» Home » Family
Same Sex Couples Do Not Make Good Child Rearers
I think to be a good parent, you need to be part of an ordinary one man and one woman couple, because children need role models.
 Spartan76  30 Dec 2007 23:15
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
A child needs a male for a fatherly role model and a female for a motherly role model.
 
 Good1212  02 Nov 2008 16:29
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree. A child will need a male role model and a female role model to grow up and follow because they can learn different life skills from both. Also mums and dads have different raising methods and the child can learn from each also the kid might get picked on
 
 mutani  15 Oct 2008 19:37
 3 Comments
 
 So what if the kid gets picked on? It just shows how immature the other kids are. That kid will still be able to go out and have friends and everything.
by  AxemRanger
 16 Oct 2008 17:22
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I think they can be respectful and helpful to a child, but the ideal situation is with a mother and a father.
 
 created  07 Sep 2008 14:34
 Add a Comment
 
 
Adding that this child might grow up and have sexual problem and become a gay or a lesbian
 
 child  15 Aug 2008 09:34
 1 Comment
 
 Or maybe the child will understand their "situation" and respect it. Maybe the child will be able to have a mind of its own, perhaps?
by  AxemRanger
 15 Oct 2008 19:08
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I do not have enough information on this to give a definitive.
I do not know.

However, in lieu of information, I will go with the mores of proper man/woman home. Sounds reasonable at this time, and is in consistency with what I am myself: Heterosexual person.
 
 Scorpion  18 Jul 2008 01:07
 Add a Comment
 
 
Researchers such as Lyle Pruett of Yale and Carol Gilligan of Harvard have documented thoroughly (confirming ordinary common observation and experience) that mothers and fathers love differently, although in complementary ways. Kids need the roughhousing and emphasis on justice of their fathers as well as the tenderness of their mothers, and it's the lack of fathers nowadays that is the single greatest social problem because it correlates the most closely with all the other social problems as a causative factor.
 
 johnb  30 Apr 2008 15:35
 2 Comments
 
 dude, many women can be complete beotches, you know. (nowadays women are actually more likely to hit their spouse/ kids, kill their spouse/ kids, etc.) And many men can be tender. Woman can emphasize justice.

It's entirely an individual thing. Yes, there are tendencies. Women tend to be more willing to show emotion (though that's actually a cultural thing) and tend to be more sympathetic and empathetic, while men tend to be more physically agressive and more obvious about being concerned with pride (women are also way concerned with pride, but they don't tend to go screaming it to the world).

There are many kids raised by one parent, or by gay parents, who have turned out way better than kids raised by a heterosexual couple.
by  FoxFire
 23 May 2008 21:40
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I agree
 
 vgking13  02 Mar 2008 02:58
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree with that. Children are susceptible to kid`s`jokes and they can also suffer from this. Although a child should have a mother and a father that is the law of God why can`t people respect that?
 
 redrose  19 Feb 2008 19:36
 1 Comment
 
 Well for one thing Red rose, not everyone believes in God. Not to mention there are cultures that are ok with same sex unions and child baring. So basically all the homophobes and bigots are going to have to deal with a little more individualism…
by  Zman676
 23 Jun 2008 15:16
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Father and Mother is what God made and intended, not mom and mom or dad and dad. It is completely unnatural for two of the same sex to be together married, let alone raising a child. It is just one way our family is being destroyed today by satan himself. It is wrong whether you want to hear it or not.
 
 morallaw  01 Feb 2008 20:27
 1 Comment
 
 Let's go ahead and assume there is no God. What's wrong with it now?
by  mou
 02 Mar 2008 23:59
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
It has been going on since centuries that in order to ensure a good upbringing of a child a father and mother’s love, affection, guidance and many other things are required. Previously it was not there that in a couple both of them are from the same sex rather this was considered to an absurd matter even 15-20 years back also. But now it has been proven medically that two individuals belonging to the same sex can get attracted to each other and this can happen equally in cases for both two males and two females. In both the cases conceiving a baby is not possible but in case of upbringing here comes a problem because that becomes a not so easy task. For a child it becomes confusing to understand as to whom to place in what position and this creates a very strange impact on their mind.
 
 sudipa  30 Jan 2008 19:06
 1 Comment
 
 I find this remarkable how you know how the child would react... Gays and Lesbians have only been allowed to adopt children over the past few years. They also have not been prominent in birthing children over the past few years. There are no accurate studies done yet, for exactly how these children have turned out, because they aren't old enough.

