 |
|
|
|
| Pierce Brendan Brosnan Could Play Jame Bond, The Time Scale Doesn't Make Sense |
| Pears Broslin was told that he was too old for the last film as it was a prequel and based years before. But this is rubbish.
The time scale doesn't make sense, M already has her M status and it's 2005 or 2006.
He could have played him. In reality Jame Bond would be in his 70's or 80's by now. You do the sums. In the first film Bond was in his 30's or 40's. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whats wrong witth P.B.??
He's a good actor.
And I don't see what people see in D.C.
He's ugly. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Blarg.
Pierce Brosnan is not sexy. He just thinks he is.
And alot of ppl think he is.
But I do not, nor ever have.
He's too......oily, oh I don't know, just not SEXY.
The Daniel Craig is SO MUCH SEXIER as James Bond.
Those blue eyes! Oh lordy-mercy !! ;-)
And that A$$, dam.
I vote Daniel Craig any day over Pierce Brosnan is Boring.
Daniel Craig is a better actor and exudes a raw maleness. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 For and Against Recent Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 Mar 2008 21:35
Sign In
