|
The supernatural cannot be tested by science, because science is the study of our natural world.
It is impossible to disprove the existence of God, but you can prove the existence of God using
logic- Everything has a creator. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Using science it is. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
In my opinion the scientific method is the only reliable way to prove or disprove something outside
of personal context. Simply put science is a process by which we attempt to use evidence and
observations from the natural universe to support or disprove hypotheses concerning the mechanisms
of the natural universe. The supernatural is not part of this context. The scientific method can
neither affirm nor disprove something not bound by physical law. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
You can prove God's (or other supernatural being's) miracles, but no, you can't really prove the
existence, or the lack thereof, of God. (Which is why it makes for such interesing debates) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
*Signed, sealed, delivered* |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
To say it is impossible to prove would be saying you know all the ways of the universe and none of
them would work. So, i have to disagree. We cant know its impossible unless we know everything.
I would think the scientists in the group would have to disagree also because it is limiting their
ability to test all roads. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
You may say it's impossible to walk on water, but people do it on a daily basis in the winter, when
it's frozen. So is impossible an absolute? According to Lynn there are no absolutes except the fact
that there are no absolutes. However, absolute is a word, the word absolute, so there's one. Maybe
there are others, who knows, and who knows that? |
| |
 joe9  27 Nov 2008 17:21
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
