|
It's an original thought...I will give you that. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
LOL! Someone else sees the white elephant in the room regarding social security. Well said. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
(continued) We all realize in the US, Social Security and Medicare are giant ponzi schemes, and
current social security beneficiaries continually require the young working folks to pay for their
"nest egg" of social security and medicare. Since a large portion of the US population has decided
it's ok to eliminate these young working folks by being prochoice, then these same folks should be
ineligible for SS benefits and Medicare benefits, because they have created significant fewer
workers to support these government programs. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Oh no I had a vasectomy, what have I done? Oh wait I guess since we are in the middle of the biggest
baby boom since the baby boom maybe that’s not the problem.
More people generate more taxes and more expenses. And I’m guessing that 35 million unwanted
babies might not be the most stabilizing tax positive group. We need to deal with our own tax
problems like responsible adults. Or we could go with your plan of blaming everyone else and making
specious unfounded claims. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
By you unintelligent "argument", anyone against abortion should be against the "death penalty" since
it ends the person's life without their consent. Who cares what a court says about the person
they're trying to kill and what he did, the person has a right to live. |
| |
 K9  26 Sep 2008 15:00
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
This argument is based on untestable assumptions and invalid governmental propaganda.
1) all children born will become employable adults; they will contribute to the economy rather than
be a drain on it.
2) U.S. Social Security is in dire straits and not sustainable. This is a line of patter from
politicians who wish to transfer secure government holdings (which are in the black) to speculative
individual investments, which will benefit the stockbrokers and bankers but not the uninformed
investors.
3) Population growth is highly variable and cannot be predicted accurately beyond 6 to 8 years;
neither can economic futures. Note the year that Social Security is predicted to go bankrupt (2041,
I believe).
4) Social Security was never intended to constitute a complete retirement portfolio, and yet
corporations that promised substantial retirement funds in lieu of salary increases and individual
investments are now being allowed to default on these guaranteed pension plans.
5) Excess population drains worldwide resources, and yet this argument would return us to historical
times where you must produce children to provide for you in your old age.
6) There has been a substantial increase in the number of children aged 25 to 55 who are being
supported by their parents, instead of vice versa.
Please consider how these facts correspond with your opinion.
|
| |
 Lynn 26 Sep 2008 12:27
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
You do realize how illogical that sounds. Your basically saying that we SHOULD over populate a
already overpopulated world. We don't need more people we need to knock off a couple billion.
Overpopulation causes a greater stress on the environment and the economy. Without the environment
we have no world and without the economy it be no use to have them anyway because they would be
hardpressed to find work. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
2 scenarios:
If you have a child and your not ready it would cost you a good amount of money/time to change your
life plans and to raise the child. Revenues go down and expenses go up. This would mean less
possible taxable income and a greater chance of governmental assistance.
On the other hand if you were to abort the child you may continue on with your life/career and end
up contributing more money to the government than had you raised a child. You would more likely be
better set for retirement.
This is a very cold stance, but there is some truth to it.
I think this idea is very interesting Charlee. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Wow!! That is the most idiotic thing I have ever read. Here is something else stupid to say. All
those who decided to have children without enough income to raise them should not be allowed social
security or medicare either. While we are at it, lets limit the hwy your allowed to drive on by the
taxes you pay. |
| |
|
| |
| | |
