|
No one should ever be paroled early, especially violent offenders (which granted isn't the case in
this example). If you're convicted of a crime, you serve your time. If you die in prison, too bad.
Maybe you shouldn't have committed the crime to begin with. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Agreed. They did the crime, now serve the time...sick or healthy. Plenty of people have died in
prison. What's so special about this woman? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
If somebody did something bad that deserves jail time, then they should serve it out in prison. If
you are going to die anyways, it doesn't matter where. Just bring the family in when they are about
to pass through. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
I think it depends on the exact circumstances of the crime involved. I don't know anything about
this case other than what you've told me about it here. On the face of it, 30 years seems a bit
harsh for a purely passive crime. If people are intellectually sub-normal, or emotionally weak, they
can sometimes fall under the spell of another person. So I can see circumstances in which the crime
you've described should be granted leniency.
Whether this is one of those cases or not could only really be determined from a more detailed
examination of the background to this crime. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
28 May 2008 03:11
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
