|
|
 |
|
Porn is moral when the people having sex are of legal age and are consenting to the sexual
activities that are being filmed. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The problem with child porn isn't the porn, it's the fact that it uses children, which is in and of
itself, immoral in most modern societies. It's not an issue of when does child pornography become
acceptable, it's an issue of any sexual use of a child whatsoever is unacceptable.
You seem to be seriously confusing your issues. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
If this is true then the inverse must be true. What is moral is always moral.... We know that this
is not the case. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Morality is always situationaly relative.Moral absolutes are the province of fanatics and madmen. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
You know, people have the same view on war, the same views on everything people view as immoral, bad
oh shun oh shun oh shun. It's the World and if you haven't woken up yet, I believe we're in the year
2008, if I am wrong do wake me up.
Stop with all this immoral stuff. Porn is not immoral, because if it were it wouldn't be so
widespread as it is. Besides, porn is not just here, in the U.S.A., it is everywhere.
I'm tired of people whining over what's right and wrong, would you rather everything be nice and
dandy, dull and boring? Bull to you if you say so. No one does and no matter how much people want to
think keeping the world at peace is what will solve it, they're kidding themselves. It's keeping
peace with yourself.
Thus bringing me to the porn subject. First I would like to say Adults are much older than children,
I would hope, and for that fact ALONE it instantly loses almost all its immorality there. And
comparing it to something such as child porn? Come on, that's the immoral part.
If you think a kid viewing porn is going to get up and go make a porno themselves? To my knowledge,
that's called "abuse" for the fact that another adult makes them do it, or tells them it's a good
idea.
So when they're forced to, it's then immoral, yes that is right. And it's not porn's fault, it's the
individual who thought it'd be cool to go do what he did, I mean he thought it was a good idea. It'd
be him being the immoral one.
Think about it, kids don't just go to the store, buy a camera and walk around the streets looking
for fine lookin' baby foxes.
Yes children are young and they like to explore and for Christ's Sake, 'scuse my hebrew, let them.
Which brings me to my next point. Children viewing porn brings no harm. It's their parents who must
watch over them and guide them.
I doubt some Kid, keep in mind I say kid, is going to let some site rule over what his, or her
parents say.
Which brings me to my next point, a kid doesn't know what the hell is going on when he or she
watches it, most likely. And if he, or she, does then just take it as an early learning session.
Besides like I said, parents should be watching them.
Porn has become so big that it has allowed many people to become famous and get that paper. It's not
exposure when you have money covering you. Excuse the metaphor.
I am sure a porn star is not going to let his, or her children become like them and as a matter of
fact will have enough money to send them to a great school and so what if the kids at the school
watch his, or her mom. What're they going to say to hurt the kid's feelings?
"Oh man, I saw your mom last night."
"Oh man, I did your mom last night."
Or any other lame comebacks as such are easily defended against.
People need to shut up with all that is immoral, everything that happens in this world happens for a
reason, so go ahead and make it bad if you want.
Also, stop comparing apples and oranges.
It's the adults, remember, who are immoral. They actually can think for themselves. And if you
recall me saying do you think a kid would listen to a site over someone else, or their parents,
you're kidding yourself. So if the parents say it's wrong, they kid will listen and vice versa they
will listen.
And when adults make the porn, themselves...it's for entertainment and it's actually not against the
law which is why you see so many sites around having to make sure you're above the age of eighteen
before they do anything to you, also before you enter any of the sites they place the same crap. You
have to be eighteen to enter and I say anyone who tries to warn before hand...has a heart.
I could go on all day, but I'll just wait for someone to comment so I can talk to them and answer
any questions they have. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It used to be immoral for a woman to show her ankle, it's not considered to be anymore.
Generally I'd agree that child pornography would always be immoral, but one problem with it is the
definition of a child might not always be the same. Even now there would be debate about whether a
15 year old having sex with another 15 year old and taping it was part of a horrible immoral act of
child pornography or instead was just a teenager having some kinky fun.
Anyway, I'm still steadfast against child pornography, I just don't think it's as simple as once
immoral then always immoral. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Adult pornography is neither moral nor immoral when it involves consenting adults. Child pornography
is immoral and illegal as it takes advantage of and abuses vulnerable minors. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Immoral porn never becomes moral porn, as it is finite. It is a thing and cannot change, we can only
change how we feel about it. Pornography is not immoral, it is just images of people having sex as
performance with the intent to arouse the viewer. There is no immorality in that |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Hold on a mo. What have you done there? You seem to have lumped child porn into the same category
as regular porn. Why? There is a clear distinction between the two just as there is a clear
distinction between having sex and having sex with a child. It seems very obvious to me, what am I
missing? |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
20 Aug 2008 16:57
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
