» Home » Music & Entertainment
Radio & TV Is Ruining Music.
I am sick of it. Radio and TV just play the same bland, average rubbish day in day out. I was forced to listen to Radio 1 for 6 hours the other day and they played the same predictable pop all day. Popular media dictate what the masses listen too. People are never given the opportunity to hear the great music of today. Why are The Feeling famous whilst The Doves struggle for acclaim. Why have people heard of Aguilara and not Erykah Badu or Leela James. Something is awfully wrong.
 StBalders  30 Apr 2008 09:04
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
I agree, not only do they only play the rubbish of today, but it's increasingly hard to find a station that will play the classics, you know, the ones people actually like.
 
 nickwhan  03 May 2008 12:49
 Add a Comment
 
 
Music is horrible these days, you have to dig deep to find the good stuff.
 
 Mark  30 Apr 2008 19:53
 Add a Comment
 
 
To my understanding, and maybe I have it twisted, the sponsors help keep the stations on air. I can't see the record companies paying these agencies
money to play a so called artist, due to
the fact that most stars only have 15 mins. Of fame that would be a waist of money. No, the station control their own
moral obligations to what makes sense.
 
 Bacchus  30 Apr 2008 17:05
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree. Rappers could leave out sex, drugs and cuss words
 
 celva_olva  30 Apr 2008 16:49
 1 Comment
 
 yeah and I will tell you another thing I hate about squirrels. They're cocky.
by  StBalders
 30 Apr 2008 17:52
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
The laws for corporations to own more than 12 radio or TV stations were relaxed specifically for Rupert Murdoch when he bought US citizenship, but others like the KKK (Klear Khannel Kommunications) joined in as well.

Ask yourself when was the last time you heard a full news broadcast on radio performed by an all-local staff - reporters, editorial, sports, entertainment, etc. They used to be everywhere.

Now all the "disk jockeys" do is read preprinted lists of songs sent by a head office, and the computer plays them. Playlists for regional stations are determined in LA or NY with no thought for local preferences. Sometimes even the "disk jockeys" are in the big cities, and the local "station" is just a transmitter with a secretary to handle phone calls. It's all about minimizing cost and maximizing profit.

Is it any wonder that cooperative radio stations and pirate radio are becoming more popular?
 
 K9  30 Apr 2008 16:28
 1 Comment
 
 pretty sweet lyrics, like it.
by  StBalders
 30 Apr 2008 17:59
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Radio and television does seem to cater to teenagers more than to any other age group, and this audience is much less likely to value music produced by smaller, independent bands or artists. Radio is for the Eurovision crowd, plain and simple. I am 27 years old and feel totally out of place when I turn the radio on and hear what they play. Back in high school, one of my teachers said something about how we all essentially shut out music soon after graduating and tend to prefer what we liked best in our own teen years. As I get older, I am starting to realize that this may be relatively accurate.

Much of the pop that is played on radio or shown on television is remarkably uncreative and leads me to wonder if this generation will ever produce a Bob Dylan, a Led Zeppelin or have the same revolutionary effect on the music industry that some artists and bands have had in the past.

I think that the best place for those looking for something outside the bland, thoughtless and juvenile mainstream that dominates radio and television is to go online and look up independent bands and artists on networking sites such as MySpace. Granted, some of them are absolutely awful--shockingly so in many cases. But if one spends a few hours here, there is a strong likelihood that one may just find a real gem.

As for my radio habits--I have all but turned away from it entirely, due to the quality of the songs performed, except when I am in the car. In this case, however, I now usually listen to public radio, which tends to focus on call-in shows and news broadcasts, rather than music.
 
 mackenzie  30 Apr 2008 09:50
 1 Comment
 
 You are spot on Mack.

The thing that I find so frustrating is that there are Bob Dylan's and Led Zepp's out there but they will be required to sell their souls in order to get any airtime. Why should we have to spend so long trawling through MySpace to find the quality out there.

Your teacher appears to be right in some cases but I am too stubborn and love music too much to accept it personally. My tastes are constantly expanding. Only recently I discovered the joys of Kate Bush and Isaac Hayes (seperately, not a duet), it doesn't have to be new, just new to me.

I never listen to radio if I can help it. IPod, invention of the century.
by  StBalders
 30 Apr 2008 10:12
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
It is so sad that the charts are saturated with rubbish. There is a place for kiddie pop and for the latest teenage fad but must everywhere be dominated by the same clique few groups and artists. The average rising to the top rarely happens in any other field like it does in music. I am talking about:-

Mika
Aguillara
The Feeling
Keane
Black Eyed Peas
Fergie
Kylie
Kanye West
Nelly
And On and Onand On

Anyone got any gems they would like to recommend a 34 year old who has slipped out of the loop when it comes to hearing new stuff. The last real good stuff was Kings of Leon and The Arctic Monkeys.
 
 StBalders  30 Apr 2008 09:11
 Add a Comment
 
It's not television, it's the record companies. A few companies control the market and decide what will be the next big thing. There is light at the end of the tunnel. I work for a community radio station in Milton Keynes . We have no music policy, and many of our presenters are playing quality new music from unsigned bands, although my show is mainly classic oldies about a quarter of the program is modern music (usually tracks I like) and unsigned promotional material. The Internet too has dented the major labels, with new artists now able to distribute thier material without interference from the majors.
 
 arefem  30 Apr 2008 13:18
 1 Comment
 
 You are right, the record companies are as guilty. But between them, and the major radio and TV stations they are colluding to put a stranglehold on original, groundbreaking music.

I have hoped that the internet breaks this cycle, do you think it will?

I want your job, any chance of a guest slot?
by  StBalders
 30 Apr 2008 14:27
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Studies Have Shown That "Emo" Has A Deep Connection With Homosexuality.
Rap Has Gone Down Hill And So Has Rock...
Chris Brown Is A Talented Singer.
Madonna Is As Legendary As Elvis Ever Was
I Can Feel You Like A River Is True
Most Music Is Not Meant To Be Danced To.
Actors Should Not Be Replaced In A Film Series
Lieutentant Columbo Is Better Than Jessica Fletcher.
Musicals Are Awesome!
"The Wizard Of Oz" Should Be Remade Into A New Movie
New Debates
By Firing Rockets Into Israel, The Palestinians, However Misguided, Are Just Living Up To The Same Human...
How Many Of You Would Actually Fight For Our Country If You Had The Chance?
What Is Pain?
One Of The Best Things You Can Do For Yourself And Loved Ones Is To Set Goals For The Coming Year. Studies...
Apocalypse, 2012, IMMINENT
Life Isn't About What Happens To You It's How "you Choose To React To What Happens.
Life's Worst Experiences Can Teach You The Most About Life.
World Government Is Inevitable.
All Dogs Should Be Allowed In Stores
A Great Documentary On The Subject Of Horror And The Topic Of Censorship Is "Celluloid Horror".