And by going on having a mother and a father... why don't you research the latest data on divorce rates and fathers that leave their children. You'd be surprised.
by  seoems369
 01 Feb 2008 20:35
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
It is my belief that same sex couples may be good people, they may be nice people, they may be excellent examples of the human species but they are unable to offer a child what they need in terms of gender role models. The absence of the male or female role model creates a knowledge and experience vacuum for the child, they do not have the positive and reinforcing experiences of both genders to go on.

A growing child needs to understand how men and women are supposed to behave. If two men or two women bring them up, something is missing from their childhood development. They need to be around people who teach them how their own gender behaves. I believe that the absence will impede their natural development and understanding.

Same sex couples also bring up children who are just perfect targets for bullying. What could be more of a target than a child with no mum and two dads. Does it not also promote homosexuality as a norm, when it is obvious that it is not a social norm, but a perversion from the normal sexuality? By perversion, I do not use the word as an insult, but as an indicator of the tangent that it makes from the accepted social norms. A child needs to understand that whilst there is nothing wrong with homosexuality that it is not the norm and that heterosexuality is the accepted social norm.

I believe that it is possible for same sex couples to bring up children, but I do not think that they make great role models for their children. If they spent more time around straight men and women it would be better for them. Rearing children is difficult and if they make a better job of it than a straight couple fair enough, I just think that if it’s possible, they should only bring up children in an environment with access to male and female role models.
 
 Spartan76  30 Dec 2007 23:29
 5 Comments
 
 Completely in agreement with you. A child needs both a mother and and a father to provide certain, specific needs. for a boy, he needs a father to show him strength and fortitude(which all but lost in many of today's men), and also how he may come into being a man himself; he also needs a mother to be one of support and nurture, lest he become a brute. For girls, they need a father to show how they ought to be treated by men and how they should be sought after and valued; they also need a mother to show them the way to become a woman and characterize the beauty and subtle strength that they should offer in return for the strength offered by a man.
by  davidsuggs
 03 Jan 2008 15:59
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Why? No difference.
 
 leanza  17 Mar 2010 00:25
 Add a Comment
 
 
So what if people like the same sex who cares. Just becuase some familys in the worlds the kids have two dads or two moms doesnt mean they dont have good role models. Enyone could be good role models even if theres just one person taking care of the kid. I believe its all in the raising if u let your child get away with alot of stuff and let them run free sure there going to be bad kids and maybe not but if you set a few rules and dont let ur child go wild then ur fine your fine u dont have to have a mom and a dad to be a good role model. You just have to teach your child right from wrong.
 
 kenzie121  22 Jan 2010 01:35
 Add a Comment
 
 
Like I tell my children if we were all the same this place we live would be a rather boring.

Homosexuals should be able to have children. They are homosexuals not child molesters.
 
 jaykaywy  04 Mar 2009 04:14
 Add a Comment
 
 
Gays don't take turns feeding each others butts. One operates as the "pitcher" (the man) and the other is the "catcher" (the female, if you will). In lesbian relationships, one is rather butch (the male) and the other is less butch (the womanly one). These are same-gender roles that don't change over time. To say that there needs to be role models for the child to understand is to say that same sex couples are just as capable of child rearing as hetero parents.
It seems to me that all a stable and happy home requires is LOVE. Any family that can provide a happy and loving environment for the children is a much better situation than MOST kids get.

