|
This is true. If you have a bird, then you need to be going into the men's restroom. If you have a
tweety, then you need to be in the women's restroom. Your sexual orientation should not determine
which bathroom you use. Your urination organ should be what determines if you go into the male or
female restroom. Men have no reason to go into the women's restroom and vice versa. Going into the
opposite restroom should be punishable by law. People who go into the opposite bathroom should be
arrested and slapped with large fine. There should be a separate bathroom for gay people anyway. It
would be a great place for them to meet each other. In a gay bathroom, one's sexual orientation
would never be hard to guess. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It is wrong. People need to deal with what parts they are dealt and act accordingly. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yea i agree thats not right for them to be able to walk in if they are the opposite sex that
shouldn't have passed. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
It's not homosexuals that can enter the opposite's sexies bathrooms it's transsexauls
A transsexual is something completely different from a homosexual. Learn the difference before you
speak next time |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I agree with the idea of a common washroom and separate stalls. Why not? We tend to have closed off
stalls anyways. Just don't go stripping in the common area.
Of course, privately owned businesses and such shouldn't be forced to change, but public places
should be gender neutral.
Why have the separate bathrooms anyways if the stalls are closed? As long as people aren't stripping
in the common area, it shouldn't be a problem.
And as for urinals, you can have those in their own stall.
If anyone's gonna argue baby changing stations, those should be in the common area and accessible to
all genders. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
A good alternative would be to create gender neutral restrooms in all public institutions. There is
really no good reason to segregate the sexes the way they are currently. It would be just as simple
and appropriate to create a single washroom, with private enclosed stalls, which could be used by
anyone of any gender. This would necessarily result in the end of male urinals, but I don't think
that too many men would be up in arms over this.
Back when I was an undergraduate student at university, a few activists on campus rallied for gender
neutral washrooms, in order to accommodate transgendered (not necessarily homosexual) students. I
thought that the whole suggestion was frivolous then, but I altered my position since that time. I
would still not support a measure where the government might force private companies to comply with
the new gender-neutral restroom standards, but public institutions should aim to replace traditional
washrooms with new, inclusive ones, whenever they upgrade or build new facilities. This would have
the least dramatic effect on the business community and on our tax dollars. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The system has been segregation since it started. It should have never been the case that we had
'separate but equal' bathrooms. Creating separate bathrooms should be the right of individuals and
businesses on private property.
If this is for ONLY homosexuals then I do think it's retarded if someone has to approve of ones
homosexuality. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
29 May 2008 02:03
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
