|
Yes.
I never had any problems with Mark, myself. I was raised around very odd persons, so I have a higher
tolerance of the bizarre and strange. I think that it is good to try and understand people, even if
you do not like their style or their personality.
It can grow you as a person to look at things from some other person's eyes. Try and see the bigger
picture, and think outside the box.
So I agree upon that basis. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
That's right I was wondering about Mark. Good for a laugh or roll of the eyeballs.
Most sincerely. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yeah you could always count on him getting worked up and adding some pith to a debate. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
I worked my butt off to drive him off the site and i come back to see that you people want him back,
he was a bad debater, he couldn't except anyone's opinion, he always was right in his eyes. I
removed a burdon off your backs. Why do you want it back. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Too many innocent debates that have nothing to do with religion are at stake. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
This website needs fewer unintelligent Christians. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Mark was more sad than funny, although he wasn't as sad as some of the other posters who are just
religious fanatics without an ounce of common sense or rational thinking ability. However, in the
end, Mark was nothing more than a chicken who ran away with his tail between his legs when the going
got tough, he was never able to present a rational, reasonable argument or support anything he said
with demonstrable evidence, why would we want someone like that to come back?
Good riddance, Mark. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
He was good for a laugh. It was tinged with pity, though, because he obviously wasn't right in the
head.
Incidentally, Mark was also a heretic himself. Some of the strange doctrinal notions he had
developed were in fact quite contrary to the Catholic faith he claimed to profess. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
07 Oct 2008 03:47
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
