|
It is the reasonable thing to do, for the reasons already given by Cephus, StBalders and Evidence. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Having checked with exactly what Evidence was talking about I have to agree.
Evidence pointed to an example of who would be checked at an airport. We are checking more
thoroughly now due to Islamic terrorist attacks. Now obviously if you are Muslim you are not
automatically a terrorist. But in today's climate if you are a terrorist with a bomb you are very
likely to be Muslim.
I have heard Muslim people in the paper, on the news, and on phone ins berate the fact that they are
checked at airports and other places more rigorously and frequently than white people. Well I hope
so. What are they suggesting, that an old lady should be checked as well, or instead of, just to
be Politically Correct and to appear "fair". What a pointless exercise. I feel for those who have
come under more suspicion since 9/11 and 7/7 but their annoyance should be aimed at those who have
killed innocents in the name of Islam and not at the authorities trying to keep the public safe.
The same policy of "profiling" occurs everywhere, everyday consciously or unconsciously. If 3
people walked into a sweetshop, one an old lady, one a businessman and 1 a teenager with a burberry
cap. If I was the shopkeeper i know which one I would be keeping a close eye on. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
This whole racial profiling thing has gotten way out of hand. The color of one's skin is part of
one's overall physical description, it's just idiotic to say that the murder suspect is wearing blue
jeans, a green shirt, but we're not allowed to tell you what color skin he had. It's stupid to be
looking for a criminal in a predominantly black neighborhood and not be stopping suspicious blacks
to questioning. It's moronic to be in a conflict with a religion made up primarily of arabic people
and not be looking more closely at arabic people. That doesn't mean you treat them any differently,
that doesn't mean you pull them out of line for no reason, it means that you use what you know about
the criminal or potential criminal in order to make it more likely to catch them.
People need to get over themselves. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It is critical in this time of war |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
For many purpose.....It is not racism just Stereotypical It is necessary for means of national
security.....Homicide...etc |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Racial profiling is a way to say that all people of a race act an think the same and this is not
true. Racial profiling is discrimination pure and simple. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Wow, I fail to see how the color of skin or continent you are on makes you a criminal or not.
It is not sensible a thought to say the least. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No matter what, it is STILL racism/discrimination. Its illegal in all 50 states and if a person
feels that the arresting officer or any other person of the law that they come into contact with is
enacting racial profiling, they are entitled to sue. An officer found guilty of racial profiling
automatically is fired (or placed on suspension, depends on the jurisdiction), fined, and could
possibly face a prison sentence. I would never agree with racial profiling. It doesn't prevent
threats to national security; It creates them. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Not even a constitutional concept in the remotest sense. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
So dumb.
Where do you get ideas like that its so ignorant. Ethnic extractions have nothing whatever to do
with anything of a moral nature, and certainly shouldn't be made into a legal one!
Tastes in appearance concerning race is unrelated to racism.
Prejudices in legal arenas is a different matter. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Honestly, get this through your head, more Muslims are being caught because Muslims are being
targeted more, according to official American statistics i believe the attacks from al-kida was
something like 50 minus. Honestly i think it was 25 but I'm exaggerating in your favour. However the
highest attacks was from a christian group i think that was over 900! Check yourself. Anyways isn't
it surprising how al-kida is still more popular?
I sense a conspiracy... |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
21 Apr 2008 15:43
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