A same sex couple that decides to adopt children has thought and planned about having kids more than any hillbilly doin' it with their cousin. That's just common sense. Also, gay is programmed into the person's genes. The child isn't going to be "infected" with gay. They just won't be as scared of gays as the average American.
 
 vitiate  25 Feb 2009 05:41
 Add a Comment
 
 
So... To be a good parent you need to be an "ordinary" family with one man and one woman. I guess as a single mom I'm a pretty crappy mom then, huh? I'm a bad role model because I chose to raise my daughter alone when her father got addicted to drugs?

All a child needs to be raised well is a safe place to live, food in their bellies, clothes on their backs, and someone to love them. They don't need a mom *and* a dad to turn out "normal". Just a mom, just a dad, 2 moms, or 2 dads are just as good as raising a happy family as a mom and a dad together are.
 
 lolkat  15 Feb 2009 09:03
 Add a Comment
 
 
I think this makes the children more accepting of the changes in our society.
 
 mordsith  17 Dec 2008 01:05
 Add a Comment
 
 
Most traditional parents nowdays are lousy at raising kids. All you have to do is look around to see that.
 
 TullFan  08 Dec 2008 06:25
 Add a Comment
 
 
I would disagree with this statement because one can then assume that if a child isn't raised by a father and a mother, that single parents cannot raise their children correctly either. If you agree that a single parent can raise a child just as well, then you can agree that two men or two women can raise a child just fine. If one is worried about the child turning gay because of the same sex couples, tell me...what is so wrong with a child being gay?
 
 Damien  15 Oct 2008 19:18
 3 Comments
 
 Absolutely nothing.
by  AxemRanger
 16 Oct 2008 01:02
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Just as many situations can go wrong with a gay/lesbian couple raising a child as can go wrong with a heterosexual couple. If the mother and father are lousy parents, then you're screwed. Gays/lesbians would only have kids if they both agreed on having kids, however they intended. Don't you think that this way the gay/lesbians' children would be better watched out for than having a mom and dad who neglected their children?
 
 AxemRanger  15 Oct 2008 19:06
 Add a Comment
 
 
Who says gays don't make good child rearers, if the child is loved and has to stable parents, whether it be of the same sex or opposite where is the problem.
I can expect a response like, a child need a mother and father in its life to develop fully. Well no because single parent families can get on just fine and the kids can be become brilliant in later life. As for places where gays can adopt they seem to be doing a good job, its when bigots start interfering that there is a problem.
Secondly, another response will probably be "oh my god, gays raising a kid, the kids going to be gay or something." Because of course all straight couples raise straight children don't they, note the sarcasm.
Gays can raise kids just as well as straight people.
 
 kddan  09 Oct 2008 15:05
 Add a Comment
 
 
They are just as good as any-one else! And they have as much rights as anyone else too!
 
 Monique  28 Sep 2008 16:22
 Add a Comment
 
 
It this a pun? "rearing"? Rofl if it is
 
 eelmonkey  20 Aug 2008 18:46
 1 Comment
 
 Don't be immature about this. This is a serious issue.
by  AxemRanger
 15 Oct 2008 19:10
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I totally disagree with you, same sex couples can have pretty much the same influence on a child's growing up as a usual man and woman couple, there are many single parents that would have the same influence right? Its just one more same sex person to help
 
 jezhicka  15 Jul 2008 08:31
 Add a Comment
 
 
I don't think that sex has anything thing with bringing up kids.....its the love they give them and the things they can provide for them....there are so many kids in faster care and up for adoption...if there is someone out there to love them why not?
 
 greeneyez  10 Jul 2008 18:03
 Add a Comment
 
 
I can not go for this, because it is just ignorant to say such things... Any one can skew statistical info to prove a fact these days... But no one can just create love out of the bloom.
 
