» Home » Society
People Who Do Not Vote Are Immediately Stripped Of The Right To Complain Or Pass Any Negative Judgement On The Current Government, As They Showed That They Do Not Care Who Governs Them By Not Voting.
We are facing the problem of fewer and fewer votes cast by the younger generation, however I am yet to hear of anyone who doesn't have a complaint of some sort about the way the country is run, so why doesn't everyone vote? It simply defeats the point of democracy if too few people vote, yet it also defeats the point if voting is made compulsory. Any thoughts?
 chaew  18 Jun 2008 16:56
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
If a person gives up their right to vote, they do not have any right to say anything regarding what is happening due to the elected officials decisions. Everyone needs to cast their votes. It is an important part of our lives. They should really look into the candidates and what they stand for, make a choice and vote. Our future depends on this one person that we elect.
 
 curious  19 Jun 2008 02:54
 Add a Comment
 
 
Absolutely. You have an opportunity to choose a government at elections. If you don't exercise that right then you show that you don't mind who runs the country. Those who don't vote and complain are being hypocritical. They had the chance to get a different government but didn't use it, now they complain about something they could have stopped. This is especially true of re-elections.

EDIT: Just to stress, of course you still can complain in that no-one can stop you. But I can murder someone if I want to. The issue is that I don't think people can complain with any integrity, given that they didn't exercise their right to do something about it.
 
 Quincel  18 Jun 2008 17:34
 3 Comments
 
 what about if they have voted, but for those in power?

I do vote. Like you I think everyone should, but my one vote is so incredibly unlikely to sway anything it really is not worth doing so. I do out of principle. With that in mind do you think it is more effective to complain, and in the process enlighten a few to the shortcomings of the government, perhaps swaying a few to vote and pass the knowledge on. Who knows your comlaining and highlighting errors may be worth more than just one vote. Of course it's always better to do both in my opinion.
by  StBalders
 18 Jun 2008 18:01
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
What if they don't like any of the candidates? I know you can just tick a box or something saying none of them. But still i could understand why people wouldn't want to vote
 
 blathnaid  07 Sep 2008 19:53
 Add a Comment
 
 
I don't think it's really practical to strip people of the "right to complain" without making gross infringements into freedom of speech, if you mean it in a legalistic sense.

If you mean it in a more informal way, that their criticisms are morally invalid, then you have a point to some extent, but I think it depends on what they are complaining about. There are issues on which all the main parties more or less agree, thus depriving the electorate of a real choice.

I, for example, feel that Britain's relationship with America is disastrous in its effects. I would like to see us detach ourselves from the American embrace, leave NATO and work to build up the European Union as a world power. But who am I supposed to vote for to help bring that about? A pro-American consensus reigns through all major British political parties.

Or let's say you felt passionately that our anti-drugs policies were wrong, and you wanted drugs liberalisation. Again, who do you vote for? When people complain about politics in general, that is often what they mean : That the entire political establishment has failed systematically.

The people who were truly uninterested in politics probably wouldn't bother complaining about it anyway. They would just talk about the football instead.
 
 Hidell  18 Jun 2008 19:43
 3 Comments
 
 "Or let's say you felt passionately that our anti-drugs policies were wrong, and you wanted drugs liberalisation. Again, who do you vote for?"

The Cannabis Alliance which ran in a handful of constituencies at the last few elections, and ran in 21 places in 2005. However, they have now deregistered and will continue their fight as a pressure group.

Regardless, your point is taken.
by  Quincel
 18 Jun 2008 20:33
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
They still pay taxes. They get to complain.
 
 OzzieMan  18 Jun 2008 19:08
 Add a Comment
 
 
You can complain, no one can stop people complaining, but if you don't vote without a decent excuse you do lose credibility.

I have always voted but I am not daft enough to think my vote will ever make a difference. What about those that voted for the government in power, do they have a right, or should they keep quiet even more so.
 
 StBalders  18 Jun 2008 17:52
 Add a Comment
 
 
I think if you are under the rule of a particular government, you have the right to complain. Some people choose not to vote as they feel disaffected by the main political parties, and others feel that there vote counts for almost nothing anyway. There are many reasons for not voting, but it shouldn't strip someone of the right to complain.
 
 Carl  18 Jun 2008 17:52
 Add a Comment
 
 
I have never missed an election since achieving my majority. However I think complaining is an inalienable right whether you vote or not. Also given what few pains people go to educate themselves in any way in regards political issues I’m not sure more voters is the answer.
 
 finsch  18 Jun 2008 17:30
 Add a Comment
 
 
You can complain about a government even if you haven't voted.
 
 Mark  18 Jun 2008 17:01
 Add a Comment
 
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
The U.S. Is Not "America" But A Part Of America
The Same Personality-Type As Gandhi & Jung & MLK
We Learn From Our Mistakes
If You Want To Stay On Top Of Life, You Have To Strive For Yourself.
We Do Not Live In A Free Country
Our Shared Future Is At Stake
The Romantic Naturalist Believes A Utopian Fantasy
People Misunderstand "Make Love Not War"
If We Each Tried To Live Life The Way Michael Mccandles Did It Would Change The World For The Better
The Evangelical Church In America Is Relevant When It Comes To Issues And It Is Asleep
New Debates
The Chicken.. Or The Egg?
Porn Is Good For You And Your Partner.
Meat Is All That Is Needed To Survive.
Gordon Brown Has Lived Forever
The Following Two Pseudo-scientific Terms Should Be Added To All English Lexicons: Heterochromofoliphile...
God Created Man For The Lulz
Britain Is The Best Country In The World
Personhood Is Eternal:
Citizens Of UK Must Be Too Afraid To Speak Up To Their Government. Why Else Would A Supposed Free People...
Ashkenazim Are Descended From Abraham.