|
I think that the worst thing in the world is nuclear poison! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I agree |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I think that nuclear weapons should be abolished |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Unfortunately they exist and we can't uninvent them. How would it happen? Who would be the first
to abolish them? Not the US for certain. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Absolutely not. Nuclear weapons are there primarily as a deterrent, secondarily as an actual
offensive weapon. I believe, if the USA didn't have nuclear weapons, it would have been subject to
many more terrorist attacks, as well as its major allied countries. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
So long as mankind possesses the attributes of avarice and ambition war will not cease.
Besides, there is no reason that you can give a country to stop producing nuclear weapons. Even if
you say you will nuke them.
Peace is a choice. If nuclear weapons are to cease to exist . . . The knowledge of them would have
to leave, history would need to be rewritten, and EVERY SINGLE PERSON in the world would have to
choose to do so. (And everyone would have to be an angel to be that honest.)
As Will Durant said, It is best to seek peace but keep your gunpowder dry. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No, I guarantee that some crazy country will pretend to and then on some sunny day.... BOOM that
country becomes ruler of the world. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Countries need ways to defend themselves. We could try to lessen nuclear arsenals around the world
but getting rid of one of our most effective weapons would be foolish. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
There's really no way that you can abolish nuclear weapons, we know how to build them so even if we
destroyed them all, someone could build them again. You can't put the genie back in the bottle. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Nuclear weapons have brought peace to much of the world since the end of the Second World War. The
tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union would almost certainly have erupted in war
had it not been for the spectre of total annihilation giving everyone pause for thought.
Even if you could get general agreement from all the countries in the world to do away with their
nuclear weapons, how could you verify that they had done it? Even if they did do it, how could you
guarantee that they would not develop new nuclear weapons? In a disarmed world, whoever was the
first to get themselves a working supply of nukes would rule. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
13 Feb 2008 12:04
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