 Zman676  20 Jun 2008 08:26
 Add a Comment
 
 
And what exactly would prevent a gay person from potentially being a good role model? Integrity, ethics and love are what really matters in a parent. If they have those qualities then they will do the best job they can.
 
 finsch  12 Jun 2008 01:23
 Add a Comment
 
 
There have been numerous cases of mixed sex parenting that has gone terribly wrong involving abuse and neglect. What kind of role models do these parents make? Don't get me wrong, there are also many mixed sex couples (mine included) that are able to bring up their children as respectful, intelligent and well-rounded human beings. Due to the difficulty for a same-sex couple to have/adopt a child, the chances are that they have made the decision after a great deal of thought and discussion and is certainly not something that they have entered into lightly, unlike many mixed-sex couples nowadays, for example, teen pregnancies. I think that to say that same-sex couples do not makes good 'child-rearers' is incredibly narrow-minded and does not take into account the many richly diverse cultural factors that affect children today. I also would imagine that a child who has been raised by a loving and caring same-sex couple would grow to be a far more intelligent and accepting human being than you are.
 
 Lemony  12 Jun 2008 01:06
 Add a Comment
 
 
A lot of the arguments I hear for this seem to assume that women shouldn't have jobs and should do all the household chores and should stay at home. They also seem to assume that men have to be macho and hide their emotions, and that men have to act a certain way.

Get over yourselves, people. It's already been proven that traditional gender roles aren't absolute, and that child rearing is based more on individual qualities than on gender.

Yes, the kids are teased. They're also teased for having bad eyesight, for liking different things, for being individual instead of conforming, for not being extremely social, just because, etc. Kids will be mean. Having gay parents is just one excuse of millions to bully someone.

And why in all the hells is a lower birth rate a problem?!?!?! The world could use a lower birth rate! We're overpopulated as it is!

There are problems within all relationships. Parents fighting. Parents divorcing. Parent(s) never having been there in the first place. Children being neglected. This happens in heterosexual relationships, too, you know.

One thing: Being taught to bottle up emotions until you snap and kill someone (as seems to be the norm for teaching men) isn't very good. Everyone of both genders needs to be taught it's okay to cry every now and then. It's okay to show your emotions. It's also okay to stand up for yourself, and to carve out your own identity.

Plus, same sex couples adopt children that would otherwise be living on the streets, in orphanages, or being rotated through foster homes. How can a loving household, no matter the sexuality of the parents, be any worse than that? Is it better to have no role models than to have role models from only one gender? I'd think not.

And by your argument we shouldn't allow single parents to raise kids either, huh? Should a woman have her kids taken away from her just because the father up and vanished? The kids would be raised with only one gender as a role model then, after all. Should fathers who's wives die or leave have their children taken away? If parents divorce, and one finds a partner almost instantly, even if the original parent was never a good parent and their spouse hates kids, should the children be given into the care of the parent that left their other parent for someone else? Even if neither would likely give them the love they need?

Please don't go arguing that homosexuality is wrong... If you want an argument on that, please check out one of the other debates. I'm too tired to argue the whole thing right now.

And please reply with something other than religion to back up your opinion.

Any other arguments?
 
 FoxFire  23 May 2008 21:55
 Add a Comment
 
 
That's far too much of a generalization. I've seen gay couples who are fantastic parents and hetero couples who can't parent for beans. You can't judge like that. And about role models...it's not like the kid lives in a bubble. I mean, they get out and see other people that can and will eventually become role models for them.
 
 veggiefry  28 Apr 2008 02:39
 Add a Comment
 
 
They make as good child rearers as heterosexual couples. Since both genders can love I don't see why they wouldn't be.
 
 Shizenk  12 Apr 2008 20:32
 Add a Comment
 
 
What a load... Yes a child with same sex parents could be open to a lot more teasing from there peers but at the same time could be brought up to be by far more open-minded to the differences in people around them thus teaching others about acceptance. I do not see anything wrong with 2 people of the same gender raising a child, I do not see how they would not make good role models. You cannot base a persons morals/scruples based on there sex life. I honestly would prefer to see a couple of the same sex raising a child in a loving environment rather than seeing a child being neglected or in a system. How is 2 same sex parents any worse than single parent homes? All present different challenges and all are just as honourable. It is to be perfectly honest people that agree with this that are teaching there children its ok to hate and make fun of those who are different. So please explain to me how your any better?
 
