|
By your topic and description alone you are correct more cost to the producer should equal more
cost to the comsumer. Although It will never happen as society is getting larger every year and
those who WILL NOT control there weight are soon to be the majority and this will cause smaller
clother to sell less and to there by be less profitable so this is why the price for smaller clothes
rises to equal that of the larger clothes that cost more to make. I agree again that more material
SHOULD cost more but unfortunatly it will probally not happen which is a shame as it would be
another incentive for people to get healthier. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It is quite logical since it would cost more money to make a larger garment of clothing. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It's logical.
Frankly that's the same reason it's unfair women's clothing usually costs more than men's - because
typically the men's clothing required substantially more materials to make. But of course other
factors influence price besides just material - such as fashion or supply and demand. Larger
clothes "should" cost more, but they just don't. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
I understand what you are saying but it wouldn't work if someone was obese to a state that they
couldn't get around and make money so making the price bigger wouldn't help. Of course not all obese
people are like that but it wouldn't actually be fair to those who are. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Prices are based on what the market will bear. Men and bigger people are commonly less interested in
high fashion. So they are willing to pay less. However in fact at discount outlets larger sizes
typically do cost less. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
19 Nov 2009 08:32
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
