James Bond Has As Much Historical Reality As Jesus
Various candidates have been offered as the real-life inspirations for James Bond, including Ian Fleming himself and Fitzroy MacLean. Obviously the name was changed before the Gospels of Bond were written, but that was the case with Jesus too. Does anyone believe that Jesus' surname was really "Christ", "The Anointed One"? "The name's Christ, Jesus Christ." Of course not. Even if the gospel tales of Jesus are based on some semblance of historical reality, so too are the tales of James Bond. Therefore Bond is as at least as historical a figure as Jesus was.
THE ENTIRE Jesus Christ story is actually a 10,000 year old bedtime story parents would tell their
kids while pointing at the heavens above. (STARGAZING!) The NORTH STAR is the star of Bethlehem,
and on the 25th of December the THREE KINGS (three stars on orions belt) are in direct line with
where the SUN (son of god) RISES making the days longer etc etc. Most of what is in the bible
originated from stories naming the different constellations and how they interacted with the
seasons, the moon, the sunrises, etc.
Are you kidding me hidell!? In that statement you just said that JESUS IS NOT REAL wow have you ever
read a bible and actually that this was all fake!?
I'm an avowed Atheist, but even I recognise that there is more grounding to the existence of Jesus
(or someone we know as) than James Bond. James Bond is a fictional character invented with
influences from real people. There is evidence (and I'm not saying conclusive, I'm not interested in
that debate) that Jesus was a real person, no influence, homages or anything.
Jesus may turn out not to have existed, but the evidence for him having existed is stronger than
that for James Bond. Therefore James Bond does not have 'as much historical reality' as Jesus.
15 Jun 2008 20:28
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