 Untoldrose  11 Apr 2008 08:51
 Add a Comment
 
 
There are many families with single moms or dads yet the children come out completely functional. Let us look at criminals many of whom had a mom and dad at home yet look at them. Even if both parents are the same sex their are other ways for the child to get a role model of the same sex. For instance if it's two men and the child is a girl their are female family members and or friends.
 
 Alex18  07 Apr 2008 05:58
 Add a Comment
 
 
This is not true, study shows that same sex couples actually had more success raising a child.
 
 nelson12  14 Mar 2008 00:21
 Add a Comment
 
 
Why? Gay couples must adopt, which simply puts another child in a well-needed home. Lesbian couples have the option to be artificially inseminated or adopt, which is just fine. Why would it make a bad home? Are you afraid it would encourage homosexuality in the child?
A) There's really nothing wrong with that.
B) Homosexuality is something you're born with, not made into.
 
 mou  02 Mar 2008 23:58
 Add a Comment
 
 
From what I've witnessed - neither do heterosexual couples.
 
 Damian  01 Mar 2008 02:23
 Add a Comment
 
 
This is ridiculous because a child brought up in love whether two men two women or a man and a woman does not matter and is way better than today. So we turn away from people who love our children and putting them in the hands of drug dealing fathers strung out mothers rapists uncles and emotionally scarring aunts as well as the harsh reality of the system where they think no one loves them???
 
 ambercol  01 Mar 2008 02:19
 Add a Comment
 
 
This is ridiculous just because somebody is a man or a woman doesn't effect how good of a parent they are
 
 SIKLEMIND3  20 Feb 2008 02:44
 Add a Comment
 
 
Whatever your belief about "what nature intended", it simply cannot be said that same sex couples can under NO circumstances ever bring children up well. There will be instances where certain same sex couples will bring more love and care to their children than couples consisting of a man and a woman, so I believe such a statement, even made as general one, is false.
 
 jsh4  14 Feb 2008 23:40
 Add a Comment
 
 
Research underway and completed today shows that same-gender families are in fact more healthy for children when compared with the same number and percentage of opposite-gender families.
IN SAME-GENDER HOMES:
Children are more nurtured by BOTH parents who share equally in the time and quality of time with their children. (How many heterosexual homes are there where the working father spends an average of 15 minutes a day with his children; and where both parents work, how long: Not much.

Children in homosexual families are taught positive values and morals of society that lead to healthy adults who are making positive decisions and actions in all aspects of their lives.

Children in homosexual families do not become homosexuals any more often as children in heterosexual families (17% of population is gay, therefore as many as 17% of families have a gay child who may or may not choose to 'come out.'

Children homosexual families know that their parents care for and about each other because they are more affectionate with each other and toward their children. Whereas, "the honeymoon is over' early in the marriage of heterosexuals who seldom show affection to each other by the time their kids start school.

Divorce in a homosexual family occurs less often than divorce in heterosexual families.

There's more to come in research that shows that homosexual families are healthier than heterosexual families. The old idea that a child needs to be raised by both a mother and a father has lost it's accuracy since long ago when single divorced mothers have raised their kids without fathers visiting or caring or paying financial support. (I did that and my 4 yr old, now 36, seldom saw her father at his choice and now doesn't care to...he has not seen, called nor written for 11 years).
 
 best4write  14 Feb 2008 23:30
 Add a Comment
 
 
I don't agree because I am a parent. I guess all single mothers and fathers have a problem raising normal kids too, and let's not forget widows, or men who have lost their wives. That is a very narrow minded way to think, In my opinion you should broaden your perspective, and spend some time with children of these families, and dedide then for yourself.
 
