|
Yes, I do believe in giving everybody a second chance. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Some people deserve a second chance. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I see drug-dealers as rapist/molesters.
What reason?
They NUMB the capacity of the kids to FEEL and to THINK.
Same way a rapist/molester does.
It is the same result.
Hire them? &^*&^*&*&^ NO.
Arson and shoplifter?
Yes.
Why?
One burns things to erase their source of anger.
One takes things to appropriate vicarious love.
(same mechanism as anorexia/bulimia, only it is a different venue than food: It is an object an
attempt to transmogrify certain feelings/memories).
To hire anyone, a felonious person, is to hire someone who is legally, and possibly morally, and
possibly socially-handicapped.
There will be baggage one way or another.
But if Society never hires any of these people?
Society is just begging for a heavy weight to carry within the social-system some other way......
Hiring is least objectionable method of which to deal with felons.
Some are very open to the positive-benefits of counseling.
Those ones can very easily be engrafted into the the normal-workplace.
And I think it should be done.
I do not believe anyone started out in life thinking, "gee, I wanna be a felon when I grow
up".......;-)
You know what I'm saying?
I'm just saying........ |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Yes, it is a good idea especially if you're planning something like a bank job. Hiring an
experienced felon, preferably with firearms experience, would be essential. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I believe it has to be a case by case situation. You cannot broad brush this. A rapist is clearly
a different type of criminal than an arsonist. Or a shoplifter vs a drug dealer. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Most major corporations do not want to take away an immense downside to committing crimes.
As well, not many other employees feel comfortable with a former felon working with them.
Human resources has to make some touch decisions but when it comes down to hiring a felon, it just
isn't worth it. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|