 |
|
|
|
| Man Never Walked On The Moon In 1969 |
| My personal opinion is the whole thing was a very expensive movie created by the U.S government. And furthermore i don't think man landed on the moon until December 11, 1972 with Apollo 17. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yea they did. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Look at the amazing technology on earth, and compare it to going to the moon. The internet, wireless
phones, video games, modern tanks... These things are about as -or in some cases more- amazing than
pushing away from earth to land on a rock outside. Though the latter is more "romantic" or a
romantic-killer, depending on how you see it.
The eagle has landed = the phoenix has landed.
Apollo = sun god.
11 = Jachin and Boaz, methinks. Also seen in the twin towers.
The highest of Masons control the earth AND the moon. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
How are they going to stage it? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Well there are some different ways I could go here but will stick with the basics. You must remember
the Apollo ships were transmitting radio signals throughout. One thing we couldn't fake then or now
is the telemetric data that was gathered by every nation with a radio dish in the world. The
conspiracy would have had to involve the Russians, Australians, Chinese, as well as several of the
European nations that helped gather the telemetric data. Simple triangulation would have told the
USSR or any nation that cared to listen that the Americans were lying about their moon mission. I
can’t imagine a scenario where a secret like that gets kept by the Russians. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yeah, yeah sure we never walked on the moon. And the Earth is flat and Santa Clause is real.... |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Boy ! You must be the kind of guy who still believes Elvis is not dead !
Stop polluting serious sites with your paranoia, please...
When I saw the astronaut jumping, because of the lower moon gravity, I could not have the slightest
doubt. Remember, this took place in the seventies, when all the computer technology required to fake
that effect was not available anywhere. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Wow, there's no end to crazt theories, is there?
It looks like the same lunar landscape because the moon doesn't have that much of a varying
landscape. The only differences is between crater and not crater, maria and not maria. The maria
that the Apollo mission landed on was composed of miles of almost the exact same surface
features.
They went four times in quick succession because they were all hyped up about their success, and
wanted to make travel to the moon a common place thing.
No, it wouldn't have been easier to fake. Have you seen the movies from that time period? You'd need
way more advanced technology to accurately fake it enough to stand up to criticism so long.
I doubt it was worth the scandal that would've been caused.
Gus Grissom not really to sure about (don't remember him). Neil Armstrong maybe just didn't like
being hounded by the media. If he liked being hounded by the media he would've become a pop star
instead of an astronaut. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
In fact it's illegal to broadcast something that's not true and people watched it at the seen take
off so your definitely wrong. I don't think the people that believe this is fake have even been into
to space so how do they know. If it was a fake we would have known years ago, but it's not so just
don't be jealous you've not been into space. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Its my understanding, even to this day, (independent) scientists use 'mirrors' placed by the Apollo
astronauts upon the surface of the moon to measure the changes in the distance between the Earth and
the moon. The only possible way that they could be up there is that they were placed there by men
(considering the technology of that time). Aside from this, they brought back a large amount of
lunar material which i imagine would be fairly difficult to fake.
Please correct me if i am wrong on this. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It’s quite understandable how people who are not experienced in scientific fields relating to
cosmology act when faced against something they conceive to be “completely absurd”, since it is
not what they encounter within their everyday life. I see no objectively proposed reason why the
Apollo Moon Landings were faked, other than all the “government conspiracy” theories that people
claim are linked to just about everything now a days. Furthermore, there is not a single objection
to the Apollo Moon Landings that is not easily explained using knowledge that most people don’t
have when concerning the subject. If anyone would like a reference to a good bit of information
relating to my point of view, please go to www.wikipedia.com and type in "Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Theories". |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I do not believe it was a fake. If it was a fake, the truth would have come out sooner or later.
Many people believe it was a fake, but they do not realize that back in the 1960s, people’s minds
did not work like people’s minds today. People in the 1960s had more morals and values and would
not lie or cover up things like they would today. Above all, they would not have had the
intelligence or the equipment to stage such an event and make it look 100% real. They did not even
have color TV and air conditioning in cars was a new thing in 1969. So, to be able to stage a fake
moon landing and get by with it would have been impossible in 1969. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 For and Against Recent Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08 Apr 2008 04:09
Sign In