 Divinity  30 Jan 2008 02:35
 1 Comment
 
 It is completely impossible for the self professed Holy rollers to look at a different perspective. They are unable to do so, don't want to because of fear, and are baised solely on what they interpret the Bible to say. It's funny that no one has any other argument against gays, outside of a Biblical excuse.
by  seoems369
 01 Feb 2008 20:40
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I understand this is still a relatively new social practice, at least for the public to see more and more 'out' gay and lesbians. I agree that it is too early to tell what these children will grow up to be like... But without giving the gay and lesbians a chance, how are we as humans, supposed to grow and learn? I think banning them because it's not the middle class white man woman relationship would be like banning single women and men from raising children, or banning interracial couples. Human life is about dignity, and every time we tell someone they can't participate in something everyone else is doing, is lowering that dignity. It's just about fear- people are fearful of being out of 'their' norm.
 
 seoems369  29 Jan 2008 17:20
 Add a Comment
 
 
There are many same sex relationships which would provide a loving home for children.
I think it would be better for a child in care to be with two people who would provide love, stability and security in their young life.
As in any relationship ,there's always the risk that a couple will separate and the child always suffers under these circumstances.
Our ideas of the perfect family don't often match reality. Not all fathers are good role models, or do they all treat women well. Not all career women are bad mothers, not all stay at home mothers cope well. Each situation is different.
In the past it was often the 'norm' for children to be brought up in female dominated households due to warfare and high death rates of both men and women. Same sex situations are not new. It's the relationships within them that are different now.
Until a high proportion of same-sex couples have reared children for a longer period we will not have a real idea of the implications of these family units. Once the children themselves grow up and give their own voice to this debate we can make more informed statements on it.
 
 Researcher  09 Jan 2008 08:05
 Add a Comment
 
 
A child needs parents of both sex to progress normally in life. The situation has become even worse with the recent cases of same sex partnerships breaking down with the leaving party not realising their responsibilities towards the children in their care forcing the burden onto the sperm donor or the state.
 
 Lishman  04 Jan 2008 13:08
 Add a Comment
 
 
I mean no offense, but the 'social norm' may be considered heterosexuality, but what is normal? In this case, I would think it would be that there are more heterosexual couples. I would suggest we all do some research..on gay couples vs. Normal couples on child rearing, and see how they turned out. Then we would have stats, instead of just ideas. Being able to have a child is something that should be denied to no one who is fit to raise and rear them, in my opinion. Look at single mothers/fathers. While they may lack the influence of the opposite gender on their children (if the father/mother was gone, for what ever reason, while the child was at an early age or not born yet) i have not seen any suggestions that the child lacked the proper lessons needing to be learned from both their parents.
 
 Equality  04 Jan 2008 05:56
 3 Comments
 
 can no one see the damage that is being done to the with more and more people turning to same sex relationships the birth rate of white Europeans is decreasing rapidly whilst those of Asian, African and east European origin repopulate. this situation is made worse by the number of women seeking careers rather than a family
by  Lishman
 04 Jan 2008 13:02
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
People Who Abuse Favors, Items, Privileges And Other People 's Property Because Of Flagrance-are Clueless...
Christmas, It's Such A Fun Family Time:
In A Marriage, No One Should Mention Anything That Bothers Them Because Then It Becomes “An Issue”....
The Bible Doesn't Say All Made In God's Image Are His Children.
Mother - Daughter Relationships Are Dieing Out.
Children Should Be Treated More Fairly By Parents.
Your Parents Are The Most Influence On You.
Stealing Someone's Password And Posting "I Am Stupid" Is A Crime
If You Give Someone A Used Coffee Mug As A Birthday Gift, You Need To Wash It First.
A Christian Who Thinks It Is A Sin To Be Gay Should Condone Gay Couples Or Singles Adopting Orphaned...
New Debates
Porche 911 Turbo Is A Noticable Car On The Streets.
Is It Creul To Leave A Pet At Home (dog)
Is Coke The Best Cola
Is God More Renowned Than Buda!
Should There Be Another Major Event Created Like Christmas.
Is Taco Bell The Best Place To Eat Tacos
Should An Animal Get Introduced To Australia To Kill The Cane Toads.
If You Meet An Alien It Will Suck Out Your Brains.
Chicken Is Nice
Should Scientists Keep Working On The Value Of Pi?