|
Well, duh. Ever have a conflicting thought? I believe in a woman's right to choose, but also
believe that abortion is taking a life. I see both sides. Eventually, we have to take a stance on
most important things and in my example, I choose a woman's right to choose, but do have two
separate opinions on the subject. Sometimes, we just have to go with the opinion that feels right
to us, even if we also see the other side. OMG...is this a real question? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I'm "for" alot of things because I wish to act collectivly on certain issues. Individually I am
"against" them, but sometimes you have to act in a way that is best for the team. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
This, I believe to be true. Almost all debatable subjects have certain elements that contribute to
ones reasoning for either for or against. Sometimes these characteristic even out, creating a
contemplation of "for" and "against", and the need for a middle column. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
The nature of debate is that if you dont completely agree with the resolution then you
disagree with it, simple as that. There is no such thing as "partially agree". If you feel that way,
then vote against it and post your version of the resolution as a separate debate, which you can
then agree with.
You don't see congress asking "who thinks we should both pass this bill and not pass it?" or
courts of law asking the jury "how many of you feel the defendant should be found both guilty
and not guilty?".
There is always a default category for undecided people, and in debate the default category is
"against". |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
15 Nov 2008 16:24
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
