|
How about just "no religious education at all". |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I beliveo if your religion is taught in school why cant ours? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
OK, I'll bite and say "yes" and since it's utterly impossible to teach about all the little
religions (there are thousands of Christian denominations alone and they take their differences
seriously) then that means NO religion education should be taught in public school (other than as
part of history lessons since they have been a big part of all of recorded history). |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Equal rights for the win! |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Religion isn't taught at all. We are told what it is, but not its history, or different sects.
Religion isn't in schools, and shouldn't be in schools. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
It's actually comical and sad. There are some who can teach history and social studies without bias
but few that do. We are biased creatures,often due to our concerns that people see things the right
way (like we do).
It would be great if things could be taught from all perspectives and simple knowledge was the
ultimate goal. Fact is, history is biased.
So we come to religion. It is literally insane to exclude religion from history and social studies.
History without religion is false history. But how to teach it? Don't ask me. I have no idea how it
could be done (I could do it but I would be denounced by most religions and the impact on students
would range from very good to very bad). I would be speaking the exact same words while students
would be hearing completely different messages.
At the least, people should learn that religion is not taught, that it's impact on society has been
monumental, and it would be wise to study the major religions which have had so much impact.
Thus, minor religions need not apply at this time. If western culture can't come to grips with the
history of Roman Catholicism and it's effects on that culture, then the thought of teaching about
any other religion would be insane.
In the end, people should be taught that they are religious illiterates due to the fact that
religions cannot be taught during their education. It would be nice if this concept could be taken
into consideration when the illiterate take part in religious discussion.
Seriously, how much time does the average person study any religion? Even their own? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I don't think the law should allow (schools) teachings of religion. Many people aren't sure if they
believe in God, or any other religions. Even those, who know there religious perspective shouldn't
be put in a place where he or she would have to be taught things he or she doesn't even believe
(in). |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I think the law is that NO religion is allowed to be taught in public school systems. That appears
to work out for everyone. This way, no religion is left out or given more treatment than another. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Devil's Advocate this debate here for you;-)
1. Unless you stick to ONE Major religion - I meant stupidity -
you will never explore the entire DEPTHS or feel THE FULL FORCE of the Darkside ;-)......
2. Two many religions spoil - I meant - cooks ;-) spoil the broth;-) |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|