» Home » Society
Persons Who Make Un-Substantiated-Allegations Or Slander Against An Innocent Person Should Be Imprisoned
Because BEARING FALSE-WITNESS is a crime against Individuality and Humanity and is a LIE. If someone has not been PROVEN = SEEN, doing you wrong? Then it is A CRIME to say they have or IMPLY they have. INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT to the contrary : This, is fair, and just, and right for all human beings.
 00uuu00  16 Dec 2008 23:10
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
How do you balance that with the need for people to be able to come forward with real information without fear of reprisal? It’s rarely easy to discern fact in situations that involve false witness.
Besides it is already illegal to perjure yourself and when they can prove it they usually throw the book at people who do so. Our legal system depends so much on testimonial evidence, so it is important to try to preserve the integrity of that evidence. Not only that a lawyer can also go to jail for knowingly allowing someone to perjure themselves.
 
 finsch  17 Dec 2008 08:39
 2 Comments
 
 un-truthful accusation is slander, and it is wrong.
by  Mystery
 17 Dec 2008 17:15
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Gossip should be outlawed.
 
 Rapunzel  17 Dec 2008 04:05
 Add a Comment
 
 
It is called, "Bullying" . Slander, and Gossip, are forms of Terrorism.
Bullying and Defamation-Of-Character should carry a jail-term.
No one has the right to treat someone else like dirt : If someone has done you no harm, then you are without basis to express your hate.
 
 Mystery  17 Dec 2008 02:48
 Add a Comment
 
 
They do, it's called wasting police time.
 
 Quincel  16 Dec 2008 23:28
 Add a Comment
 
It's in the hands of the defamed individual.
 
 Specter87  20 Dec 2008 02:39
 Add a Comment
 
 
Actually, there is quite a difference in burden between a shadow of a doubt and a reasonable doubt, but it's actually irrelevant here. Slander is not a criminal offense it is a civil matter covered by tort law. In that case it is decided by a preponderance of the evidence, not a shadow or reasonable doubt.

To suggest that it should be a criminal offense could put a lot of pressure on the first amendment.
 
 kyrosin1  18 Dec 2008 06:13
 Add a Comment
 
 
"INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT"

It is innocent until proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
 Rodney  17 Dec 2008 12:08
 5 Comments
 
 That's why your over here? To correct the phrasing? The two phrases are interchangable. They say "beyond a shadow of a doubt" in court too big guy.
by  Specter87
 17 Dec 2008 12:51
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Teen Curfews Are Good
All Bees Are Attracted To Yellow!
Moral Integrity Is More Important Than Religion.
Gay Pride Parades Should Be Held In June And July, Not April.
Anders Breivik Wasn't Right Wing At All, He Was A Socialist Obama Lover. (Fox News)
Government Assistance Should Be Drug Tested
Only Brown Skins Are Viewed As Terrorist In American Media - Terrorist Are Home Grown
The Cartoon "Pon And Zi" Is Really Sad.
Word Of The Day!
Americans Come In Many Forms And Sizes!
New Debates
Volunteer Opportunities In India | Atma
Learn Live Sound Engineering From Our Professional Sound Engineers And Develop Your Skills
Music Production Courses In Mumbai | Mumbai Music Institute
Do You Want To Be A Professional Interior Designer? Are You Looking For A Reputed Interior Designing...
The Best Skin Specialist In Mumbai | Skin N Sculpt
Find The Most Reliable Pest Control Service Provider In Melbourne
Does Trump Sounds Like Nixon Who's About To Be Impeach And Trying To Quiet The News Reporting On Him...
Online Booking Available For Tennis Courts In Mumbai | Sporloc
Do You Think That You Could Do The Cleaning Tasks By Yourself?
Has Trump Caused The White House To Become An "adult Day Care Center"?