 
 
One thing about the student-teacher relationship that plays a very important role in ensuring maximum learning is the human connection or bond. A teacher does not only provide education he is a friend and a confidant in so many cases. A good teacher attends to the needs of a student according to his mood and personal needs etc. For example often young children are given more time to grasp a concept and do certain work simply because they are dealing with a family situation at home like a divorce maybe. A computer can never cater to these human needs.
 
 Twilight  11 Feb 2008 15:08
 1 Comment
 
 You know, friends are actually the child's best confidants, and distract them by having fun, not by working.
by  zakk
 11 Feb 2008 20:13
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
There are a great many things that only a person can teach. At present computers lack the know how to adapt to a students needs. Good teachers are able to alter their teaching style to make sure that the lessons are sinking in.

While I am all for textbooks on CD or online, computers are no substitute for real live teachers.
 
 Cliffo  11 Feb 2008 11:15
 1 Comment
 
 This is why teachers would be on the site to answer questions.
by  zakk
 11 Feb 2008 20:13
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
There are just things that a person can only teach.
 
 pappabear  10 Feb 2008 23:54
 Add a Comment
 
 
That's ridiculous, no matter how advanced computers have gotten in recent years, they cannot compete with the abilities that a human teacher has. They cannot adjust strategies or teaching styles to deal with different situations and students, they cannot have compassion or interest or any other emotion toward a student.

Computers are great in their place, but they do not have universal application.
 
 Cephus  10 Feb 2008 20:50
 Add a Comment
 
 
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!! Talk about a bad economy... Another huge loss in jobs. Teachers are just as important, as nurses, firemen, and police.
 
 baconbust  10 Feb 2008 16:50
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
Although technology is a wonderful teaching tool, I do not believe that a computer could ever replace a teacher. I believe that teachers should be better trained to use the technology in the classroom. Computers do not have that human element that students need to learn. Computers do not care about the student's personal problems or learning disabilities. Teachers are needed to help and guide students. They nurture the student and offer praise. Therefore, I do believe that technology is a great tool in the classroom; it will never replace a real teacher. Teachers and technology together are the best way to teach today's students.
 
 Professor  10 Feb 2008 12:18
 1 Comment
 
 The technology would be very hard to get with only a school budget.
by  zakk
 11 Feb 2008 20:14
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Students Should Be Able To Take More Non-core Classes.
Freshman Are Annoying!
Email And Text, During Lunch, In School Should Be Allowed.
A Women's Beauty Should Not Be Judged By The Color Of Her Skin...
No Child Left Behind Act.
Girls/boys Should Learn Together In Their Schools.
The Greater The Essence Of The Mind, The Greater The Knowledge Of God.
Full Day Kindergarten Might Not Work Out
Water Is Life
The Teaching Of A Modern Foreign Language Should Remain Compulsory In Schools.
New Debates
Dogs Are Great Lovable Pets. Energetic,lively But Cats Are For The Quit Types Of People Sly,mysterious...
By Firing Rockets Into Israel, The Palestinians, However Misguided, Are Just Living Up To The Same Human...
Many People Would Actually Fight For Their Country If They Had The Chance
We Can't Actually Feel Pain
Weapons Of Mass Destruction Should Be Outlawed
One Of The Best Things You Can Do For Yourself And Loved Ones Is To Set Goals For The Coming Year. Studies...
Apocalypse, 2012, IMMINENT
Life Isn't About What Happens To You It's How "you Choose To React To What Happens.
Life's Worst Experiences Can Teach You The Most About Life.
World Government Is Inevitable.