» Home » Arts
Art Is Useless
I really love art, but sometimes i can't help feeling that it isn't useful. Yes, it may look nice and it may have some sort of emotional meaning- but it does it really help anyone? ..... I think may be it should be changed from pointless to useless as grokit pointed out, 'even pointess art has a point' which is totally true. And also i think people are taking this a bit too personally...this is a debate people i am not saying art definalty IS pointless!!!! I am merely asking you what you think!!!
 blathnaid  04 Sep 2008 21:20
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
Art is pointless. However, I do believe that nothing can replace the "feeling you get" when you deeply enjoy and observe the master pieces that are called art. Unfortunately, it is true that art does nothing for society, and is just a waste of an artists time.
 
 bluestater  07 Sep 2008 02:53
 Add a Comment
 
 
I will take the Devil's Advocate side on this one.
(Because, I was a 4.0 GPA Fine Arts Student all through school.)

That is my disclaimer;-).......ok now:

Yes, Art is worthless because of the following reasons:

1. Art is the pen on the paper of the Soul Of All Humanity.
2. Art shows the UGLINESS in said souls ;-)
and we all know how much we groove-on ugly-souls;-)
3. Art depicts reality in a way no other avenue is possible to
Human Beings: So, we get, from art, a perspective which
is unavailable in any other medium of expression of the
Human Condition: We all know how depraved humans are.
So it is like we REALLY WANNA KNOW that SH!t, huh? ;-)
4. Like the poet Keats said:
"A thing of beauty is a joy forever: Its loveliness increases;
it will never pass into nothingness; but will keep a bower
quiet for us,and a sleep full of sweet dreams, and health".

And we know how much we despise all such observations
by lovely loving wonder-filled-souls who with their pens and papers, or with their painter's tray and easel, portray for
our wondering eyes, and bursting hearts with beauty,
all that we long and live for as eternal souls which are yet also, mortal and subject to decay death and depravity, and go mourning one day at a time, to our graves.

Art lifts us up, if yet temporarily, above all that, for a brief yet Inspired View of The Eternal.

Yes, I agree: Art is worthless.
There is no future in any of that, just as Humans have no future or any hope anyway on this PRACTICAL REALISTIC EARTH;-)

I agree with this debate for all those reasons and more:
And I AM, The Devil's Advocate today.

Thank you very much,

*Bows*
*Walks Away*

Insincerely,
Scorpion.
 
 Scorpion  04 Sep 2008 23:47
 3 Comments
 
 hmmm
by  pebbels
 06 Sep 2008 19:45
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Art is such as broad subject that you cant possibly say that all types of art or pointless.
 
 J_Allen  04 Sep 2008 23:29
 Add a Comment
 
 
It's not pointless at all (yet, it's also not centrally important either). It has it's place.

The symbolic thoughts and imagery of art with cave men is thought to have been key to our sociocultural development and brain evolution. And functional items like pottery, rugs, clothing, weapons, hunting tools, were often themselves art. And you can say art recorded and punctuated every major historical cultural development among all the peoples around the world. Also art is a safety valve which releases the emotions of the artist as well as many of the viewers. And of course it is simply decorative and that too has value.

Is funding art more important than funding other school subjects? NO. It should get some funding but understand why it may be cut whereas math or languages classes would not be cut.

Is a career in art smart? Well it can be, but you probably shouldn't quit your day job. Relatively few artists are financial successes.

Is some abstract or shocking art overrated, maybe even pointless? Yes, some of it is. But, just because you personally don't appreciate a piece of art doesn't automatically make it pointless. It still may have value or meaning to the artist and/or to a small segment of the population.
 
 Grenache  04 Sep 2008 21:47
 1 Comment
 
 Sorry, I see I should have posted on the other side.
by  Grenache
 04 Sep 2008 21:51
Comment
  
Comment
  
Art is a way of letting out your emotions, making a statement, or way of telling a story. Art speaks to everyone and makes impressions on us that could last a life time.
 
 mordsith  16 Dec 2008 23:57
 Add a Comment
 
 
I disagree absolutely. Art purifies the mind and releases stress, and emotions. Good or bad. It's good for the soul. It can teach about the past, exhibit the present, and and show feelings of hope for the future.
 
 erinargues  12 Sep 2008 00:37
 Add a Comment
 
 
It is hard to deny the continuous narrative art provides through the ages.
 
 keepmindok  07 Sep 2008 18:38
 Add a Comment
 
 
What do you meaning by pointless? Does anything truely have a point in the grand scale. What's the use of working your whole life if your just going to die? What's the use of stating a theory if a guy will probably just state a opposite theory against it?
 
 Smito  07 Sep 2008 17:07
 14 Comments
 
 People work there whole lives to fill the space, between life and death. And the last point you made, which I would call debate, it's how ideas evolve.
by  Balance_92
 07 Sep 2008 17:16
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Art can be used as a tool for getting a message across, from politics to belief. Art can be used to capture the time at which it was created., art is an artifact. Art isn't useless at all. I know it isn't a need, but luxury. But if art looks nice on a wall or in the corner of a room, of even outside, doesn't that mean that it has a positive effect on the environment? And having nice surroundings is a need. Without we would be deprived.
 
 Balance_92  07 Sep 2008 17:03
 Add a Comment
 
 
Art is just a way to express yourself if you are making it. Other wise its just for amusment to look at in my opinion. I think that its also used as a status of the amount of money you have. If you walk into a house with plain walls and then into a house with walls full oof origional paintings I'm sure you'll be like "wow i like this house way better than that one" only because it has pictures in it. Art can also can be used as gifts or ways to share yourself with the rest of the world. So i would say art is totally NOT unless.
 
 pebbels  06 Sep 2008 19:44
 Add a Comment
 
 
Nope not pointless easier to express your feelings
 
 Angelz  06 Sep 2008 19:20
 Add a Comment
 
 
A world without art would fall apart. Without art there would be
no entertainment or pleasure because anything enjoyable can
be art in someone's eyes. Without those things people would
not want to work because all they do it for is to survive which
they can do on there own by hunting for food and stealing tools.
Without workers the world would not progress, the suicide count
will go way up and slowly but surely the whole human race would
become uncivilized barbarians killing each other for fun and eventually die out. Btw, im only 12 and i came up with this.
 
 naruto3489  05 Sep 2008 00:12
 Add a Comment
 
 
Even pointless art "has a point" !
 
 grokit  04 Sep 2008 23:56
 1 Comment
 
 yes, the point on the end of my stinger;-)
by  Scorpion
 04 Sep 2008 23:59
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Art is the spice of life, without it sucide would be a major issue among the common masses. You may not realize it but art is all around you, you can't avoid it and I can't see why you would want to. I believe Grenache said it very well.
 
 verum  04 Sep 2008 22:38
 3 Comments
 
 Common masses? this isn't the 19th century with the great unwashed proles. I guess art is what ever you make of it personally
by  JakP
 04 Sep 2008 22:45
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Twilight Is The Next Big Thing
"It Is Only With The Heart That One May See Rightly":