|
Scientific findings may disprove certain aspects of different religions, but it does not and
ultimately can not logically disprove the existence of God. Religion and God are separate entities,
although they are sometimes foolishly linked.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I hear all this nonsense. God this! God that! As if we are all God's friend! We are God's enemies.
We are military defects. We are recruited by Satan. That is the true world we live. We cannot bear
to accept it. The world is ugly, and we strive to see the Beauty in the ugly.
God doesn't matter to our lives. We want him to though. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Religion and Science are at their most basic different methods of answering different questions.
Science is nothing more and nothing less than a methodology for analyzing and attempting to
understand the natural world. Religion is an attempt to understand the supernatural. They by
definition are separate.
Now to a certain extent religion strays into areas where it attempts to use the supernatural to
explain the natural world and this is where religion becomes mythology. This won’t make me popular
but a literal approach to Genesis, for example, is mythology. But for the most part the ‘battle’
between religion and science is a created issue used as a political control device by secular
leaders disguised as religious leaders. They foster the impression that we scientists are intent on
destroying man’s connection to god. The truth is that, by a huge majority, scientists like most
people in the world are probably religious. Living in the Midwest U.S. Of A and being a scientist I
know a lot of scientists personally and they are mostly Christian. And for the most part they have
no problem reconciling their scientific approach to most things with a belief in god. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Well, overall, religion is irrelevant to science no matter how you slice the cake. Attempting to
prove or disprove anything concerning a god using science is out of the question. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
This I can agree with. Frankly there's no reason evolution or plate tectonics or anything else
couldn't have been created by God. But just the same as science doesn't disprove God it's also true
the Bible doesn't disprove science. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
I could claim the opposite and say that people who claim god does exist make a basic error in
assuming god made up the system being discovered.
The debate will end when either real scientific proof of god is show OR the universe is explained
completely scientifically. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
In typical religious ignorance and dishonesty, Buttplugman gets it wrong again, pretending that the
scientific side has to prove anything or has tried. The godbots are the ones making the claim, so
the burden of proof lies with the liars...I mean, the religious.
Buttplugman is the one who has the burden of proof, and he could easily meet it if he tried. If he
really believed what the buybull says is possible, then he would kill himself and come back
to life.
It he can't do it, then "god" does not exist.
If he won't do it, then he knows that "god" doesn't exist but is too afraid to back up his
claim with proof. |
| |
 K9  03 Aug 2009 18:35
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I toyed with that. It's basically believing in a God that would pull the wool over your eyes anyway.
A liar and a cheat. Divine qualities indeed. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Well if you belive in god no one can argue with that can they if there is a god then i guess he is a
bit tricky ... But hey Bugman scientists dont try to disprove god they try to understand what they
find ... |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
